[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17811567#comment-17811567 ] Cédric Damioli commented on XALANJ-2617: [~kesh...@alum.mit.edu] I think you may also mark this

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17493637#comment-17493637 ] Joe Kesselman commented on XALANJ-2617: --- Sanity check: What version number does that Xalan

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17493626#comment-17493626 ] Takayuki Nagai commented on XALANJ-2617: I had the same problem and found a solution. I stopped

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17337488#comment-17337488 ] Patrick Ferreira commented on XALANJ-2617: -- As there are no updates since a few years, how do

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16804568#comment-16804568 ] Mukul Gandhi commented on XALANJ-2617: -- I can see that, somewhere in this jira thread its

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16774686#comment-16774686 ] Jason Harrop commented on XALANJ-2617: -- Compare https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2419 

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16615312#comment-16615312 ] Peter De Maeyer commented on XALANJ-2617: - Pull request created. Unfortunately, it only contains

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16615284#comment-16615284 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on XALANJ-2617: GitHub user peterdemaeyer opened a pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16612703#comment-16612703 ] Daniel Kec commented on XALANJ-2617: Great thx, i have been afraid it might break something without

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16612680#comment-16612680 ] Peter De Maeyer commented on XALANJ-2617: - It can be proven with a unit test that Daniel's fix

[jira] [Commented] (XALANJ-2617) Serializer produces separately escaped surrogate pair instead of codepoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16597890#comment-16597890 ] Peter De Maeyer commented on XALANJ-2617: - [~danielkec], I reviewed your patch, but I wonder if