Hi Folks,
We are closing the dev@wso2.org email list down.
Our active discussions will continue in corresponding GitHub repos and
issues (https://github.com/wso2). Also, you can reach out to us in the
following channels for any technical questions:
- StackOverflow
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:23 PM Tharindu Bandara wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Find the best approach to maintain the archetypes (in a single repo or
>> inside the feature repo).
>
>
I didn't understand what do we meant by feature repo here. Still it is
going to be single repo right?
When we created the
ther upgraded
>>>>> dependencies built with java 8) and run on java 10 as Shankar instructed.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Tharindu Wijewardane <
>>>>> tharin...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:57 AM Sagara Gunathunga wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <
> shan...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 6:05 PM Ruwan Abeykoon wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
&g
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 6:05 PM Ruwan Abeykoon wrote:
> Hi All,
> We consider votes given on this mail is still active for RC3, as the
> change on RC2 to RC3 is only a text file addition.
>
No, that is not correct. Every new vote should be voted and stayed active
at least for 72 hours before
Then, can you get APIM to build using JDK8, but run on JDK 10 please? We'll
see how to proceed after doing that.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:29 PM Tharindu Wijewardane
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As KasunG suggested I tried to get the carbon kernel (built with java 8)
> to run on java 10 first.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Harsha Kumara wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Mushthaq Rumy wrote:
>
>> @Harsha - Thanks for the input. I have one more doubt. Why would a high
>> frequency of API creation cause errors? Since APIM should be
Do we have any requirements to see all queries together? If so, defining in
a single place would be easy. However, I am not sure whether we have used
that requirement ever. We normally look at the query local to the method?
If so, I am +1 for Ruwan's proposal. Being local constant to the method
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Buddhima Wijeweera
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment ESB can publish tenant-wise. I tried it with a latest ESB
> and following are the steps need to follow:
> 1. Enable statistics for global level.
> 2. Add eventpublisher & eventstream files to
he proxy port of
>>>> the worker nodes from manager nodes.
>>>>
>>>> I think above parameters would fix our problem. I have created a jira
>>>> [1] for this.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-15659
>>>>
t;
> Thanks
> Geeth
>
>
> *G. K. S. Munasinghe*
> *Senior Software Engineer,*
> *WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com/> *
> *lean.enterprise.middleware.*
>
> email: ge...@wso2.com
> phone:(+94) 777911226
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Selvaratnam
I agree with Chamara. We have a way to configure public hostname (HostName,
MgtHostName in carbon.xml) and port (proxy port in
tomcat/catalina-server.xml). This is what used in generating service
endpoints, WSDL URLs etc. when a server is fronted with LB. I don't see any
necessary for EMM to have
Jaminda, Prabath,
Please allocate someone and deliver the document ASAP.
@Jaminda, please ack back after allocating a person.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since the Alpha is released, the QA people MUST setup the cluster now. Is
>
Normally, we should keep the compatibility with older versions.
Is there any specific reason why you need upto microsecond precision for
the timestamp?
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Ishara Karunarathna
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For example In mysql version 5.6.4 (released on
i Shankar,
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <
> shan...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Normally, we should keep the compatibility with older versions.
>>
>> Is there any specific reason why you need upto microsecond precision for
>> the t
Who merged this fix?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Chamara Philips wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Supun Malinga wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Sameera Jayasoma
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We are still getting the
rovided by the automation team to check if the port it open (this is to
> check if the port is open). Thanks Nuwan for the help.
>
> Regards,
> Nira
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <
> shan...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> O
Even waiting for 30 seconds might not work. Can we loop with a sleep and
see whether the process is not there and proceed? Port will be closed
immediately, but the process might still run AFAIK.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <
shan...@wso2.com> wrote:
Test case will be failed and we have to
> kill the server after test and it will be tough since the server is not
> starting properly. So better to wait for 2 min after we called restart and
> let the server to close the port.
>
> Thanks,
> Nuwanw
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015
e wait for 15 seconds and then check if the
> port is open (using the waitForPort provided by the automation framework).
> This is to check if the server has successfully started again.
>
> Regards,
> Nira
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <
Folks, intermittent issues are the serious problem. We can't just leave it
with intermittent issues. Please track and see what was the cause? database
locked by another process means, two servers are running at the same time?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Niranjan Karunanandham
gt; Regards,
> Nira
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <
> shan...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Folks, intermittent issues are the serious problem. We can't just leave
>> it with intermittent issues. Please track and see what was the cause?
>&
Folks, There are no ack/comment for this.
Can we put this in our roadmap?
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Prabath Siriwardena prab...@wso2.com
wrote:
AFAIK the $subject is not working today.
Can we please get that fixed...? This would lead us to many more
useful integration patterns...
Rubasinghe sume...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sumedha, Dinusha,
When do we have the alpha release with feature frozen?
Hi Shankar,
We did alpha on 23rd Dec 2014. (http://builder1.us1.wso2.org/~appm/ lists
out all public
Hi Sumedha, Dinusha,
When do we have the alpha release with feature frozen?
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Yasassri Ratnayake yasas...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi All,
This is to update the Latest progress on App Manager Release testing.
Currently there are following blockers and critical issues.
Hi Jaminda,
Please go ahead with releasing SS with Carbon 4.3.0. We can release a patch
release later if needed.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Jaminda Batuwangala jami...@wso2.com
wrote:
Thanks Kishanthan for the update. Will schedule SS release to be after
Carbon 4.3.1. So will
We discussed this sometime back and decided from Carbon 4.4.0, we will move
to Java 7 and 8. We can't move to Java 7 as a platform in 4.3.0, since
there are some dependencies, products had some issues.
@Sameera, please comment.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com
+1. APIM, IS are the only pending move. Anything else we missed? Sumedha,
Johann, do we have a timeline?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Folks,
Our plan was to move all the code to GitHub last year, but unfortunately
we haven't moved some of the code yet.
Are we still frozen?
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Dinusha Senanayaka dinu...@wso2.com
wrote:
Can we unfreeze the branch now ?
Regards,
Dinusha.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Vijayaratha Vijayasingam rat...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi all;
Platform is open for all commits.
Make sure the
We are not suppose to commit any auto generated classes. If we are
committing for any reason (why?), we have to put the license headers
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Rajeeva Uthayasangar raje...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi,
Do we need to include the license header to auto generated classes from an
Hi Thayalan,
Did you report this in JIRA? I couldn't see any issues reported
Also, did you try the alpha pack? Do they still have this issue?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Thayalan thaya...@wso2.com wrote:
Set-up the cluster using the build [1] below. There were no other patches
applied
testing
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
VP Engineering
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - lean . enterprise . middleware
Phone: +94 714897591
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Do we have the report?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera krishan...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi Ratha,
Can you share the integration test result report as well.
Thanks,
Krishantha.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Vijayaratha Vijayasingam rat...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi all;
What are the test cases we are automating? Can you point to the test case
document?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Dimuthu De Lanerolle dimut...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have started the $subject and will update the progress soon.
Regards
--
Dimuthu De Lanerolle
Software Engineer
WSO2
What does this mean? We are embedding ApacheDS?
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014, Dimuthu De Lanerolle dimut...@wso2.com
wrote:
We are going to implement the $Subject. Will update the progress later.
Regards
--
Dimuthu De Lanerolle
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.
lean . enterprise .
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Sameera Jayasoma same...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Azeez,
+1 for this model. This will solve most of the issues that we are facing
in the current system.
Senaka, see my comment below.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Sajith Ravindra saji...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
When developing a web services using Axiom what should be the
messageReceiver we should use for an operations which only returns a value
but does not take an argument?
Can you give an example? OutOnly
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Nuwan,
Looping carbon-dev
G-Reg team will be starting to work on $subject. Team members who are
not allocated to support and are not working on C5 registry re-factoring
will start work on this. As discussed
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar shan...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
Yes that's what we do right now. But, wouldn't this complicate parallel
development work, especially if two or more
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara era...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Nuwan,
Looping carbon-dev
G-Reg team will be starting to work on $subject. Team members who
Hi Ravi,
This issue seemed to be different. Anyway, according to basic profile[1],
you can't have multiple root elements inside soap body. So, correct soap
body should be
soapenv:Header/
soapenv:Body
root
a1aaa/a1
b1bbb/b1
/root
/soapenv:Body
/soapenv:Envelope
[1]
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Susinda Perera susi...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi DevStudio Team mates
As we all know that we encountered number of bugs in devs in recent past(and
some bad comments). I hope we could surely reduce many
number of these bugs/complains if we have a proper test
Folks, please fix this ASAP.
org.wso2.carbon:carbon-products:pom:4.2.0 comes from platform branch (
https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/carbon/platform/branches/turing/products/pom.xml)
and it is wrong to refer it from kernel pom. Please fix as specified by
Danushka.
Regards,
Shankar
On Thu, Oct
I think, when we change StratosPublicCloudSetup parameter in stratos.xml
to false, it will not mandate the dot. You can give tenant names as
EngDept, etc. However, we have to test and see.
StratosPublicCloudSetupfalse/StratosPublicCloudSetup
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Afkham Azeez
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
I think, when we change StratosPublicCloudSetup parameter in
stratos.xml to false, it will not mandate the dot. You can
This was a known bug in Carbon 3.0.* products and later fixed. They way to
remove a patch in those products is to put a new patch with old jar.
Shankar
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
I applied a patch to WSO2 ESB 3.0.1 which was released with
First of all, this thread should be in architecture@
I think this is a very big usability issue. Can't we put tenant's name as
part of the URL? For example, if tenantA registers a cartridege with alias
Wordpress, can we make the URL as Wordpress.tenantA.php.stratoslive.com?
On Wednesday, January
Hi,
Check the following API (in 3.2.2 branch.. haven't checked in 4.0.0 branch)
SecretResolver org.wso2.securevault.SecretResolverFactory.create(OMElement
configuration, boolean isCapLetter)
why do we need the parameter isCapLetter? If it is true, it is searching
for an element SecureVault and
Good job people. This MileStone release is having lots of good feature and
very stable.
Regards,
Shankar
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Ajanthan Balachandran ajant...@wso2.comwrote:
*WSO2 App Factory v1.0.0 M6 Released*
8th October, 2012
The WSO2 App Factory team is pleased to announce
Can you guys start with Google Documents API?
Regards,
Shankar
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Pulasthi Supun pulas...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi
Need some clarification regarding the Cloud Connectors that were assigned
to the UOM December Batch as in [1] . GoogleApps is listed as a single
On Friday, September 7, 2012, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
Hi all,
We have developed a CLI Tool for managing artifacts and instances for
Cartridges.
(Stratos tenants are the users of this CLI Tool)
So before any operation, client will be authenticated against ADS
(Artifact Deployment Server).
I didn't understand your requirements fully. Why do you need the tenant Id?
Normally, you logged in using correct tenant username, and internally it
will handle it. We do not need to handle this at the dev studio level. Can
you explain what kind of operations you are trying to do?
Shankar
On
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
I didn't understand your requirements fully. Why do you need the tenant
Id? Normally, you logged in using correct tenant
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Sep 5, 2012 8:44 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar shan...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:41 AM
Comitted. Sorry for the delay.
Shankar
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Pradeep Fernando prad...@wso2.com wrote:
commit this to branch
--Pradeep
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Senior Software Architect
Chair, Management Committee – Cloud Technologies
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - lean .
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Lasindu Vidana Pathiranage
lasi...@wso2.com wrote:
I tried testing my code inside CarbonStuckThreadDetectionValve in
org.wso2.carbon.tomcat.ext in carbon core inside invoke() method. What
I did was when a thread passes through the valve to inside (Request) I
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda sanje...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi All,
There was a requirement of detecting Load Balancer state(running or not)
for handle fail over situations.
For this i have added proxy service(which returns server state) and bound
it to nhttp transport with
On Sunday, June 10, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
Having said that, have we,
1. Cleaned up the unused wrapper logic.
2. Fixed docs etc on how to use the new approach?
You don't need to fix the docs about startup. Still it is going to be
wso2server.sh --start and internally it is going to
On Friday, June 8, 2012, Senaka Fernando wrote:
Hi all,
Dimuthu, I believe that Azeez and I share the same view here. tenantDomain
== null means, either we didn't find the tenant or the tenant information
was never recorded due to some initialization error. And, the super tenant
would
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Thilina Buddhika thili...@wso2.com wrote:
Component versions and Carbon version are independent from each other.
Component version can be upgraded as they are getting matured starting from
a lower value.
I guess the version should be 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT. Agree
On Saturday, June 2, 2012, Afkham Azeez wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Kathiravelu Pradeeban
pradee...@wso2.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'pradee...@wso2.com');
wrote:
So based on the previous thread and this one, I will remove this feature
as well as captcha-mgt feature from all
sequence, why we do
need to care about loadbalancer.conf?
The same reason why we went through to make configuring autoscaling,
domains etc. using the loadbalancer.conf file.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Selvaratnam
Eventually, we have to integrate with securevault. But, we have plain text
password in all the places right? For example, if we have entitlement
mediator, admin username, password is in plain text.
As an improvement, we can include getting password from callback class.
Shankar.
On Thu, May 24,
One more thing we discussed was, ESB checks the dependency at the
deployment time. For example, if a proxy service depends on a sequence, it
validates whether the sequence exist when trying to deploy proxy service.
(e.g proxy service in one car file and sequence in another car file.. now
we have
$subject. It tries to create a symlink with ln. This is not valid in
windows. Please fix this.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (default) on
project hive-deploy: An Ant BuildException has occured: The following
error occurred while executing th
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
$subject. It tries to create a symlink with ln. This is not valid in
windows. Please fix this.
Note that ant symlink task can work only in unix based platforms[1].
[1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Charith Wickramarachchi
char...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Senaka ,
Last night I commented out this test case and triggered a build starting
from Kernel. Please find the Blocker created for this in [1]
[1]https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-718
Charith,
This issue
Hi Vijitha,
All these issues should be created in CARBON jira. Product specific
jiras are only for roadmap items and new features.
Shankar
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Vijitha Kumara viji...@wso2.com wrote:
Following JIRAs created to tackle these GReg issues:
1.
Hi Senaka,
Were you be able to build this in Windows? Is this error comes only to me?
Shankar
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
$subject due to emma. I am looking into this.
---
T E S T S
$subject due to emma. I am looking into this.
---
T E S T S
---
Running TestSuite
[2012-04-01 21:18:19,201] INFO
{org.wso2.carbon.integration.framework.utils.TestUtil} - Copying
$subject.
---
Test set: org.wso2.carbon.core.test.persistence.PersistenceManagerTest
---
Tests run: 14, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0,
I was building carbon kernel at this time.
Anyway, this issue was due to some bug in cache.core. Dimuthu said she
has already fixed it.
Regards,
Shankar
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Folks,
I cannot continue integration tests because of this issue. My
successful eight times in a row! [1] Does your setup is different?
[1] http://builder4.us1.wso2.org:/bamboo/browse/WSO2CARBON-CARBONCOREKERNELBUILD
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
$subject
This is committed to Apache axis2 trunk.
Shankar
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Please commit this to Apache trunk as well.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:02 PM, shan...@wso2.com wrote:
Author: shankar
Date: Mon Mar 26 03:32:26 2012
New Revision: 123874
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Azeez,
I had a look. Merging the some Services and Products is going to be
challenging. For example, let's take Governance. The service has several
things that is not required in the product. To start with there are
I created an L1, so that we will not miss.
https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-12677
Shankar
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Folks,
Please make sure that the patched Tomcat jar is shipped with the kernel.
Otherwise, webapp request throttling will not work
Buddhika thili...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
I will take a look. I am not sure the exact reason for placing an svn
extern to an external code repository. We should be able to depend on a
released version.
Thanks,
Thilina
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan
Hi Sajith,
Can you create an issue in stratos-jira [1] and attach the patch there?
Regards,
Shankar
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/STRATOS
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Sajith Kariyawasam saj...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Damitha,
Please ignore my previous patch file. Refer to the patch
from the build, we wont need it for
carbon 4.0.0
regards,
/Nuwan
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Nuwan,
Any reason for this?
Also, shindig is an extern to
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/ . Can't we depend
Hi,
$subject due to some bind issue. It is an intermittent issue. I guess
it closes a socket and uses again immediately (it will take some time
in windows, so we might need a sleep; I haven't debug to find the real
issue yet).
But the problem is, OAuth is an extern to
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Kasun Indrasiri ka...@wso2.com wrote:
ESB is badly broken and almost all the issues are related to kernel changes.
Hi Kasun,
Can you create L1 jira for all these kernel level problems? Please
select the component as carbon-core. We'll look into this ASAP.
(Adding dev@, removing carbon-dev@)
Had an offline chat with Samisa. I also agree with Pradeep's comments.
It is too late to upgrade the version for all the 3rd party. If there
is an absolute need for one or two 3rd party jars, we can do. For all
others we should do it after 4.0.0 release.
So,
in the registry kernel if required.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Most probably the infinispan update broke this.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
Yes, I am also getting test failures. I am
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
(Adding dev@, removing carbon-dev@)
Had an offline chat with Samisa. I also agree with Pradeep's comments.
It is too late to upgrade the version for all the 3rd party. If there
is an absolute need for one
. We have given 5 minutes as the
timeout in the test case. Do you think restart or carbon kernel might take
more than 5 minutes?
Regards,
Shankar
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
I increased the waitforport timout to 5 minutes, but still
, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Perhaps restart is broken?
It works fine in my machine (Windows). AmilaJ is now doing a full build
on Linux to see whether restart broken
$subject
Tests in error:
testStuff(org.wso2.carbon.user.core.authman.AdvancedPermissionTreeTest):
nullType class java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
testStuff(org.wso2.carbon.user.core.jdbc.AdvancedJDBCRealmTest):
nullType class java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
Sure Fire reports attached.
Fazlan, it seems these errors are due to recent changes. Can you have a look?
Shankar
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
$subject
Tests in error:
testStuff(org.wso2
$subject
E:\src\java\carbon_trunk\kernel\dependencies\axis2\1.6.1-wso2v5
E:\src\java\carbon_trunk\kernel\dependencies\axis2\1.6.1-wso2v5
Working copy 'E:\src\java\carbon_trunk\kernel\dependencies\axis2\1.6.1-wso2v5'
locked
Please execute the 'Cleanup' command.
I can see that axis2 1.6.1-wso2v5
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
During a discussion last week, the idea of merging the two into a single
binary came up. That is, instead of Carbon AppServer Stratos AppServer, we
will have a single AppServer binary which contains the relevant components
$subject. Please have a look
Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.227
sec FAILURE!
testNewModuleAddition(org.wso2.carbon.core.test.persistence.PersistenceManagerTest)
Time elapsed: 0.031 sec ERROR!^M
, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
$subject. Please have a look
Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.227
sec FAILURE!
testNewModuleAddition(org.wso2.carbon.core.test.persistence.PersistenceManagerTest)
Time elapsed: 0.031 sec ERROR!^M
org.wso2
.
WDYT?
PS: It is my understanding that the autoscaler component passes the
'domain name' to the Autoscaler Service, when it wants to scale.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Nirmal,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:18 AM
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Selvaratnam
Hi Nirmal,
Good progress!. we can do a review on the work already done.
Did you try the agent in windows? Is it using any native code?
See some comments below.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've started to implement 'new autoscaler
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Nirmal,
Good progress!. we can do a review on the work already done.
Thanks, will arrange a review this week
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Sameera Jayasoma same...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Thilini Ishaka thil...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to add some more information regarding this.
Unified endpoint per each file is okey to go with as far as we do not need
to edit
31, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Senaka,
Does that mean, configRegistry.resourceExists(serviceResourcePath)
takes from cache and resource =
configRegistry.get(serviceResourcePath); takes from database? That
doesn't sound right to me
Hi Senaka,
Does that mean, configRegistry.resourceExists(serviceResourcePath)
takes from cache and resource =
configRegistry.get(serviceResourcePath); takes from database? That
doesn't sound right to me. If this is the case, why we are caching
only the path, but not the resource?
If above two
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo