I'm objecting to continuing down the path of what has happened in trunk. :)
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, the part you are objecting to is not a part of this ticket. > It was done a long time ago on trunk. This ticket is only about making > dependency management easier on the non-maven folks. If you'd rather see all > three (now sort of four) modules re-combined, I think it'd be better to > start a separate discussion. > > Jeremy Thomerson > http://wickettraining.com > -- sent from my "smart" phone, so please excuse spelling, formatting, or > compiler errors > > On Dec 22, 2010 7:34 AM, "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > > -1, sounds very confusing to me. I was just looking for something > last night in the source. It was something that I assumed would be in > the "core" of the framework, but I had to look in wicket-util for it. > I don't like that. If it's required to run Wicket, then it should be > part of the "core." > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> With http... >
