Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Velocity Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by SergeKnystautas:
http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/PoweredByVelocity
-
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Velocity Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by OliverKohll:
http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/PoweredByVelocity
The comment on the change is:
GT portalBase added
--
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1. (sorry!)
There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro have
size of 0KB. In the source distro, typing "ant docs" also produces bad
docs.
Claude, this seems to be some issue with DVSL. It looks like the 2.x
b
On 6/29/07, Claude Brisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tested it in a real webapp and it seems ok...
The new api is really much cleaner than the 1.x, that's a pleasure to
use it!
good to hear!
There are some small developments I'd like to commit in but they are not
ready and will wait for th
I tested it in a real webapp and it seems ok...
The new api is really much cleaner than the 1.x, that's a pleasure to
use it!
There are some small developments I'd like to commit in but they are not
ready and will wait for the 2.1 release.
so,
+1
One remark: when fully rebuilding I saw that the
Ok, I change my vote to a +1. Don't want to hold up progress here. After
all, it's an alpha. Anyone who uses this and complains about missing docs
will get support on the list.
does this really matter for an *alpha*, especially when none of the
docs have been updated and so many of them are
On 6/29/07, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan Bubna-3 wrote:
>
> VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
>
Why not user the same version number like Velocity?
never done it before. all Tools 1.x releases are (i believe
compatible with all 1.3+ Eng
Nathan Bubna-3 wrote:
>
> VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
>
Why not user the same version number like Velocity?
This way it would be much simpler for the users to match versions. E.g.
they would intuitively use Velcity 1.6 with VelocityTools 1.6.
Ahmed.
