lived up to its potential and I'm
> kinda sad to move upstairs to the attic.
>
> Dave
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 6:40 PM Michael Russo wrote:
>
> > This vote has passed. I'll continue the process of moving Usergrid to the
> > Attic.
> > Thanks everyone for the s
:40 PM Michael Russo wrote:
> This vote has passed. I'll continue the process of moving Usergrid to the
> Attic.
> Thanks everyone for the support and contributions over the years! It's been
> a pleasure
> working on the project.
>
> -Russo
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 12:3
This vote has passed. I'll continue the process of moving Usergrid to the
Attic.
Thanks everyone for the support and contributions over the years! It's been
a pleasure
working on the project.
-Russo
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 12:34 AM Bobby Nielsen
wrote:
> +1
>
> Den fre. 3. dec. 2021
+1
Den fre. 3. dec. 2021 kl. 01.23 skrev Dave :
> +1
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 12:10 PM Rod Simpson wrote:
>
> > +1
> > On Dec 2, 2021, 10:05 AM -0700, Michael Russo ,
> wrote:
> > > (trying this again as the first email didn't seem to get delivered to
> the
> > > mailing list)
> > >
> > >
+1
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 12:10 PM Rod Simpson wrote:
> +1
> On Dec 2, 2021, 10:05 AM -0700, Michael Russo , wrote:
> > (trying this again as the first email didn't seem to get delivered to the
> > mailing list)
> >
> > Following the process outlined here,
>
+1
On Dec 2, 2021, 10:05 AM -0700, Michael Russo , wrote:
> (trying this again as the first email didn't seem to get delivered to the
> mailing list)
>
> Following the process outlined here, https://attic.apache.org/process.html,
> I'm calling a vote to move Usergrid to the Attic.
>
> There have
(trying this again as the first email didn't seem to get delivered to the
mailing list)
Following the process outlined here, https://attic.apache.org/process.html,
I'm calling a vote to move Usergrid to the Attic.
There have been no contributions in the last year and only a couple in the
year
Following the process outlined here, https://attic.apache.org/process.html,
I'm calling a vote for us to move Usergrid to the Attic.
There have been no contributions in the last year and only a couple in the
year before that. There's no active development or maintenance of the
project. Given this
Hi,
On 2018/09/13 12:28:08, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote:
> ...it would be really helpful to see a board report submitted...
The Board did discuss Usergrid in yesterday's meeting, and we didn't get a
report.
The Usergrid PMC, needs to provide a report next month and indicate what's
going on
Hi,
On 2018/08/22 16:58:48, Todd Nine wrote:
> This vote has received the required 3 -1 votes to not move to the Attic.
> Therefore, the vote does not pass.
In light of this result to the attic vote it would be really helpful to see a
board report submitted mentioning at least that the vote
Thanks, Dave!
--
Rod Simpson
On August 24, 2018 at 1:16:38 PM, Dave (snoopd...@gmail.com) wrote:
Docs are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/usergrid/Usergrid+Committers+Guide
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:32 PM Todd Nine wrote:
> Hi Rod,
> I can't seem to find the
Docs are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/usergrid/Usergrid+Committers+Guide
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:32 PM Todd Nine wrote:
> Hi Rod,
> I can't seem to find the documentation either. The process IIRC is the
> following.
>
> 1) Check out the apache source git, not github
Ok, new dumb questions:
1. What is the url for the Apache git?
2. I assume I need to upload my ssh key somewhere (for apache git) - anyone
know where? Dave?
I'm going to try to review these outstanding PRs. I have told through
other channels that some of them may have already been merged (and
Hi Rod,
I can't seem to find the documentation either. The process IIRC is the
following.
1) Check out the apache source git, not github
2) Pull down the PR branch from GH into a local branch after you're
satisfied with the review
3) Squash merge into the apache master locally, and reference
I just looked through the docs and I don't see anything about how we accept
PRs. I remember that we couldn't just "accept" the PR in github. Is that
true? If so, did we document the process somewhere?
Rod
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Rod Simpson wrote:
> It looks like we do have a bit
>From my understanding of the situation, that's not an accurate
characterization of what's happened here. All that's happened is that a
group that is working on a private fork of Usergrid has come forward to
start contributing their work back into the project for the purpose of
invigorating it.
+1 to Todd's valid concerns about transparency and visibility.
All decisions and most discussions* about the project should be public via
email or JIRA.
Dave
* there are some exceptions for new committer, PMC member and security
vulnerabily discussions, please refer to the policies documented
This vote has received the required 3 -1 votes to not move to the Attic.
Therefore, the vote does not pass.
I'm thrilled that UG is getting some attention, and development is
continuing. However, this seems to be happening in isolation without the
visibility the Apache process prefers. If I
-1 (since Keyur mentioned continued future contributions)
-1 (in light of the continued planned support)
Mike
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:48 PM Rod Simpson wrote:
> Mailing list has been very quiet on this. New contributors are advised to
> use the list to communicate (both for intentions and feedback).
>
> -1 in light of new information.
>
> Long
-1 vote
It looks like there are some fresh contributions coming to Usergrid (new
posting to the dev mailing list). I'll also contribute by reviewing some of
the upcoming pull requests.
Michael Russo | Software Engineer | russomich...@google.com | +1 (650)
946-8608
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at
-1 (given Keyur's email about planned commits)
On 2018/08/20 19:00:06, Rod Simpson wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Todd Nine wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Following the process outlined here, https://attic.apache.org/process.html
> > ,
> > I'm calling a vote for us to move
Mailing list has been very quiet on this. New contributors are advised to
use the list to communicate (both for intentions and feedback).
-1 in light of new information.
Long live Usergrid!
--
Rod Simpson
On August 21, 2018 at 4:46:27 PM, Ed Anuff (e...@anuff.com) wrote:
-1 vote
On Tue,
-1 vote
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:42 PM Michael Russo
wrote:
> -1 vote
>
> It looks like there are some fresh contributions coming to Usergrid (new
> posting to the dev mailing list). I'll also contribute by reviewing some of
> the upcoming pull requests.
>
> -Michael
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018
-1 vote
It looks like there are some fresh contributions coming to Usergrid (new
posting to the dev mailing list). I'll also contribute by reviewing some of
the upcoming pull requests.
-Michael
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:22 PM Ed Anuff wrote:
> Sounds like there are some incoming pull requests
Sounds like there are some incoming pull requests coming shortly (upgrading
C* and ES). Should know more in a day or so.
Ed
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Todd Nine wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following the process outlined here, https://attic.apache.org/process.html
> ,
> I'm calling a vote for
+1
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Todd Nine wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following the process outlined here, https://attic.apache.org/process.html,
> I'm calling a vote for us to move Usergrid to the Attic.
>
> We appealed to the user community for contributions before our last board
> report,
+1
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Todd Nine wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following the process outlined here, https://attic.apache.org/process.html
> ,
> I'm calling a vote for us to move Usergrid to the Attic.
>
> We appealed to the user community for contributions before our last board
> report,
Hey all,
Following the process outlined here, https://attic.apache.org/process.html,
I'm calling a vote for us to move Usergrid to the Attic.
We appealed to the user community for contributions before our last board
report, however no contributions have occurred over the last 3 months.
Given
I agree with Rod's sentiments. I'd be happy to review any PRs that you
submit. It would be fantastic to breath some life back into the project.
In terms of multi region ES, this is not possible within ES itself since ES
does not support it natively. Instead, the indexing module uses a queueing
This sounds great. I believe all documentation is either on the website (
usergrid.org), or amongst the code itself (in the form of comments and
readme files).
Can you clarify what you mean by Cassandra Multi-site deployments? I assume
you are referring to a multi-region cluster. This should
bump!
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Fouad Omri wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
> we are planning to extend the usergrid platform:
> 1) deployment on Kubernetes using Helm charts
> 2) Cassandra Multi-Site Deployment and upgrade of Cassandra and
> elasticseach versions
> 3)
Hello Dave,
we are planning to extend the usergrid platform:
1) deployment on Kubernetes using Helm charts
2) Cassandra Multi-Site Deployment and upgrade of Cassandra and
elasticseach versions
3) Enhance Notification using Firebase Cloud Messaging
4) Upgrade to Spring boot and Spring Cloud
Can
Usergrid friends,
We had a conversation about this on the private mailing list, but we need
to discuss here in the open.
It seems that, while we do have a good number of committers and PMC
members, we do not have any developers actively working on the project or
any volunteers willing manage a
34 matches
Mail list logo