Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-17 Thread Martin Grigorov
https://github.com/martin-g/dotfiles/blob/master/bin/github-pr.sh I'll try it next time we receive a pull request Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > signing a CLA is for Apache's secretary > I doubt they will merge your patc

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
signing a CLA is for Apache's secretary I doubt they will merge your patches :) I will write the script soon Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Martin Funk wrote: > If signing the CLA raises the chance that the author info doesn't get > lost, quite

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-13 Thread Martin Funk
If signing the CLA raises the chance that the author info doesn't get lost, quite some people might be interested in doing so. mf Am 13.02.2014 um 13:40 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > As long as the PR is recorded on a wicket.apache.org list (for wicket PR's > of course), it should be OK-provided

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-13 Thread Martijn Dashorst
As long as the PR is recorded on a wicket.apache.org list (for wicket PR's of course), it should be OK-provided the patch is small. This could be dev@or commits@. It should be traceable on Apache controlled hardware. If anyone wishes to contribute often, it would be easier to send a signed CLA to

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-13 Thread Martin Grigorov
compare to: wget http://.../pr/8.patch git am 8.patch git commit -a && git push both can be automated with some .sh script but GitHub UI is not very friendly - it doesn't give you easy way to copy the author's name and her branch I tried once https://github.com/github/hub but it failed too ...

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-13 Thread Martin Funk
several steps git remote add foo git fetch foo git checkout -b foo/ git rebase master git checkout master git merge foo/ git push ... either way, what is the Apache policy on that? Shouldn't each and every code snipped be signed of to meet Apache Licence mf Am 12.02.2014 um 21:44 sch

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-12 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Martin Funk wrote: > > Pull Requests are still not supported. > But they could be pulled to local and then pushed to the apache repo by > core commiters, right? > Right, but it involves "manual" work in several steps. For me the easiest way is to add '.patch' to

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-12 Thread Martin Funk
> Pull Requests are still not supported. But they could be pulled to local and then pushed to the apache repo by core commiters, right? mf Am 12.02.2014 um 09:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > Don't get too excited :) > It is just about mail notifications and comments in JIRA/GitHub. > Pull Reques

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-12 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Appears to work already! Martijn On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7304 > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Martijn Dashorst < > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-12 Thread Martin Grigorov
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7304 Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Martijn Dashorst < martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > What do we want? github integration! How much do we want it? All of it! > When do we want it? now! > >

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-12 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 What do we want? github integration! How much do we want it? All of it! When do we want it? now! On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and > > We want all of it, right ?! > >

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-12 Thread Martin Grigorov
Don't get too excited :) It is just about mail notifications and comments in JIRA/GitHub. Pull Requests are still not supported. Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Santo Raso wrote: > Finally > > > 2014-02-12 9:00 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Thomerson : >

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-12 Thread Santo Raso
Finally 2014-02-12 9:00 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Thomerson : > Yes! > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Martin Grigorov >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Just noticed > > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and > > > > We want all of it, right ?! > > > > Martin

Re: Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-12 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Yes! On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > Just noticed > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and > > We want all of it, right ?! > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettrainin

Apache + GitHub step 1

2014-02-11 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, Just noticed https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and We want all of it, right ?! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting