[GitHub] wicket pull request #197: WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate...

GitHub user duesenklipper opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/197 WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onclick attribu… …te for img tags You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] wicket pull request #199: WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate...

GitHub user duesenklipper opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/199 WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onclick attribu… …te for img tags You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] wicket pull request #198: WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate...

GitHub user duesenklipper opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/198 WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onclick attribu… …te for img tags You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] wicket pull request #196: WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate...

GitHub user duesenklipper opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/196 WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onclick attribu… …te for img tags You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] wicket issue #194: WICKET-6287 Switch from json.org to open-json - 6.x

Github user klopfdreh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/194 fyi @martin-g --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

[GitHub] wicket issue #195: WICKET-6287 Switch from json.org to open-json - 7.x

Github user klopfdreh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/195 fyi @martin-g --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

Re: Behavior#onTag() doesn't have the Component

Hi, the behavior is added to a single component only and readily available anyway in scope: component.add(onTag(tag -> tag.put(key, component.getId())); What do we gain when the same component is given as argument? component.add(onTag(component, tag -> tag.put(key,

Behavior#onTag() doesn't have the Component

Hi, At Martijn's slides from ApacheCon [1] I've noticed that critiques he mention is that org.apache.wicket.behavior.Behavior#onTag() uses SerializableConsumer and ignores the Component parameter. I agree that having the component would be handy! Any good reasons why it should be like this ? 1.

[GitHub] wicket issue #196: WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onc...

Github user martin-g commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/196 Looks good! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] wicket pull request #195: WICKET-6287 Switch from json.org to open-json - 7....

GitHub user klopfdreh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/195 WICKET-6287 Switch from json.org to open-json - 7.x There are clirr errors, because of some classes missing in open-json You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $

[GitHub] wicket issue #199: WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onc...

Github user martin-g commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/199 Is it really needed for 1.5.x ? This branch is for security fixes only. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

Re: One more Apache project uses Wicket - AsterixDb

Very good! I will add it to the list this weekend. Andrea. On 24/11/2016 21:51, Martin Grigorov wrote: https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/search?l=Maven+POM=wicket=%E2%9C%93 we should add it to http://wicket.apache.org/apache/! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting

using lambdas fro Args?

Hi, Does it make sense to use lambdas for things like https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-util/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/util/lang/Args.java#L37 ? -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Re: using lambdas fro Args?

How the new usage would look like ? Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Does it make sense to use lambdas for things like > >

Re: using lambdas fro Args?

What would be the benefit ? The logging libraries provide such API but there one want to avoid calculating the log message unless really needed. In our case the "name" is not something expensive to calculate. It is a static string (always?!). What would bring value is using the Java 8 goodies to

Re: using lambdas fro Args?

*public class *Args { *public static * T notNull(T argument, Supplier name) { *if*(argument == *null*) { *throw new *IllegalArgumentException(name.get() + *" may not be null"*); } *else *{ *return *argument; } } *public void *test() {