Re: [udk-dev] details about urp release call

2005-07-12 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Arnulf, life cycle for remote objects is in principal not different compared to local objects. All UNO objects are reference counted. If the reference drops to zero, the object destructs itself. During a remote calls, objects become passed to the

Re: [udk-dev] details about urp release call

2005-07-12 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Arnulf Wiedemann wrote: Hi Kay, thanks for the answer, that helps me partially. My detailed question is: I am sitting on the client side, the server is an ooo process with the urp/urtp bridge started on a socket. I query an Interface and get an object and a cache_index for the object back

Re: [udk-dev] details about urp release call

2005-07-12 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Arnulf Wiedemann wrote: Hi Stephan, Am Dienstag, 12. Juli 2005 10:00 schrieb Stephan Bergmann: Arnulf Wiedemann wrote: [...] The section Object Life Cycle of http://udk.openoffice.org/common/man/spec/urp.html has all the details; does that meen for the client side I have to do garbage

Re: [udk-dev] details about urp release call

2005-07-12 Thread Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg
Stephan Bergmann wrote: The overall validity of turning off MUSTREPLY and SYNCHRONOUS for a normal (not one-way) UNO interface method invocation is at least questionable. One basic property of UNO is that a sequence of method invocations (of not--one-way methods) is executed sequentially,