+1 to rename current wicket to wicket-core
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 to rename current wicket into wicket-core
-igor
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
With
+1
Juergen
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
+1 to rename current wicket to wicket-core
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 to rename current wicket into wicket-core
-igor
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at
+1 I guess
Please say if I've understood it correctly. By this proposal:
- wicket (from the 1.4 perspective) will be split into three modules,
wicket-core, wicket-util, wicket-request;
- a 'new' wicket.jar will be created to aggregate the three (well,
just like the 'old' wicket.jar), easing
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, tetsuo ronald.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 I guess
Please say if I've understood it correctly. By this proposal:
- wicket (from the 1.4 perspective) will be split into three modules,
wicket-core, wicket-util, wicket-request;
- a 'new' wicket.jar will be
about the new name : IResourceContribution ?
about the application:
it is ready - it shows resource grouping (i.e. serving several resources in
one http request) and filtering (load .css in head and .js after /body).
I have a question though: the application uses jquery which has nice MIT
If we rename wicket to wicket-core what will be the name of the _current_
wicket-core module?
Am 22.12.2010 um 12:33 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, tetsuo ronald.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 I guess
Please say if I've understood it correctly. By this
+1
Tested building it, the quickstart, and various examples in wicket-examples.
All is fine.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
[+1] Yes, release
I've tested
Dear all,
Do you think it would be a good idea to have a fixed place where maven
artifacts are deployed when a release vote is called. E.g. current
1.4.15 voting is pointing to:
Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/~jrthomerson/wicket-1.4.15/m2-repo
and probably next will be
Maven repo:
Hi,
Symlinks will not work. I just tried:
[mgrigo...@minotaur:~/public_html/repo]$ ls -la
total 7
drwxrwxr-x 2 mgrigorov wicket 3 Dec 22 13:21 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 mgrigorov mgrigorov 3 Dec 22 13:18 ..
lrwxr-xr-x 1 mgrigorov wicket 43 Dec 22 13:21 latest -
-1, sounds very confusing to me. I was just looking for something
last night in the source. It was something that I assumed would be in
the core of the framework, but I had to look in wicket-util for it.
I don't like that. If it's required to run Wicket, then it should be
part of the core.
On
Unfortunately, the part you are objecting to is not a part of this ticket.
It was done a long time ago on trunk. This ticket is only about making
dependency management easier on the non-maven folks. If you'd rather see all
three (now sort of four) modules re-combined, I think it'd be better to
I'm objecting to continuing down the path of what has happened in trunk. :)
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the part you are objecting to is not a part of this ticket.
It was done a long time ago on trunk. This ticket is only
Martin,
Isn't it possible to use the same Wicket's SVN for that? That is
create a repo under SVN and do store the pre-releases there? Or maybe
use an external google code project only for that?
IMHO having this could help a bit people trying to test new releases.
Regards,
Ernesto
On Wed, Dec
+1 to release
-igor
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.15. This is a bugfix release on the
1.4.x (stable) branch.
Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.15/
Artifacts:
i started the import here:
https://github.com/wicketstuff/wicketstuff
-igor
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
So we're all set and currently running a test import. Once we validate
that the test import is correct, we'll do the final import.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
i started the import here:
https://github.com/wicketstuff/wicketstuff
-igor
I removed everyone from the SF.net project except Igor, Martijn, and myself.
I took SVN commit permissions away from the three of us.
I received an error message that the import has failed.
Martijn
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
i started the import here:
gah. i will try a manual one and see if that goes better. can you
forward the error message to me, i didnt get one...
-igor
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
I received an error message that the import has failed.
Martijn
On Thu, Dec 23,
18 matches
Mail list logo
