Re: ApacheCon NA 2017

> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Christopher Schultz > wrote: > > But I'm > perfectly happy to stand up in front of people and talk about technology. +1! Do it! > > Is anyone else planning to attend? Would anyone be willing to present? > > Thanks, > -chris >

Re: Velocity Macro Stack Traces Patch

On Oct 10, 2012, at 9:22 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Meanwhile, neither of you have made a contribution through this discussion :( It is important that Apache projects and their contributors understand Apache policies for contributions. I'm sorry if you don't agree,

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Engine 1.6

+1 On Nov 28, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote: Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were worth generating a new test build and delaying this (IMO), so i'm moving on to a vote. The test build candidate for release is still available here:

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-beta3

+1 (And don't end it early even w/ 3 +1s :) geir On Nov 30, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: Ok, Will said the new test build works for him; it is still available here: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-beta3/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-beta3

appreciate a good reason at the least. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 (And don't end it early even w/ 3 +1s :) geir On Nov 30, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: Ok, Will said the new test build works for him; it is still available here

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-beta3

was over 3 days ago. The odds of what you describe seem low, and the cost would be two separate site updates, for which have high odds of being the greater trouble. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that the more the merrier on things like

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-beta3

stuff (home page, download page, etc) updated for every release i do. if the Tools 2.0-beta3 release happens pretty much the same time as Engine 1.6, then i only have to update the site once for both. saves me some headache. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 2.0-beta3

for testing, or should we call this beta vote closed and release the darn thing? On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we all know why On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: and Henning for that matter, since lately i have had to resort

Re: What is schmoo

:) just text to be rendered as is geir On Oct 6, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Byron Foster wrote: What is this term 'schmoo' I see in the code comments? as in: /* * if this reference is escaped (\$foo) then we want to do one of two * things : 1) if this is a reference in the context, then we want

Re: Call a velocity macro

Steven, Don't judge this community by this thread - we have a long history of constructive and positive collaborative development. Give it another chance. geir On Mar 10, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Yates Family wrote: I take my hat off to all current, previous and prospective OS developers.

Re: Call a velocity macro

Jonathan, Knock it off. It's 2008. You've been unsuccessfully charging this windmill for 7 or 8 years now, and you still can't remain civil in a conversation. Go away, please. geir On Mar 9, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Jonathan Revusky wrote: Adrian Tarau wrote: Jonathan, Basic common sense?

Re: Call a velocity macro

Wait - that's not true You certainly can do scoped velocimacros... geir On Feb 21, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: I'm pretty sure #local is still just in Geir's whiteboard

Re: Call a velocity macro

There was something really sucky about it, which is why I didn't move it forward. I forget why it was bad... geir On Feb 20, 2008, at 5:16 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: I'm pretty sure #local is still just in Geir's whiteboard section. No one has ever gotten it promoted out of there. I've

Re: svn commit: r579331 - in /velocity/engine/trunk/src: java/org/apache/velocity/util/introspection/UberspectImpl.java test/org/apache/velocity/test/ForeachTestCase.java

what if it returns something you can't iterate over? Maybe check the return type first? geir On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: On 9/25/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, Nathan -- you are on a tear. Nice work. well, i found a little time to work on some

Re: DVSL

On May 12, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Claude Brisson wrote: Hi. DVSL a small and simple project that slept for quite a long time but it can be quite handy for small XML transformation tasks. I think it deserves at least a 1.0 release. Me too! Since nobody is handling this project, and since I

Re: [Fwd: Incubation of the Click Project at the Apache Software Foundation]

yeah, sorry - I have zero time right now... On Apr 6, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, thanks. According to the current discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED], it seems that actually all mentors must be members. As Daniel and Geir are currently probably pretty busy, we will

Re: update on site issues

Sorry - forgot the smiley :) geir On Feb 10, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Feb 9, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: Don't get too excited yet. So, i gave up on trying to get the site plugin to generate the index.html page with the news macro. Instead, i commented out

Re: update on site issues

I fixed the group. You should be good to go. If not, bellow again... geir On Feb 8, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: I've made some progress with building the site. I've managed to get maven (2.0.6-snapshot) to build the web site successfully on my local machine with the exception of

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: because Maven2 has issues and that's what the current site is being built with. i've tried to get it working on my machine, but no luck yet. Then I'd argue this shouldn't be our

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote: On 1/30/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 30, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: ... As a compromise, I'd like to propose to keep the 1.5 release and call it Release candidate in the same way as httpd

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:52 AM, Will Glass-Husain wrote: Hi, Knew I'd be unpopular the moment I hit send. You did the right thing. This is what the oversight processes here at the ASF are about. Three quick notes. 1) don't think the changes are big. But I think the distro should be

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

On Jan 31, 2007, at 3:48 AM, Will Glass-Husain wrote: I thought about this a little more. There's a couple things we can do that I'd support. (1) Figure out a way to call this release something other than Velocity 1.5, e.g. Velocity 1.5rc1 and issue the release immediately. Can we do this

Re: svn commit: r500648 - /velocity/engine/branches/Velocity_1.5_BRANCH/

for clarifying. The 1.6 was a typo. geir On 1/29/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Isn't that redundant Velocity_1.6_BRANCH? it's in the velocity project, in the branches directory... how about 1.5? [...] Added: velocity

Re: Automatic Site rebuild

can't other people build the docs? On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:24 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, quick idea: As we will not get the zone on time and I will leave at least my mail server running and connected to the internet, I could set up a once daily / twice daily build on that

Re: [VOTE]: Release Velocity 1.5

. Schmiedehausen wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I assume we'll have another vote on the final binary? geir Do we need to? The code itself will not change, just some doc file, change logs etc. Best regards Henning On Jan 27, 2007, at 3:52 AM

Re: [VOTE]: Release Velocity 1.5

On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 1/27/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Normally yes - you vote on the final software that's going to be released, not just the concept. snip/ Indeed. I'd also like to see velocity votes (as am catching up on ML reading

Re: [VOTE]: Release Velocity 1.5

On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Normally yes - you vote on the final software that's going to be released, not just the concept. At the moment, I have no clue what would actually go out the door wrt the binary

Re: [VOTE]: Release Velocity 1.5

PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/27/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Normally yes - you vote on the final software that's going to be released, not just the concept. At the moment, I have no clue what would actually go out the door wrt

Re: svn commit: r500648 - /velocity/engine/branches/Velocity_1.5_BRANCH/

Isn't that redundant Velocity_1.6_BRANCH? it's in the velocity project, in the branches directory... how about 1.5? geir On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: henning Date: Sat Jan 27 14:39:05 2007 New Revision: 500648 URL:

Re: Get ready for CfV

What are the high points to be mentioned? On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Let's see... ...the first release of one of the most popular templating engines in the java world since more than two years... I'd say yes. We

Re: is Texen orphaned?

Will Glass-Husain wrote: Hi, Apparently, the main example in the Texen docs in Velocity 1.4 is broken. Geir broke it in early 2002, and Shinobu found and fixed the problem in early 2005. So while this has been fixed for 1.5, for the past couple of years the docs for the released version 1.4