Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

<mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org <mailto:dev@wicket.apache.org> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2018 16:48:18 Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

gets fired; >>>> >>>> even JQuery guys are plagued by this and have no real solution to it now >>>> IMHO https://github.com/jquery/jquery/issues/3271 >>>> >>>> I think we can get a real working one for wicket but had no time yet to >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

S resources (defered or not) so that the page itself cant break because of this - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2018 16:48:18 Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

an.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 to release for M9 > > >> > > >> IMHO a warning should be added with regards to WICKET-6498 as it is > not > > >> yet working in a reliable way but may break depending on client > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

t; > >>> I think we can get a real working one for wicket but had no time yet to > >>> try it out; Idea is to create the wicket object in the head at first > >> inline > >>> script before any JS resources (defered or not) so that the page itself > >>> cant

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

ow >>> IMHO https://github.com/jquery/jquery/issues/3271 >>> >>> I think we can get a real working one for wicket but had no time yet to >>> try it out; Idea is to create the wicket object in the head at first >> inline >>> script before any JS re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

; inline > > script before any JS resources (defered or not) so that the page itself > > cant break because of this > > > > > > - Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > > Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com> > > > An: dev@wicket.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

s (defered or not) so that the page itself > cant break because of this > > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2018 16:48:18 > > Bet

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

18 16:48:18 > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 > Hi, > > I need your help. what's exactly the caveat about WICKET-6498? It uses > javascript events that might not be supported buy browser? > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Korbinian Bachl < > korbin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

üngliche Mail - > > > Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com> > > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Februar 2018 17:34:08 > > > Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 > > > > > This is a vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

tag, 11. Februar 2018 17:34:08 > > Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 > > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 > > > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > > linked below. > > > > I have included

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

Hi Andrea, that's a good idea. WICKET-6189 is another contender for mentioning in the release notes. Sven ⁣Gesendet mit Blue ​ Am 12. Feb. 2018, 12:50, um 12:50, Andrea Del Bene schrieb: >Sorry, when I said "change log" I actually meant the release note. > >On Mon, Feb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

+1 Tested: 1) signatures 2) my main app On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > +1 > > Tested: > 1) signatures > 2) build from sources > 3) our main app > > > I would slightly modify build script > Right now I'm getting > > sha256sum -c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

net> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Februar 2018 21:24:53 > > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 > > > Hi, > > > > JavaScriptDeferHeaderResponse is an *alternative* to > > JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderRespo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

Sorry, when I said "change log" I actually meant the release note. On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Sven Meier wrote: > >> Hi Andrea, >> >> read here: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

Hi, On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Sven Meier wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > read here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration > +to+Wicket+8.0#MigrationtoWicket8.0-Application'sIHeaderResp > onseDecoratorASFJIRAkey,summary,type,created,updated, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

ng in a reliable way but may break depending on client specifics; - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Februar 2018 17:34:08 Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 This is a vote t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

rote: >> >>> +1 to release for M9 >>> >>> IMHO a warning should be added with regards to WICKET-6498 as it is not >>> yet working in a reliable way but may break depending on client specifics; >>> >>> - Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

thanks a lot Sven! - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Februar 2018 21:24:53 > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 > Hi, > > JavaScriptD

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

gt; IMHO a warning should be added with regards to WICKET-6498 as it is not yet >>> working in a reliable way but may break depending on client specifics; >>> >>> - Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >>>> Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com> >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

17:34:08 Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 Please download the source distributions found in our staging area linked below. I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote lasts for 72 hours minimum. [ ] Yes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

working in a reliable way but may break depending on client specifics; - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Andrea Del Bene" <an.delb...@gmail.com> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Februar 2018 17:34:08 Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 This is a vote t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

rg > Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. Februar 2018 17:34:08 > Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures f

[VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 Please download the source distributions found in our staging area linked below. I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote lasts for 72 hours minimum. [ ] Yes, release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9 [ ] No, don't release