Ok, the fix is on the 1.6.x branch. I've re-run javacc so all you
need to do is build.
669 does not affect the 1.6.x branch.
On Jan 20, 2009, at 10:34 , Claude Brisson wrote:
Ah, 669 also, no?
On mar, 2009-01-20 at 07:49 -0700, Byron Foster wrote:
Let me know if we should include the fix
Ah, 669 also, no?
On mar, 2009-01-20 at 07:49 -0700, Byron Foster wrote:
> Let me know if we should include the fix for VELOCITY-667 in 1.6.2,
> I'll move the changes over to 1.6.2 branch if so...
>
> On Jan 18, 2009, at 13:46 , Claude Brisson wrote:
>
> > It's here :
> >
> > http://people.apa
Yes, since it is a fix for a regression, that'd great. Since there was
also 666 and 668 around, it'd better if you do the merge, I'll take care
of javacc.
Claude
On mar, 2009-01-20 at 07:49 -0700, Byron Foster wrote:
> Let me know if we should include the fix for VELOCITY-667 in 1.6.2,
> I'll
Let me know if we should include the fix for VELOCITY-667 in 1.6.2,
I'll move the changes over to 1.6.2 branch if so...
On Jan 18, 2009, at 13:46 , Claude Brisson wrote:
It's here :
http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/engine/1.6.2/
I'll launch the vote in a few days if no one chimes
It's here :
http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/engine/1.6.2/
I'll launch the vote in a few days if no one chimes in.
Claude
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
