Re: [Dev] pattern for one to many match or multi match events ?

cool, Thank you ! On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Grainier Perera wrote: > Hi Jay, > > In that case, you can either remove events from the table which are older > than 24hrs, or you can include a condition to the join query to ignore > events that are older than 24hrs.

Re: [Dev] API Manager Expose WSDL

Hi Júnior, This is possible. Did create a SOAP API by providing a WSDL URL from Publisher? If that so, the WSDL will be available in Store to download in the particular API's overview section. Thanks! On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Júnior wrote: > Hi, > > We have a SOAP

[Dev] API Manager Expose WSDL

Hi, We have a SOAP Service exposed through API Manager to external world. We need to expose its wsdl as well. But as far as I could see that is not possible. Is there any option on API Manager that could make this possible? Thanks, -- Francisco Ribeiro *SCEA|SCJP|SCWCD|IBM Certified SOA

Re: [Dev] What is the correct behavior when user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration

There is no hard rule to specify which one should be the correct approach in this case. Since there is always room to override this setting using specific SP's configuration, I think current approach is ok. Thanks, On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote: > >

Re: [Dev] What is the correct behavior when user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Darshana Gunawardana wrote: > Since we returning the correct username in the response, its should be ok. > This is a configuration issue if the client is expecting otherway. > I think it is better if there is a way to inform client application

Re: [Dev] What is the correct behavior when user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration

Since we returning the correct username in the response, its should be ok. This is a configuration issue if the client is expecting otherway. Thanks, On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Darshana Gunawardana

Re: [Dev] What is the correct behavior when user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Darshana Gunawardana wrote: > Ok, now you asked the real question :) > > Yes I agree with the expected results you mentioned for all three cases. I > have checked this behaviour on a latest pack[1][2] and it only provision > user to specified

Re: [Dev] What is the correct behavior when user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration

Ok, now you asked the real question :) Yes I agree with the expected results you mentioned for all three cases. I have checked this behaviour on a latest pack[1][2] and it only provision user to specified userstore in the SP configuration in the case 3 which is a reasonable behariour. (I'm using

Re: [Dev] What is the correct behavior when user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Darshana Gunawardana wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote: > >> >> ​ >> When user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration should >> we allow to provision other user stores as

Re: [Dev] [Kubernetes Artifacts] Applying secure vault for wso2 products when building docker images

WSO2 Puppet scripts no longer support running Secure Vault while applying the scripts themselves. So this scenario is simplified even further. In your case, I think it would be just a matter of copying the necessary files. After running the Cipher Tool you get the following files. 1.

Re: [Dev] What is the correct behavior when user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote: > > ​ > When user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration should we > allow to provision other user stores as well ? > No. > For an example if we selected "TEST" as user store from Inbound > Provisioning

[Dev] What is the correct behavior when user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration

​ When user store selected from Inbound Provisioning Configuration should we allow to provision other user stores as well ? For an example if we selected "TEST" as user store from Inbound Provisioning Configuration, can we provision to PRIMARY user store as well ? Thanks, Gayan -- Gayan

Re: [Dev] Dynamic routing key on rabbitmq endpoint

Hi Norberto, You can find a sample configuration which uses Endpoint Template for a similar issue at[1]. [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38465378/wso2-value-dynamically-injected-to-the-endpoint Thanks, Manorama On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Sudharma Subasinghe

Re: [Dev] Dynamic routing key on rabbitmq endpoint

Hi Norberto, You can try endpoint template[1] to define parameter values, and then refer those values in uri using '$' sign. [1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB500/Endpoint+Template Thanks Sudharma On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Vinod Kavinda wrote: > Hi, > Can you try

Re: [Dev] Dynamic routing key on rabbitmq endpoint

Hi, Can you try using "get-property('sendToThisQueue')" other than using the context. Found this blog post[1] by a wso2 developer that may useful. [1] - http://wso2tech.blogspot.com/2015/06/wso2-esb-dynamic-jms-endpoint.html Regards, Vinod On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Norberto Fernandes

[Dev] Dynamic routing key on rabbitmq endpoint

Hi Developers, Could you please let me know if it is possible to pass a variable into a rabbitmq endpoint? I would like to set the routing key dynamically. So I was trying to use a property from the context and define the routing key based on that property. But I could not make it work. I

Re: [Dev] [C5} Inconsistent locations for runtime 'conf' directory and runtime 'deployment' directory

Hi Sajith, So, the conf directory for each runtime should be > /conf// and there shouldn't be a 'conf' directory > inside the runtime directory, right? Yes that is correct Another question: Where should the resources (e.g. security certificates, > databases, DB scripts) should go? Do they goes

[Dev] Download wsld and end points information is missing in cluster

Hi, I'm following https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM210/Configuring+an+Active-Active+Deployment to configure a cluster for API manager. Everything seems work except I don't have the endpoints showing in my API screen. In single node (all correct): [image: Inline image 2] In cluster (no end

Re: [Dev] pattern for one to many match or multi match events ?

Hi Jay, In that case, you can either remove events from the table which are older than 24hrs, or you can include a condition to the join query to ignore events that are older than 24hrs. Please refer to the sample below; @Plan:name('TestExecutionPlan') > define stream publisher (pid string,

[Dev] WSO2 Kubernetes-APIM 2.1.0-1 Released!

Hi, The WSO2 API Manager team is pleased to announce the release of Kubernetes/Openshift Resources for WSO2 API Manager (APIM) 2.1.0. The initial release contains resources for deploying WSO2 API Manager 2.1.0 deployment patterns on Kubernetes/Openshift environments. *Features:* - Deployment

Re: [Dev] [C5} Inconsistent locations for runtime 'conf' directory and runtime 'deployment' directory

Hi Thusitha, Sorry that I missed that part in the architecture discussion. So, the conf directory for each runtime should be /conf// and there shouldn't be a 'conf' directory inside the runtime directory, right? Another question: Where should the resources (e.g. security certificates, databases,