Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi guys,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Eike Rathke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A specialized parser could almost certainly be faster than the general
SAX parser passing strings back and forth. I wouldn't do it with
lex/yacc though, they're a nightmare to
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi guys,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Eike Rathke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A specialized parser could almost certainly be faster than the general
SAX parser passing strings back and forth. I wouldn't do it with
lex/yacc though,
Hi guys,
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Eike Rathke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A specialized parser could almost certainly be faster than the general
SAX parser passing strings back and forth. I wouldn't do it with
lex/yacc though, they're a nightmare to maintain, and in case wrong code
was
Hi Thorsten,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 23:18:24 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
hm. I'd profile a larger test case beforehand - spirit is a recursive
parser vs. yacc being table-driven.
A valid concern. IMHO yacc _will_ be faster anyway, the question is just
how much, and whether spirit would be
Eike Rathke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A specialized parser could almost certainly be faster than the general
SAX parser passing strings back and forth. I wouldn't do it with
lex/yacc though, they're a nightmare to maintain, and in case wrong code
was generated, which can happen, you're almost
Hi Niklas,
Niklas Nebel wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
The calculation just gives, what the optimum (minimum) looks like. If
the implementation does more string instantiations than calculated,
than it is obviously not optimal (in this aspect) and the impact of
string con- /
Hi Niklas,
Niklas Nebel wrote:
Taking an attribute name as an example, with the SAX interface
inbetween, the via callbacks part looks (roughly) like this:
The name is copied into a vector for the XAttributeList implementation,
copied again for two getNameByIndex calls (one to look for
Hi Kay,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 17:38:52 +0200, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
investigating especially into constructiondestruction and suggesting a
slightly modified variant, with improved behavior. So, if you have some
time left, I would like to get your feedback ;-).
Thank
