Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.17.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 18.03.2024 um 12:01 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > tested: > - signatures > - build from sources > - wicketstuff build > - some exmaples > > BTW I guess the repository URL in the ANN email is wrong, > Repository: g...@github.com:bitstorm/wicket.git -> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 10.0.0 - TAKE 2

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 11.03.2024 um 17:17 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 to release > > Migrated tutorial examples to wicket 10 and tested. > >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 1:19 PM Martin Grigorov >> wrote: >> >> +1 to release ! >> >> Tested: >> - local build from the .tar.gz file >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.16.0 (take 2)

+1 - thanks for updating the dependencies - good hint Maxim :) > Am 24.11.2023 um 20:51 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro : > > +1 our application seems to work as expected with wicket 9.16.0. Thanks for > taking care of our releases! > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 9:55 AM Andrea Del Bene >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 10.0.0-M1

+1 > Am 13.06.2023 um 09:39 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > +1 to release > > Checked: > - build from source > - tested various examples on Tomcat 11 alpha with JDK 22 EA b1 > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 3:35 PM Andrea Del Bene > wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 10.0.0-M1 >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.14.0 - take 2

+1 (again :-) ) > Am 25.05.2023 um 05:47 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > Tested: > - signatures > - build from sources > - wicketstuff build > - some wicketstuff examples > > On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 21:08, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> >> always a pleasure  >> >> >> On Wed, May 24, 2023

Re: Apache Committers

Hey again, I joined the infra team slack channel and got the answer. You need to: 1. Add 2fa to your GitHub account 2. Log in to https://gitbox.apache.org/boxer/ with your ASF id and follow the instructions That’s all. kind regards Tobias > Am 09.12.2022 um 23:10 schrieb Tobias Solosche

Re: Apache Committers

e 2016 or so, but they were unable to enforce it at that time. > Now they can validate and are cleaning up the committers group. > > Martijn > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 7:57 PM Tobias Soloschenko > wrote: > >> Hey everyone, >> >> I just received the same me

Re: Apache Committers

Hey everyone, I just received the same message. kind regards Tobias > Am 09.12.2022 um 19:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > That's weird, and honestly I don't know who might responsible for this . I > will try to investigate further. > >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 6:32 PM Michael Mosmann

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.12.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 12.10.2022 um 08:50 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > Tested: > - signarures > - build from sources > - wicketstuff build > - some wicketstuff examples > >> On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 00:06, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket

Re: Time for 9.12.0?

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 13.09.2022 um 22:19 schrieb Thomas Heigl : > > +1 > >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 1:14 PM Andrea Del Bene >> wrote: >> >> Looks like we have enough material to promote a new release. WDYT? >> >> -- >> Andrea Del Bene. >> Apache Wicket committer. >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.10.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 04.05.2022 um 06:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > tested: > - signatures > - local build > - wicketstuff build > - couple wicketstuff examples > >> On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 18:23, Thomas Heigl wrote: >> >> +1. >> >> I deployed this release to production

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.9.1

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 05.04.2022 um 12:42 schrieb Thomas Heigl : > > +1 > > Ran our CI build and repeated stress tests on our staging environment. > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 11:07 PM Andrea Del Bene >> wrote: >> >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.9.1 >> >> Please

Re: [DISSCUSSION] can we drop wicketstuff-pushd*

+1 to remove kind regards Tobias > Am 01.04.2022 um 20:12 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro : > > +1 to remove > >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:51 AM Martin Grigorov >> wrote: >> >> +1 to drop it! >> >> If someone uses it then (s)he can use the old releases and send a PR later >> to revive

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.9.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 27.03.2022 um 14:58 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.9.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote >

Re: Release Wicket 9.9.0?

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 26.03.2022 um 19:30 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 for me! > >> On 25/03/22 16:22, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: >> We are very interested too! Thanks for fixing/spotting this! I have some >> other web socket related developments in process but those can wait

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.14.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 02.02.2022 um 11:59 schrieb Sven Meier : > > +1 yes, release > > Checked build and checksums > > Thanks > Sven > > >> On 29.01.22 17:00, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.14.0 >> >> Please download the source distributions

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.7.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 30.11.2021 um 09:15 schrieb Sven Meier : > > +1 > > tested signature, build and some random examples. > > Many thanks > Sven > > >> On 30.11.21 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >> +1 >> >> tested: >> - signatures >> - build from sources >> - wicketstuff build >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.6.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 31.10.2021 um 14:46 schrieb Sven Meier : > > Hi, > > +1 release Apache Wicket 9.6.0 > > Reviewed checksum, build and a few examples. > > Many thanks > Sven > > >> On 29.10.21 22:24, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.6.0 >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.5.0

Oh I was to late :-) - anyway all +1 so everything is fine for me. kind regards Tobias > Am 12.09.2021 um 16:43 schrieb Tobias Soloschenko > : > > +1 > > kind regards > > Tobias > >> Am 12.09.2021 um 12:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : >> >> Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.5.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 12.09.2021 um 12:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This vote passes. Thank you all! > >> On 12/09/21 12:55, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> +1 to release. tested with my main app >> >>> On 07/09/21 14:10, Sven Meier wrote: >>> +1 to release >>> >>> Many thanks >>>

Re: [VOTE] Buildbot config - SVN or Git ?

+1 git - what a question. :-) > Am 17.08.2021 um 09:39 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro : > > +1 git > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:37 AM Sven Meier wrote: > >> +1 git >> >> Am 17. August 2021 09:26:54 MESZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene < >> an.delb...@gmail.com>: >>> +1 for Git >>> >>> On Tue,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.13.0

+1 > Am 07.07.2021 um 23:07 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.13.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > lasts for 72 hours

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.4.0

+1 :-) > Am 03.07.2021 um 19:43 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.4.0 > > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > lasts for 72 hours

Re: Wicket 10 ideas

Hi everyone, from my side I also would prefer removing component queuing (+1), enclosures I would prefer a rework and not to remove it (+0). In addition to Martin’s list I would add some points — Martin's list — 4) Move wicket-http2-servlet4 into core and remove wicket-http2-jetty /

Re: [DISCUSS] Make wicket-http2 a stable module

Good idea. My suggestion would be to move it into core directly, because it is standard servlet API as of version 4. Any other opinions? kind regards Tobias > Am 21.04.2021 um 10:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Hi, > > Shall we make wicket-http2 a stable module now in master branch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.11.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 20.11.2020 um 23:41 schrieb Sven Meier : > > +1 for release > > Tested signature and our main application. > > Thanks > Sven > > >> On 20.11.20 21:35, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.11.0 >> >> Please download the source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.2.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 16.11.2020 um 15:00 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > tested > - signatures, > - local build > - wicket stuff build, examples > - main app > > >> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 17:51, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro >> wrote: >> >> +1 for release: our selenium tests are

Re: new release 9.2.0 ?

+1 for release kind regards Tobias > Am 28.10.2020 um 23:27 schrieb Sven Meier : > > Hi all, > > wicket-9.x got some important fixes, so we should release a 9.2.0 soon. > > WDYT? > > Sven >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.10.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 04.10.2020 um 21:16 schrieb Sven Meier : > > +1 tested examples and zip signature > > Sven > > >> On 03.10.20 19:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.10.0 >> >> Please download the source distributions found in our staging

Re: JDK 15 is now in the Initial Release Candidate Phase

+1 :-D kind regards Tobias > Am 15.09.2020 um 16:11 schrieb Rory O'Donnell : > > You are too fast! > > Thanks Martin, emails going out with the GA details and latest JDK 16 EA > build info ! > > Rgds,Rory > >> On 15/09/2020 15:06, Martin Grigorov wrote: >> Hi Rory, >> >> I've noticed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.17.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 19.07.2020 um 19:09 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 > > randomly tested examples. > > >> On 18/07/20 23:18, Sven Meier wrote: >> +1 >> >> tested signature and some examples. >> >> Thanks >> Sven >> >>> On 18.07.20 20:04, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>> +1 >>>

Fwd: Minor bug at Wicket Homepage

Hey, as you could see I opened a PR to fix the issues on wicket-site. I sadly was not able to push directly to asf-site, so that the updates are online. kind regards Tobias > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: > > Von: Tobias Soloschenko > Betreff: Minor bug at Wicket Home

Minor bug at Wicket Homepage

Hi, I noticed a minor bug at the new Homepage on my iPhone X - the „Table of Contents“ and Getting Started is display right above the main logo. I try to fix this at weekend. Or do anyone know the right spot to fix this fast? kind regards Tobias

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.9.0

+1 > Am 15.07.2020 um 16:46 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 > > Tested user guide examples. > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:00 AM Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Tested: >> - signatures >> - build from sources >> - wicketstuff build >> - some wicketstuff examples >> >> On Mon, 13

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.0.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 09.07.2020 um 11:44 schrieb Thomas Heigl : > > Hi, > > [x] Yes, release Apache Wicket 9.0.0 > > I ran CI tests and manually tested my main application. > > Best regards, > > Thomas > >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:25 PM Andrea Del Bene >> wrote: >> >> This is

Re: Release Wicket 9.0.0?

Thanks Andrea! kind regards Tobias > Am 09.06.2020 um 12:40 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +0.8 We still have (few) work to do on the non technical stuff, mainly on > the 2 new release announces: the one for the press and the one for the > site. I will provide all details on private channel. >

Re: Contribution - CSP support for Wicket

Hi, to my opinion they just want to contribute to Wicket. I would simply explain how the process of contribution works at ASF (PRs, etc.) and give them some information what challenges we were faced with till now. kind regards Tobias > Am 05.06.2020 um 02:18 schrieb Andrew Kondratev : > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer - Thomas Heigl

Welcome Thomas! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 22.05.2020 um 21:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > The Apache Wicket team is happy to announce that Thomas Heigl has been voted > in as a committer on Apache Wicket and also as a PMC member of the project! > Thomas is an active member of the

Re: Time to release 9.0.0 ?

+1 - lets release kind regards Tobias > Am 30.04.2020 um 09:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > let's release final version :) > >> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Martin Grigorov wrote: >> >> Hi team, >> >> Few weeks have passed since Wicket 9.0.0-M5 and there are no stopper issues >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.8.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 22.04.2020 um 17:33 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 > > Tested user guide examples. > >> On 4/19/20 9:12 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.8.0 >> >> Please download the source distributions found in our staging area >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M5 TAKE 3

If it is fine for you and not a Bit Deal you can do it manually - if there are steps which are release blocking then we can revert and revote for a new one. If I can support in any way please let me know! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 05.04.2020 um 20:00 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > Sorry

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M5 TAKE 3

+1 :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 02.04.2020 um 11:43 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M5 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M5 TAKE 2

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 01.04.2020 um 06:27 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > tested > * signatures/hashes > * local build > * wicketstuff build (examples need to be reviewed and fixed, will do later) > * our main app > >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 11:03, Martin Grigorov wrote: >> >>

Re: WICKET-6725 styling of hidden elements: no vote yet

Oh dear - why devs don’t stop using !important - it is so hard to customize it by use more specific selectors... anyway - as long as the css are clear and simple to support functions of the backend they are ok. Users can even customize them. display: none to hide something is simple and clear

Re: Is it time for release?

:-) from me a +1 kind regards Tobias > Am 08.03.2020 um 08:23 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 6:56 AM Martin Grigorov wrote: > >> >> >>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 2:06 PM Andrea Del Bene >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> For the 9.0.0-M5 I guess, the other versions dont have

Re: WICKET-6725 styling of hidden elements: no vote yet

Hi, as you know I am a big fan of HTML5 and was experimenting a lot with it, I would also vote to stay with a core css and clean it up, because of a better backward compatibility. flex is used a LOT in modern layouts and would break the other option. kind regards Tobias > Am 26.02.2020 um

Re: buildbot failure in on wicket-master-java12

+1 to remove JDK 12 testing kind regards Tobias > Am 09.01.2020 um 09:52 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > I would vote for removing JDK12 > no need to test outdated non-LTS versions IMO > >> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 15:06, Martin Grigorov wrote: >> >> Hi team, >> >> The build for Java 12 has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.7.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 03.01.2020 um 20:39 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.7.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.16.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 04.01.2020 um 15:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.16.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M4 TAKE 2

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 05.01.2020 um 16:10 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M4 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote >

Re: UCT -> UTC, here we go again...

Thanks! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 25.11.2019 um 17:59 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > et voilà! > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19481 > >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:22 PM Tobias Soloschenko >> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> k

Re: UCT -> UTC, here we go again...

olks to upgrade the current JDK 11 > used by Buildbot. > >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:18 AM Tobias Soloschenko >> wrote: >> >> I think the tests are fine (to also test UTC) I would just have a look if >> it is also possible to check the jdk on builds and if not jus

Re: UCT -> UTC, here we go again...

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228473 >> >>> On 11/23/19 11:18 PM, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >>> Martin also asked if the fix is downported from JDK 13 to 12 / 11 and it >> is a bit more complicated >>> >>> kind regards >>> >

Re: UCT -> UTC, here we go again...

Martin also asked if the fix is downported from JDK 13 to 12 / 11 and it is a bit more complicated kind regards Tobias > Am 23.11.2019 um 22:35 schrieb Sven Meier : > > Hi Andrea, > > confirmed! > > Sven > >> On 23.11.19 18:57, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just found that

Re: New release cycle.

If nothing is left to be done - why not. :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 14.11.2019 um 10:07 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > WDYT? :-) > > -- > Andrea Del Bene. > Apache Wicket committer.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.6.1

+1 for fixes :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 09.09.2019 um 20:13 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.6.1 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.6.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 05.09.2019 um 09:37 schrieb Sven Meier : > > +1 > > built and tried some examples > > Many thanks Andrea! > > Sven > > Am 3. September 2019 23:20:13 MESZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene > : >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.6.0 >> >> Please download the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.15.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 05.09.2019 um 09:36 schrieb Sven Meier : > > +1 > > tested with our app > > Svenh > > Am 5. September 2019 07:48:21 MESZ schrieb Maxim Solodovnik > : >> +1 >> >> Tested: >> 1) signatures >> 2) build from sources >> 3) wicket-stuff build >> >> >> On Wed, 4 Sep

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M3

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 05.09.2019 um 09:44 schrieb Sven Meier : > > +1 > > Sven > > > Am 5. September 2019 09:12:39 MESZ schrieb Maxim Solodovnik > : >> +1 >> >> Tested: >> 1) signatures >> 2) build from sources >> 3) wicketstuff build >> 4) some examples >> >> >> On Thu, 5 Sep

Re: New Wicket Team Member: Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro!

Welcome to the Team! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 22.08.2019 um 11:02 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro : > > Thanks! > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:59 AM Martijn Dashorst < > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Woop woop!!! >> >> Welcome Ernesto! >> >> Martijn >> >> On Wed, Aug 21,

Re: Builds 6.x / 7.x / 8.x failing

ewer Java than 6.x because > BuildBot's JDK 6 doesn't like the new javadoc argument. > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:25 AM Tobias Soloschenko > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> currently there are some tests failing: >> >> https://ci.apache.org/builders >> >> kind regards >> >> Tobias

Builds 6.x / 7.x / 8.x failing

Hi everyone, currently there are some tests failing: https://ci.apache.org/builders kind regards Tobias

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M2

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 02.06.2019 um 19:11 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 to release. > > Tested with my main app > >> On 6/1/19 5:26 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> +1 to release >> >> Tested local build + various examples. >> >> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:51 AM Andrea Del

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.5.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 27.05.2019 um 15:22 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 to release > Tested user guide examples. > >> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 8:25 PM Sven Meier wrote: >> >> Thanks Ernesto! >> >> +1 too >> >> Sven >> >>> Am 26.05.19 um 08:18 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.14.0

+1 and sorry that I am not that active currently kind regards Tobias > Am 26.05.2019 um 14:59 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > +1 to release > > Tested local build + various examples > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:25 PM Andrea Del Bene > wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket

Re: Announcement for 9.0.0-M1

Hi, > Am 16.04.2019 um 10:40 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:23 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Apologies for chiming in... >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:10 AM Martin Grigorov >> wrote: >> >>> I think we should note that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M1

+1 (but I can’t test because of heavy work load) kind regards Tobias > Am 10.04.2019 um 22:00 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M1 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.13.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 03.04.2019 um 10:52 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > tested: > 1) signatures > 2) build from sources (java8 with -Pbuildot) > 3) wicketstuff build > 4) examples from wicketstuff > > >> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 03:00, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> >> This is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.4.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 02.04.2019 um 17:29 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > Tested: > 1) signatures - OK > 2) build from sources - OK > 3) test our main application - OK > >> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 02:44, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.4.0

Re: Releasing 9.0.0-M1 and the other minors

Just type in the version - without auto completion. It is created this way. :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 31.03.2019 um 21:29 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Hi Andrea, > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 5:54 PM Andrea Del Bene > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> with Wicket-6563 being solved, I think it might

Re: Testing Apache Wicket with JDK Early Access builds

>> We have to wait for a release of 1.2.5.Final. >> Both Java 12 and 13 builds of Wicket are green with this SNAPSHOT. >> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:17 AM Tobias Soloschenko >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Martin, >>> >>> now the build

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.12.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 05.02.2019 um 16:45 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Hi, > > Without > https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/bcf516a3928f7db8af87f046de12450bafe74a7f > I was not able to build locally (with any combination of JDK/Maven). > Hopefully it will be easier next time! > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.3.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 28.01.2019 um 06:05 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > Tested: > 1) signatures, hash > 2) build from sources > 3) Apache OpenMeetings > 4) wicketstuff, build, select2 examples > > >> On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 20:53, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> >> This is a vote

Re: Testing Apache Wicket with JDK Early Access builds

ilds/1/steps/compile/logs/stdio > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:53 AM Tobias Soloschenko > wrote: > >> Thanks a lot Martin! >> >> kind regards >> >> Tobias >> >>> Am 21.01.2019 um 08:47 schrieb Martin Grigorov : >>> >>> htt

Re: Testing Apache Wicket with JDK Early Access builds

d that wicket-master-java12 fails with the Weld issue and just >> assumed -java13 fails the same way. >> >> We should ask Infra to add Java 13 to the toolchains! >> >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 7:43 PM Tobias Soloschenko >> wrote: >> >>> H

Re: Future releases and random thoughts

Hi, I think we should wait for Wicket 7 and release 8 / 9m1 kind regards Tobias > Am 21.01.2019 um 03:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 to release 8.3 and 9.0-M1 > 7.s is usually aligned with 8.x, so they should be released one-by-one :) > > will try to be more active on the project :) >

Re: Testing Apache Wicket with JDK Early Access builds

Hi, sorry for catching up so late, but do we need to ask infra to add jdk 13 to also test the ea build? I just saw that it is missing in the toolchain XML file and I wonder if it is already available? https://ci.apache.org/builders/wicket-master-java13/builds/0/steps/compile/logs/stdio kind

Re: Testing Apache Wicket with JDK Early Access builds

Hello Martin, sounds good to me! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 17.01.2019 um 14:57 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Hi Tobias, > > This is what I meant with discussing at dev@. > All talks should be on dev@, not led by me. > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 15:43 Tobias Solos

Re: Testing Apache Wicket with JDK Early Access builds

Hey Martin, that would be great! +1 for participating! I‘ve a question regarding feedback and responsibilies - do you have to give them feedback or can we do this as well (because they only reached out to you) If it is only possible for you a question would be if this can be extended to the

Re: Tumblr carroussel works again...

Great! I am going to have a look at it, now. :-) Thanks for fixing! kind regards Tobias > Am 06.01.2019 um 23:14 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > > By hosting the json data on a non-cookie encumbered environment I was > able to re-enable the built-with-wicket carroussel. > > Also new background

Re: Time for 7.11.0 too?

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 22.11.2018 um 08:26 schrieb sven : > > > > +1 > > > > Sven > > > > > > > > > >> >> On 22.11.2018 at 08:23,wrote: >> >> >> +1 There are 4 resolved tickets for 6.29.0 too ( >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WICKET/versions/12341703)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.2.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 14.11.2018 um 11:54 schrieb Sven Meier : > > +1 ditto > > SvenAm 14.11.2018 09:50 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : >> >> +1 >> >> Tested my main app and random user guide examples >> >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:01 AM Maxim Solodovnik >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>>

Re: Redirect after Response has been written

Hello Mr. Schwarzer, please use u...@wicket.apache.org. kind regards Tobias > Am 14.11.2018 um 09:36 schrieb Patrick Schwarzer > : > > Dear Sir or Madam, > > we having a specific problem in using Wicket 7.10, creating an Ajax-Response > with multiple entries. > > In our application, we

Re: Remove deprecated classes in master

Base64 can easily be replaced with (Java 8) // Encode String asB64 = Base64.getEncoder().encodeToString("some string".getBytes("utf-8")); System.out.println(asB64); // Output will be: c29tZSBzdHJpbmc= // Decode byte[] asBytes = Base64.getDecoder().decode("c29tZSBzdHJpbmc=");

Re: Problem with Java 8 (8u181)

Thanks for sharing! kind regards Tobias > Am 10.11.2018 um 17:10 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > FYI: there's a nasty bug with the last Java 8 version and the Surefire > plugin. Here you can find more info and a workaround: > > https://stackoverflow.com/a/53016532/1676516 >

Re: Time for 8.2.0?

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 09.11.2018 um 03:50 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Big +1 > >> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 04:14, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> it seems we have stacked quite number of issues planned for the next >> release. Should I start the new release cycle in the next

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.1.0

+1 - :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 13.09.2018 um 13:38 schrieb Emond Papegaaij : > > Agreed, that's why I did not vote yet > > +1 to release. Checked the source for release errors and checked the hashes. > Also did a build locally and it was fine (except for jetty:run). > > Emond > >> On

Re: Tumbler down

Thanks for the information! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 10.07.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:49 AM Martijn Dashorst > wrote: >> I'm submitting a bug report. However, this might mean we need to move >> the carroussel generation to build-time (i.e. when

Re: [GitHub] wicket pull request #283: Wicket-6563 page store implementation

> Am 10.07.2018 um 09:54 schrieb Emond Papegaaij : > >> On maandag 9 juli 2018 21:21:42 CEST Sven Meier wrote: >> Hi Emond, >> >> many thanks for your first feedback. >> >>> this is an enormous amount of code to review so this will take some time >> >> Actually its mostly the old code

Re: Tumbler down

direct=https%3A%2F%2Fbuiltwithwicket.tumblr.com%2Fapi%2Fread%2Fjson%3Fcallback%3DjQuery111304038688794901899_1531204859945%26_%3D1531204859946 > with MIME type text/html. See > https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5629709824032768 for more details > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:24 AM Tobias Solosche

Re: Tumbler down

On the wicket site. I am sorry just forgot to mention this. kind regards Tobias > Am 10.07.2018 um 08:10 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > https://builtwithwicket.tumblr.com/ > > looks OK to me > > Or you mean another integration ? > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 7:57 AM

Tumbler down

Hey all, just noticed that the Tumbler integration doesn‘t show up any projects. kind regards Tobias

Re: [DISCUSSION] WICKET-6544 mobile browser detection

dden behind an age-old API Wicket API (UserAgent) ... >>> - ... which won't be sufficient to many people anyways >>> >>> .. just to save someone a single line of code passing the user agent >>> string to the library himself. >>> >>> Have fun >>

Re: [DISCUSSION] WICKET-6544 mobile browser detection

xim Solodovnik : > > Is it time to resume this discussion? > We still have PR unmerged, and don't have agreement what to do next :( > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:08 AM Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> :-D >> >> kind rega

Re: Drop lambda-parent from wicketstuff

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 21.06.2018 um 04:59 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Hello All, > > Shall we drop lambda-parent from wicket-8.x and master branch? > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax

Question regarding branches

Hey guys, maybe I missed something, but why do we have master and wicket-9.x? I thought the latest version is master and all others are wicket-x.x. kind regards Tobias

Re: New master branch

Thanks for all the work Andrea! kind regards Tobias > Am 22.05.2018 um 10:13 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > A quick recap of what I did yesterday: > > - Wicket 8 has been release but I have to send the official announce yet. > - I've created a new branch called wicket-8.x

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 16.05.2018 um 22:01 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source

Re: Editing announcement for wicket 8

Hi Martijn, I have just one question - maybe I got it wrong, but does Wicket 8 run also with Java 9 / 10? I thought there are some issues with those newer VMs - it was also discussed on the dev mailing list - if yes we should not mention Java 8+. Kindly let ne know if I am wrong. :-) kind

Re: Wicket 8 site

WOW - looks awesome! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 26.04.2018 um 17:45 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > > This is what I'm working on: > > https://slack-files.com/T4S1WH2J3-FADRRMU0J-40deceefd2 > > Martijn > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Andrea Del Bene

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >