Re: [Dev] [C5][BPS] Writing integration tests for Rest APIs

Thanks Hemika, I will have a look at this. Yes, we are using MSF4J. @Manuranga, I'm testing REST APIs from Activiti that we have integrated. I'm trying to test the resource authorizations for these APIs. I'm afraid unit tests aren't an option for this. Regards, Vinod On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at

[Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus 5.0.0 RC4

Hi All, This is the 4th Release Candidate of WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus 5.0.0 Please download, test the product and vote. Vote will be open for 72 hours or as needed. Source and distribution Run-time: https://github.com/wso2/product-esb/releases/tag/v5.0.0-rc4 Tooling :

Re: [Dev] [C5][BPS] Writing integration tests for Rest APIs

Are all the Java methods in the service class unit tested? What is the unit test code coverage? If so the integration will only be needed to test high level interactions. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Carbon Kernel 4.4.8 RC1

Hi All, Thank you for testing the kernel 4.4.8-rc1. This vote has passed with \4 +1s and 0 -1s. Therefore we will proceed with the Kernel 4.4.8 release. Thanks On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Nandika Jayawardana wrote: > Tested the basic functionalities. > > [x] Stable -

Re: [Dev] [C5][BPS] Writing integration tests for Rest APIs

Hi Vinod, Assuming that you are using MSF4J for the REST service implementation, you can use the "org.wso2.msf4j.MicroservicesRunner" class to start up a specific service. See [1] for a sample. Basically you create an instances of your REST service which implements " org.wso2.msf4j.Microservice"

Re: [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Carbon Kernel 4.4.8 RC1

Tested the basic functionalities. [x] Stable - Go ahead and release Regards Nandika On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Milinda Perera wrote: > Hi all, > > Smoke tested BPS 3.6.0 upgrading to kernel v4.4.8. Tested basic > functionalities of BPEL, BPMN and WS-Humantask and

Re: [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Carbon Kernel 4.4.8 RC1

Hi all, Smoke tested BPS 3.6.0 upgrading to kernel v4.4.8. Tested basic functionalities of BPEL, BPMN and WS-Humantask and works fine. [x] Stable - Go ahead and release Thanks, Milinda On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Viraj Senevirathne wrote: > Hi all, > > Tested ESB

[Dev] [DAS 310] ML Siddhi Extension doc update

Hi all, I can see in the doc[1] for the ML siddhi extension, we need to install the features (ML Siddhi extension ...etc). This was true for previous releases. But I can see these features are already installed in the latest DAS pack. If that's so, we need to update the docs accordingly. Can

Re: [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Carbon Kernel 4.4.8 RC1

Hi all, Tested ESB 5.0.0 along with analytics ESB with kernel 4.4.8 and also tested try it functionality. [+] Stable - Go ahead and release Thanks, On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Nadeeshaan Gunasinghe wrote: > Hi all, > > Built the ESB 5.0.0 with the latest, kernel

Re: [Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Carbon Kernel 4.4.8 RC1

Hi all, Built the ESB 5.0.0 with the latest, kernel 4.4.8 release and did a smoke test, could not find any issues. [+] Stable - Go ahead and release Thanks, *Nadeeshaan Gunasinghe* Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com +94770596754 | nadeesh...@wso2.com | Skype: nadeeshaan.gunasinghe

Re: [Dev] Writing an OSGI Component to Create a Tenant during ESB Startup

I think random wording here is misleading. AFAIU last mail you are using the tenant id of the user to do this right. So that's not random right? Thanks & Regards Danushka Fernando Senior Software Engineer WSO2 inc. http://wso2.com/ Mobile : +94716332729 On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Maheeka

[Dev] [VOTE] Release WSO2 Carbon Kernel 4.4.8 RC1

Hi Devs, This is the 1st release candidate of WSO2 Carbon Kernel 4.4.8. This release fixes the following issue *https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-16021 * Please download and test your products with kernel 4.4.8 RC1 and vote. Vote will be open for 72

Re: [Dev] Why some of the features aren't shown in the Available Feature UI

Hi Abimaran, As mentioned by Aruna and KasunG, this is based on the value defined in the feature pom under adviceFile. In the Feature Management UI when the "Group by" is unticked, features which have "org.eclipse.equinox.p2.type.group:false" within "adviceFile" in the pom.xml are not displayed.

Re: [Dev] UI/UX Improvement for Dashboard Server

Hi All, Jerad will help on this. Regards, *Dakshika Jayathilaka* PMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos Associate Technical Lead WSO2, Inc. lean.enterprise.middleware 0771100911 On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Nipuna Chandradasa wrote: > Hi All, > > There are few UI and

Re: [Dev] Why some of the features aren't shown in the Available Feature UI

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Abimaran Kugathasan wrote: > Hi Dev, > > When I tried to install features on latest Identity Server 5.2.0 SNAPHOT, > I could observe that, the features listed under a category are not shown in > the list of feature when I don't select either of

Re: [Dev] Why some of the features aren't shown in the Available Feature UI

This is derived through the "adviceFile" properties of your features. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Abimaran Kugathasan wrote: > Hi Dev, > > When I tried to install features on latest Identity Server 5.2.0 SNAPHOT, > I could observe that, the features listed under a

[Dev] Why some of the features aren't shown in the Available Feature UI

Hi Dev, When I tried to install features on latest Identity Server 5.2.0 SNAPHOT, I could observe that, the features listed under a category are not shown in the list of feature when I don't select either of below checkbox. Show only the latest versions Group features by category For

Re: [Dev] Writing an OSGI Component to Create a Tenant during ESB Startup

Hi Sanjiva, We tested to verify that any random TenantID can be given when calling the addTenant method of the TenantMgtAdminService. In the Integration Cloud, we are getting the TenantID and the TenantDomain of the logged in cloud user and setting those as environment variables in the docker

[Dev] [C5][BPS] Writing integration tests for Rest APIs

Hi, I'm working in $subject. In C4 we had utility methods to start a server instance and get server URLs. Then we used a HTTP client to test rest APIs. In C5 how do we achieve the same? Regards, Vinod -- Vinod Kavinda Software Engineer *WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware

Re: [Dev] [ESB 490] RelayUtils Error while building Passthrough stream in call mediator

Hi Nadeeshan, Yes, charset was null when I debug. ESB does not even sends the request I guess. It may be previous call did not respond with charset. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Nadeeshaan Gunasinghe wrote: > Hi Udara, > > According to the following snippet it seems

Re: [Dev] [ESB 490] RelayUtils Error while building Passthrough stream in call mediator

Hi Udara, According to the following snippet it seems like that the charsetEncoding hasn't been set to the message context. This could be either the response does not send the charset encoding or due to some configuration. extractParametersFromRequest(parameterMap, query,

Re: [Dev] Error while accessing dashboard from host name

Hi Megala/Hasintha, If this is for testing purpose, shall we try starting the server with -Dorg.wso2.ignoreHostnameVerification=true ? On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Megala Uthayakumar wrote: > Hi Hasintha, > > This error should be fixed if the certificate is correctly

Re: [Dev] IOTS Device Management Console: Cannot "Save and Publish" a Policy for Advanced Virtual Fire Alarm

Hi Yesin, Thanks for trying out IoTS. As per the offline discussion you are trying this on IoTS v.1.0.0 ALPHA release. This is a known issue as per https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IOTS-193. This will be fixed on the upcoming milestone release. Thanks, Rasika On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM,

Re: [Dev] [GSoC Final Evaluation] Proposal 21: [IS] Document Based NoSQL Support for WSO2 Identity Server Database

Hi Tharindu, According to your instructions i have added the components folder with the mongodbuserstore package to my forked repo[1] and i also sent the pull request to origin also[2] i have refactor the main package to *org.wso2.carbon.identity.user.store.mo

Re: [Dev] IOTS Device Management Console: Cannot "Save and Publish" a Policy for Advanced Virtual Fire Alarm

[+RasikaP] On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Yesin Singhawansa wrote: > Hi, > > During my hands on with IOTS I tried to create a policy for the virtual > fire alarm in the IOTS device manager console. Whilst saving the policy in > the last step (step 4): > > >- When clicking

[Dev] IOTS Device Management Console: Cannot "Save and Publish" a Policy for Advanced Virtual Fire Alarm

Hi, During my hands on with IOTS I tried to create a policy for the virtual fire alarm in the IOTS device manager console. Whilst saving the policy in the last step (step 4): - When clicking to "Save and Publish" nothing happens. - When clicking "Save" the page lands at

[Dev] [GSoC Final Evaluation] Proposal 21: [IS] Document Based NoSQL Support for WSO2 Identity Server Database

Hi Asantha, Now that you have completed the project [1], for the final evaluation, you need to contribute your code to WSO2 codebase. For that, we have created the repository [2]. You can refer [3] to get some idea about the package structure of the repo. Further, you can refactor your project

[Dev] Error while accessing dashboard from host name

Hi DS team. When I try to access IS analytics dashboard through a host name, while login to the dashboard I get the following exception. Tried to avoid this by installing a self signed certificate for the domain name as in [1]. But still the issue is there. Any idea how to avoid this ? [1]

[Dev] UI/UX Improvement for Dashboard Server

Hi All, There are few UI and UX improvement to be added to the Dashboard Server. There are few improvements already added to the Dashboard Server by Imesh for it's Alpha release. Now available and TODO set of improvements listed below. *Added Improvements are:* - Move views drop down into

Re: [Dev] [GSOC 16] Initial Project Progress

Hi Isuru, I have updated the readme file [1], please have a look. There I mentioned the things that should be kept in mind while configuring wso2 AS and did not go in to detail on hot to configure as it can be found in the wso2 documentation. Would that be okay? user do not need to change