On 25. Apr 2020, at 23:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
>
> no, you are correct, I am mistaken (about the license). A (hopefully)
> temporary
> confusion :-).
>
> At some point, it might make sense to converge on just a single xmlunit
> provider.
So as far as I can see, we do not use org.xmlunit
no, you are correct, I am mistaken (about the license). A (hopefully) temporary
confusion :-).
At some point, it might make sense to converge on just a single xmlunit
provider.
-Marshall
On 4/25/2020 3:19 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> On 25. Apr 2020, at 21:16, Marshall Schor
On 25. Apr 2020, at 21:16, Marshall Schor wrote:
>
> It looks like it has a license (a BSD form) which I think might require
> updating
> all the licenses / (maybe notices) for both source and binary distr.
In the source distribution, AFAIK we do not (have to) mention the licenses of
While reviewing the changes, I see "xmlunit" dependency was added to
uimaj-parent pom.
This is used to compare xml outputs, I believe.
It looks like it has a license (a BSD form) which I think might require updating
all the licenses / (maybe notices) for both source and binary distr.
There are
reckart opened a new pull request #38:
URL: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/pull/38
* [UIMA-6200] Constructing aggregate engines is slow
* [UIMA-6187] add eol=lf for .sh files
* [UIMA-6128] hook up xcas-1-1 to save
