Hi VIndula,
Impressive progress so far..!!
As discussed let's have more focus on the the maximizing re-usability
aspects of this test suite. So the test suit will be easy to tryout, easy
to contribute & easy to integrate with test automation frameworks..
Regards,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:55
Hi,
As I demonstrated at the demo held today, I have been able to complete a
milestone of the project as per the timeline. As decided at the meeting, I
sent a PR[1] to the scim2-compliance-test-suite repo. Please review and
merge.
As I explained at the meeting, the current implementation[1]
Hi VIndula,
You can use https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance-test-suite
for your development. Please send a PR with the current code.
Regards,
Omindu.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera
wrote:
> Scheduled the meeting on 28th Wednesday at 3.00
Hi,
Yes I can do a demo on the current implementation. How about the June 28th
Wednesday at 3.00 pm ?
Please find the following details to test the /ServiceProviderConfig
endpoint.
1. Start the IS instance locally.
2. Deploy the scimproxycompliance.war
3. On the UI, select Compliance Test 2.0
Scheduled the meeting on 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm. Hope you've got the
request.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes I can do a demo on the current implementation. How about the June
> 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm ?
>
> Please find
Hi Vindula,
Would it possible for you to arrange the demo within the evaluation time
period (26th - 30th)? Also please share the instructions to try out the '
ServiceProviderConfig' test.
Thanks,
Omindu.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>
Hi Vindula,
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kindly find the weekly update below.
>
> Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component
> proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to
>
Hi,
Kindly find the weekly update below.
Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component
proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to
implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the scimcore
component, as we discussed in the previous
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test
> suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following
> possibilities.
>
+1
>
> 1. Apart from the specification
Hi,
I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test
suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following
possibilities.
1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a
significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code base.
Hi Omindu,
Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I incorporated the
suggestions you made on the proposal.
As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration options more
flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility to the tester as an
optional feature apart
Will have a look Vindula.
Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention behind
it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test suite and
the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough to
understand the nature of the tests and basics
Hi,
I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your
feedback in improving the proposal.
Thank you,
*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com
Hi,
As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite [1]. Due
to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet facing SCIM
1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity Server instance
in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due to
Hi,
Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the points you
have mentioned and will keep you updated here.
Thank you.
*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com
Hi Vindula,
If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated output,
that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host an IS
instance publicly to run the tests on it.
Regards,
Omindu.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
> Hi
Hi Vindula,
Thanks for your interest in this project.
Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could you
please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM 2.0
compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea from
SCIM 1.1 compliance test.
17 matches
Mail list logo