[GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart merged pull request #68: [NO JIRA] Do not build on ASF Windows nodes

2020-10-16 Thread GitBox
reckart merged pull request #68: URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/68 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart commented on pull request #66: [UIMA 6273] isBeforeV3 variable not reset in BinaryCasSerDes

2020-10-16 Thread GitBox
reckart commented on pull request #66: URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/66#issuecomment-710686113 @mjunsilo I have generated a few serialized CASes using the UIMAv2 CasIOUtilsTest and create a unit test trying to load these classes in UIMAv3. Without your changes, none of

[jira] [Assigned] (UIMA-6273) isBeforeV3 variable not reset in BinaryCasSerDes

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho reassigned UIMA-6273: Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho > isBeforeV3 variable not

[jira] [Work started] (UIMA-6273) isBeforeV3 variable not reset in BinaryCasSerDes

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on UIMA-6273 started by Richard Eckart de Castilho. > isBeforeV3 variable not reset in BinaryCasSerDes >

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-6273) isBeforeV3 variable not reset in BinaryCasSerDes

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-6273: - Fix Version/s: 3.2.0SDK > isBeforeV3 variable not reset in

[GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart opened a new pull request #68: [NO JIRA] Do not build on ASF Windows nodes

2020-10-16 Thread GitBox
reckart opened a new pull request #68: URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/68 ... there seems to be a problem with the "nohup" command not being found - no idea why This is an automated message from the Apache

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-6280) Migrate UIMA build repo to GitHub

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
Richard Eckart de Castilho created UIMA-6280: Summary: Migrate UIMA build repo to GitHub Key: UIMA-6280 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6280 Project: UIMA Issue

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-6278) Migrate UIMA Sandbox repo to GitHub

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-6278: - Component/s: Sandbox > Migrate UIMA Sandbox repo to GitHub >

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-6277) Migrate UIMA Addons repo to GitHub

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-6277: - Component/s: addons > Migrate UIMA Addons repo to GitHub >

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-6279) Migrate UIMA DUCC repo to GitHub

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
Richard Eckart de Castilho created UIMA-6279: Summary: Migrate UIMA DUCC repo to GitHub Key: UIMA-6279 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6279 Project: UIMA Issue

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-6277) Migrate UIMA Addons repo to GitHub

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
Richard Eckart de Castilho created UIMA-6277: Summary: Migrate UIMA Addons repo to GitHub Key: UIMA-6277 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6277 Project: UIMA Issue

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-6278) Migrate UIMA Sandbox repo to GitHub

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
Richard Eckart de Castilho created UIMA-6278: Summary: Migrate UIMA Sandbox repo to GitHub Key: UIMA-6278 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6278 Project: UIMA Issue

[jira] [Resolved] (UIMA-6244) test case bug, running in windows

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho resolved UIMA-6244. -- Resolution: Fixed > test case bug, running in windows >

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-6244) test case bug, running in windows

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-6244: - Fix Version/s: (was: 2.5.0SDK) > test case bug, running in windows >

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-6244) test case bug, running in windows

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-6244: - Fix Version/s: 2.10.5SDK > test case bug, running in windows >

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-6244) test case bug, running in windows

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17215653#comment-17215653 ] Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-6244: -- Was merged in commits

[jira] [Resolved] (UIMA-6249) remove sync contention in getJCasRegisteredType

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho resolved UIMA-6249. -- Resolution: Fixed > remove sync contention in getJCasRegisteredType >

[jira] [Resolved] (UIMA-6270) Add selectOverlapping to (J)CasUtil

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho resolved UIMA-6270. -- Resolution: Fixed > Add selectOverlapping to (J)CasUtil >

[GitHub] [uima-uimafit] reckart merged pull request #122: [UIMA-6270] Add selectOverlapping to (J)CasUtil

2020-10-16 Thread GitBox
reckart merged pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimafit/pull/122 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

[GitHub] [uima-uimaj] mjunsilo edited a comment on pull request #66: [UIMA 6273] isBeforeV3 variable not reset in BinaryCasSerDes

2020-10-16 Thread GitBox
mjunsilo edited a comment on pull request #66: URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/66#issuecomment-709963108 I actually don't have detailed understanding of this flag, except from what I have picked up from the comments. Marshall introduced it in 2016 with the following

[GitHub] [uima-uimaj] mjunsilo commented on pull request #66: [UIMA 6273] isBeforeV3 variable not reset in BinaryCasSerDes

2020-10-16 Thread GitBox
mjunsilo commented on pull request #66: URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/66#issuecomment-709963108 I actually don't have detailed understanding of this flag, except from what I have picked up from the comments. Marshall introduced it in 2016 with the following original

[jira] [Comment Edited] (UIMA-6274) Setting feature on builtin JCas cover class that was loaded before initializing TypeSystemImpl fails

2020-10-16 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17215279#comment-17215279 ] Serge Démoulin edited comment on UIMA-6274 at 10/16/20, 9:11 AM: - Is the

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-6274) Setting feature on builtin JCas cover class that was loaded before initializing TypeSystemImpl fails

2020-10-16 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17215279#comment-17215279 ] Serge Démoulin commented on UIMA-6274: -- Is the TYPESYSTEM_CONSOLIDATIO a feature or an optimization ?

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-6274) Setting feature on builtin JCas cover class that was loaded before initializing TypeSystemImpl fails

2020-10-16 Thread Jira
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17215263#comment-17215263 ] Serge Démoulin commented on UIMA-6274: -- The workaround works thank you. > Setting feature on builtin

[jira] [Work stopped] (UIMA-3386) Update add ons to parent pom 7

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on UIMA-3386 stopped by Richard Eckart de Castilho. > Update add ons to parent pom 7 >

[jira] [Work started] (UIMA-6276) Potential memory leak in FSClassRegistry

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on UIMA-6276 started by Richard Eckart de Castilho. > Potential memory leak in FSClassRegistry >

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-6274) Setting feature on builtin JCas cover class that was loaded before initializing TypeSystemImpl fails

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-6274: - Fix Version/s: 3.2.0SDK > Setting feature on builtin JCas cover class

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-6276) Potential memory leak in FSClassRegistry

2020-10-16 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)
Richard Eckart de Castilho created UIMA-6276: Summary: Potential memory leak in FSClassRegistry Key: UIMA-6276 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6276 Project: UIMA

[GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart commented on pull request #66: [UIMA 6273] isBeforeV3 variable not reset in BinaryCasSerDes

2020-10-16 Thread GitBox
reckart commented on pull request #66: URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/66#issuecomment-709877797 @mjunsilo In general, the fix looks good to me. It would be nice if we had a clearer idea under which circumstances not clearing this flag actually causes a problem so we could

[GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart commented on pull request #67: [UIMA-6274] Setting feature on builtin JCas cover class that was loaded before initializing TypeSystemImpl fails

2020-10-16 Thread GitBox
reckart commented on pull request #67: URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/67#issuecomment-709813358 @mischor instead of introducing another `createCallsiteForBuiltins` method, I was considering to add a check into the exiting `createCallsite` which would check if the given