Thumbs up on removal
> On May 19, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote:
>
> @Eric_Friedrich - any concerns from you regarding removal of these
> duplicate routes? Here they are to summarize:
>
> remove GET /api/$version/deliveryservices/list in favor of GET
>
@Eric_Friedrich - any concerns from you regarding removal of these
duplicate routes? Here they are to summarize:
remove GET /api/$version/deliveryservices/list in favor of GET
/api/$version/deliveryservices
remove GET /api/$version/deliveryservices/:id/get in favor of GET
yep, not used by TO client, dave.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
> I assume you did a check of the client to make sure it wasn't using those
> routes?
> Other than that, no concerns here.
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jeremy Mitchell
I assume you did a check of the client to make sure it wasn't using those
routes?
Other than that, no concerns here.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jeremy Mitchell
wrote:
> As we move towards a new authorization model on the TO API which includes
> roles, capabilities