Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-08 Thread Matt Sicker
Thanks for digging in! I never expected deliverability problems in this direction before, but the root cause makes sense. On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 9:32 AM Craig Russell wrote: > > That would explain it. Case closed. Thanks for analyzing the logs. > > Craig > > > On Jun 8, 2022, at 07:13, sebb

Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-08 Thread Craig Russell
That would explain it. Case closed. Thanks for analyzing the logs. Craig > On Jun 8, 2022, at 07:13, sebb wrote: > > Infra made a change to a mailbox size limit which caused problems for > the mail system. > > The Whimsy mail.log has lots of messages such as: > > fatal: main.cf

Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-08 Thread sebb
Infra made a change to a mailbox size limit which caused problems for the mail system. The Whimsy mail.log has lots of messages such as: fatal: main.cf configuration error: mailbox_size_limit is smaller than message_size_limit These errors started at Jun 6 02:26:54 and stopped at Jun 7

Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-08 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Sebb, I've privately forwarded the four ICLAs mentioned in my previous email. These did eventually show up in secretary workbench after more than a day. > Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > ICLA 05:56 85KB > Invitation to become

Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-08 Thread sebb
AFAICT the new entries in the workbench were all created recently. When I wrote, I'm pretty sure that there were no outstanding emails. Unfortunately I did not keep the data I used. Maybe there was a delay in sending some of the mails. If you have got some examples that you think should have

Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-07 Thread Craig Russell
After 30 hour outage, the workbench is back. What happened? Craig > On Jun 7, 2022, at 13:13, Craig Russell wrote: > > Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra... > > Craig > >> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> Sorry for not replying all... >>

Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-07 Thread Craig Russell
Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra... Craig > On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell wrote: > > Sorry for not replying all... > > There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in since > yesterday. > > I cannot troubleshoot this one... >

Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-07 Thread Craig Russell
Sorry for not replying all... There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in since yesterday. I cannot troubleshoot this one... Craig > On Jun 6, 2022, at 16:14, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > I see these in my inbox to secretary: > > subject/date (PDT)/size >

Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-06 Thread sebb
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:08, Craig Russell wrote: > > while several ICLAs have been received. The workbench only displays emails that have attachments and that are not marked as deleted. AFAICT there are no such emails. > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org >

Secretary workbench has nothing to do

2022-06-06 Thread Craig Russell
while several ICLAs have been received. Craig L Russell c...@apache.org