[CANCEL][VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

Cancelling the vote due to issues found by Eddie and Marshall. Thanks to all who spent time checking RC1 Jerry

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

I see, the bug is in the .classpath. For some reason I thought that Eddie complained about finding this in a launch script (UIMA AS Deploy Service.launch). I will cancel RC1 soon. -jerry On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Burn Lewis wrote: > In examples/.classpath I see: >

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

and in "UIMA Deploy AS Service.launch" are three lines: Eddie On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Burn Lewis wrote: > In examples/.classpath I see: > path="UIMA_HOME/apache-activemq/lib/optional/xpp3-1.1.4.c.jar"/> > but the jar is named: >

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

In examples/.classpath I see: but the jar is named: apache-activemq/lib/optional/xpp3-1.1.4c.jar On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > Hmm, looks like a hole in my testing script I don't import runtime > configurations from uimaj-examples. I

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

Hmm, looks like a hole in my testing script I don't import runtime configurations from uimaj-examples. I only tested the two runtime configurations that are part of uima-as source which are UIMA Run Remote Async AE and UIMA Deploy AS Service. I can launch both from eclipse (Keppler) without an

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

After fixing the typo "xpp3-1.1.4.c.jar -> /xpp3-1.1.4c.jar" found a problem in the "UIMA Deploy AS Service" run configuration: it includes the uimaj-as projects which are not normally present with the examples project. After fixing that the Deploy (and the Run Remote) configuration works, as long

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

Downloaded the binary tarball on RHEL 6 Installed a fresh eclipse, Neon. Installed the uima-as-2.9.0 plugins Imported the uimaj-examples project and configured UIMA_HOME variable ==> Java Build Path problem: DescriptionResourcePathLocationType Project 'uimaj-examples' is missing

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

2.9.0 rc1 signatures OK compare source-release with svn - OK build from source (after clearing .m2 of uima-as folders) won't build with Java 8 and -Papache-release because of javadoc errors OK with Java 7 installed from Eclipse update site location OK, made an ae descriptor and a

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

NOTICE file for UIMA-AS line 2 says Copyright 2008, 2009. The 2nd year in the Copyright should be 2016, or it may be omitted. -Marshall

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

If you are referring to this line: Deploy_MeetingAnnotator.xml: Deploys C++ Meeting Annotator. It also says: "Note: requires installation of uimacpp SDK into $UIMA_HOME." -jerry On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > The README lists sample deployment

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

README file issues: The line "For up-to-date information on UIMA-AS issues, see our issue tracker: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12327044=Html=12310570 actually seems to be pointing to the version 2.8.1 release info... typo - "service" spelled "servic" on line

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

The README lists sample deployment descriptors in examples/deploy/as/... and includes "Deploy_MeetingAnnotator", but that is missing from the examples/deploy/as in the binary distribution (and maybe elsewhere).

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

Indeed, this shows as Open although the fix is in RC1. Forgot to close this JIRA. My mistake. Will close it now against 2.9.0 and if this RC gets approved I will mention this omission in the Release Announcement. -jerry On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

Issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5189 is marked Unresolved, but also marked that its Fix Version is this release. This seems inconsistent? What's the story about this issue? There are no "comments" about it in the issue. -Marshall

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

- OK: on Red Hat Linux downloaded & unzipped uima-as-2.9.0-bin.zip - OK: followed README instructions to > setup environment variables > adjust examples paths > start broker

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

- Signatures (md5, sha1) - OK - Built from source - OK - jira-report - OK - the list is not sorted on a Key (JIRA#) - README & Release Notes- OK - License & Notice - OK - UIMA-AS Eclipse plugins - OK - UIMA-AS Eclipse example runtime configurations - OK - Example scripts from /bin:

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

But what is the purpose of this test? Currently it expects the major version numbers to match, and prints a misleading error message if they don't. Are we sure that UIMA-AS 2.9.0 will work with any V2 UIMA? Or should the test be for the version of core UIMA that UIMA-AS includes, and has been

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

I did find a "small" bug in the code that logs a message when versions don't match. Its only effecting logging in this particular case where I chose v 3.0.0 as the next version for UIMA-AS. I think the RC1 should not be taken down for this reason. In RC1 both uimaj and uima-as are at 2.9.0 and

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

Ah - OK. So you're saying, this RC is (possibly) good, and we should go ahead and test it, etc., and you'll fix the "next" release RC later, right? -Marshall On 11/22/2016 3:57 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > Marshall, this is caused by me choosing next version to be 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT > when doing

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

Marshall, this is caused by me choosing next version to be 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT when doing mvn release:prepare -DautoVersionSubmodules The UIMA-AS code does this check: if (UimaAsVersion.getMajorVersion() != UimaVersion.getMajorVersion()) { I will choose 2.9.1 as the next version when doing

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

hmmm, the latest Jenkins build is showing 4 test failures? -Marshall