Re: board agenda needs better handling of discussion

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > The discussion section copies the entire discussion section to the minutes, > thereby creating a second copy of the discussion section. It also mangles > tabular data. Sounds like one or more bugs. The original

board agenda needs better handling of discussion

The discussion section copies the entire discussion section to the minutes, thereby creating a second copy of the discussion section. It also mangles tabular data. It would probably be best if the minutes were simply blank and the only thing in the minutes are what secretary types during the

bug in board agenda for non-standard resolutions

The February meeting had two non-standard resolutions: 7A and 7B. These resolutions were voted on and passed unanimously and so recorded in the whimsy tool. But the minutes showed them as tabled. Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo

Re: board agenda guests with annotations

Oh, one more thing. Name in Roll Call section of the agenda not exactly matching public name is a far more common use case than external guest. - Sam Ruby On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Craig Russell

Re: board agenda guests with annotations

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > >> On Feb 21, 2018, at 6:23 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >>> The board agenda included a guest with a parenthetical

Re: board agenda guests with annotations

> On Feb 21, 2018, at 6:23 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> The board agenda included a guest with a parenthetical annotation. When I >> brought up the roll call the guest did not appear. I entered

Re: board: r81936 - /foundation/board/board_minutes_2018_02_21.txt

Hi Greg, > On Feb 21, 2018, at 7:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Hi Craig, > > Looks like the Fundraising report got demolished by improper tag > matching. Wow. just Wow. Pretty spectacular. It will take a bit of time to fix this one And I also noticed that the FY23 budget

Re: Typos on Member Watch List

Thanks! Harbs > On Feb 22, 2018, at 12:13 PM, sebb wrote: > > Fixed > > On 22 February 2018 at 09:11, Harbs wrote: >> Bertrand's recent email got me poking around the watch list section of >> Whimsy. Cool stuff! >> >> I noticed a couple of typos. I just

Re: Typos on Member Watch List

Fixed On 22 February 2018 at 09:11, Harbs wrote: > Bertrand's recent email got me poking around the watch list section of > Whimsy. Cool stuff! > > I noticed a couple of typos. I just made a Github pull request to fix one of > them, but another I'm not sure what the intention