GitHub user Rowandjj opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/97
remove unnecessary nested frameLayout in embed
@sospartan
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Rowandjj/incubator-weex
Github user fkysly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/81
This change has been included in the pr #96 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user fkysly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/96
* [jsfm] merge jsfm-feature-0.19
jsfm v0.19.14
revert rax to 0.1.0
update vue to 2.2.1-weex.1
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user fkysly closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/95
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/94
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user acton393 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/94
* [ios] bugfix incorrect code
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/acton393/incubator-weex dev
Alternatively you can review
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/86
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/80
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/pull/71
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Everyone who contributes to Weex should be a committer, yes. We recommend
that 2-3 patches is enough for new projects. And most projects have a "low
barrier of entry". All contributions beyond simple typos and one/two-liner
bug fixes, needs to have an Individual Contributor License Agreement
You mean every body in at least our current develop team should/will have a
'committer' permission?
I agree with you that CTR is ideal model when our project has 'enough' eyeballs
and tests. But for now, I'm still worrying about the quality.
Most of us, including me, have a really bad old habit:
Not me, this need some C++/C-guys to work this out. I don't speak C any
longer.
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Adam Feng wrote:
> Seems to be amazing. @sospartan do you have any plan to do this? Or
> anyone volunteer?
>
> On 2017年3月11日 +0800 AM1:03, 大诗胸
Seems to be amazing. @sospartan do you have any plan to do this? Or anyone
volunteer?
On 2017年3月11日 +0800 AM1:03, 大诗胸 , wrote:
> The answer is yes. We can access java native object in ndk, and ndk can
> access V8 javascript object. It's a lot of work to convert to each
Here is the reason why we decided do RTC:
We wanna make sure every modification is reviewed by another people. And
avoid commit any feature without discuss with teammate. We use this to
minimize the low-level bug. We do realize RTC will slow down the
development,but we think it will be worth
14 matches
Mail list logo