Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hi all, Thank you everyone for the guidance and support you gave through out the period. Special thanks goes to Isuru Udana for the continuous support provided. :) On Aug 24, 2016 11:27 AM, "Dinanjana Gunaratne" < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Kasun, > > Currently the OOM scenario

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hello Kasun, Currently the OOM scenario is mapped to "OOM" event in the ESB flight recorder. And CPU Spinning is mapped to "High CPU Usage" event in the tool. The requested resources for those events can be configured by the user of ESB Flight Recorder. Thanks, Dinanjana. On Tue, Aug 23, 2016

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Thanks, Dinanjana. I think it's good to have how different scenarios can be handled from ESB flight recorder information. - OOM - CPU spinning - Deadlock etc. Thanks, Kasun. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > Currently the

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Hi all, Currently the tool supports generating jfr along with thread dumps and heap dumps. And the report template has been changed so that it reflects a lot more details on environmental details during an event. All collectibles along with thread dumps and jfrs will be bundled in to a zip archive

[Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Dear all, This[1] is the blog post I made for final work product submission. Please have a look. :) [1]http://dinanjanagunaratne.blogspot.com/2016/08/during- past-3-months-i-was-engaged-in.html

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Increase of CPU usage >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Server goes to an unresponsive state >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

>>> to extract useful information to debug the issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before the server goes to >>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

enerate the heap dump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However heap dump is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

o we need to extract information like TPS of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the server, thread dumps >>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

;>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Nadeeshaan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gunasinghe <nadeesh...@wso2.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

o the source. In order to do so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you will need build the >>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

://wso2.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +94770596754 | nadeesh...@wso2.com | Skype: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nadeeshaan.gunasinghe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

56320_1348862296_-537557168_478758164_1912754997_-722133546_-1073985791_> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/nadeeshaan.gunasinghe> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>> <http://ws-promos.appspot.com/r?rdata=eyJydXJsIjogImh0dHA6Ly93d3cud2lzZXN0YW1wLmNvbS9lbWFpbC1pbnN0YWxsP3dzX25jaWQ9NjcyMjk0MDA4JnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9ZXh0ZW5zaW9uJnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXR

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>>>>>>> dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Isuru, >>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

m> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Isuru, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

Gunaratne" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

tion like this ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dashboard is a remote monitoring system which was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developed to monitor the status(server's aliveness and >>>>>>>>>>>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

;>>>>>>> and does not depend on any component which is being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monitored. With >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dashboard comes a Jav

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any component wish to register with Dashboard monitoring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system must >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement that Java librar

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

during my internship. I think we are looking at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an implementation within esb for debugging and monitoring. am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i correct ? >>>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great...! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> btw, don't call me "Sir" :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

t;>>>>>>>> ng down. Error starting SimpleAxisServer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: System can not find the given >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> axis2.xml E:\Project\wso2esb-4.9

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

;>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.axis2.deployment.FileSystemConfigurator.getAxisConfiguration(FileSystemConfigu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rator.java:118) >>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

onfigurationContextFactory.createConfigurationContextFromFileSy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stem(ConfigurationContextFactory.java:210) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sample

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>>>>>>>>> samples.util.SampleAxis2Server.startServer(SampleAxis2Server.java:61) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native >>>>>>>>>>>>> Method) >>>>>>>>>>&

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

MethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) >>>>>>>>>>>> at samples.util.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:132) >>>>>>>>>>>> &g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

/stackoverflow.com/questions/32866263/axis2server-packed-with-esb-4-9-0-doesnt-start-while-it-works-fine-4-8-0 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < >>>>>>>>>>> dinanjanagunar

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

(to execute a class) >>>>>>>>>>>or java [-options] -jar jarfile [args...] >>>>>>>>>>>(to execute a jar file) >>>>>>>>>>> where options include: >>>>>>>>

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

t;>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -cp >>>>>>>>>> -classpath >>>>>>>>> files> >>>>>>>>>> A ; separated list of directories, JAR archives, >>>&g

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

> require the specified version to run >>>>>>>> -showversion print product version and continue >>>>>>>> -jre-restrict-search | -no-jre-restrict-search >>>>>>>> include/exclude user private

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

-enableassertions[:...|:] >>>>>>> enable assertions with specified granularity >>>>>>> -da[:...|:] >>>>>>> -disableassertions[:...|:] >>>>>>> disable assertions

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

gt;>> enable system assertions >>>>>> -dsa | -disablesystemassertions >>>>>> disable system assertions >>>>>> -agentlib:[=] >>>>>> load native agent library

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

a | -disablesystemassertions >>>>> disable system assertions >>>>> -agentlib:[=] >>>>> load native agent library , e.g. >>>>> -agentlib:hprof >>>>> see also

Re: [Dev] GSOC 2016: Proposal 7

/ESB490/Samples Thanks. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Dinanjana Gunaratne < dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Dinanjana Gunaratne <dinanjanagunara...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:27 PM > Subject: [Dev]GSOC 2016: Proposal 7 > > > Dear