Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2538
Thanks for the contribution @wishwisdom.
It's unclear in the screenshots because you used the old version of
zeppelin for the `before` screenshot. Could you update it?
---
If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2541
Thanks for the contribution. Could you check the failed job?
- https://travis-ci.org/XuMingmin/zeppelin/jobs/264931044
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2506
I didn't mean both. Just gave an opinion.
Personally, I don't believe that reviewer only can reply `LGTM` or `NO`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2526
I saw that people were asking there is this kind of permission.
-
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43971836/how-do-i-set-permissions-to-a-zeppelin-note-to-be-able-to-execute
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2528
Thanks for the contribution. Really nice and useful feature.
I guess you introduced new property `isExpanded` in setting. It would be
nice to include newly added the property in existing
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2506
@tinkoff-dwh Thanks for the update.
In feature and code level, it's good. But personally, I hope we can get
improved UI.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2503
1. Let's expose the config using REST API we already have.
-
http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/usage/rest_api/configuration.html#configuration-rest-api-list
2. Check
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2445
Hi @agura I guess you didn't setup travis CI for the forked repository.
- https://builds.apache.org/job/zeppelin-pull-request/2647/console
![image](https://user
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2503
Then, I think we need to hide when cookie manager is disabled.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2525
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2512
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2462
@malayhm Merged to master. Thanks for the contribution again!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2445
@agura Hi, you don't need to setup CI on your laptop.
1. Signup travis-ci.org
2. Change your repository incubator-zeppelin to `zeppelin`:
https://github.com/agura?tab=repositories
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2416
@bhavintandel I haven't checked this can be merged into the 0.7 branch. But
if there is no problem to merge, and we can include this PR in 0.7.3
- even if there's conflict, we can create
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2416
@yu74n Could you resolve conflict and check my last comment? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2512
I missed the notification for a while. Sorry for the late response. Let me
check and reply ASAP.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478
This is a new feature that makes utilizing graph type easily. Any other
opinions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2517
LGTM, merge if no more discussion. I refered
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2238/files
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2483
CI passed https://travis-ci.org/nokia/zeppelin/builds/256876805
merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
LGTM merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2462
Great!
LGTM, let's merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2510
@zjffdu is right. This is based on #2474 as described in the PR
description. Please review last 2 commits except for @zjffdu's commits.
- 80ecfba
- dd97d00
---
If your project
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2510
CI failed, but irrelevant. The error is related with Ipython which is going
on #2510
- https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/259230939/log.txt?deansi=true
```
Results
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2510
[ZEPPELIN-2756] Support ansi escape code for colorizing output in browser
### What is this PR for?
Support ANSI escape code for colorizing output in browser using
[ansi-up](https
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
@tinkoff-dwh It's the default binding in emacs mode.
## in default modes
https://github.com/ajaxorg/ace/wiki/Default-Keyboard-Shortcuts
![image](https://user
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2326
Hi @vipul1409 , Could you check
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2505?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2503
Thanks. I updated the previous comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2503
I don't have a preference, but in my experience, many web apps rely on the
browser provided remember-me feature. Here is an example of Github sign-in page
- https://github.com/login
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2500
I see. thanks for the answer.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2462
@malayhm cursor is still thick. Should I missing something? or..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
@tinkoff-dwh
1. I realized that `CTRL+F` is bound to `Moving cursor` in paragraphs. Can
we use `CTRL + OPT + F` (`ALT` in case of windows OS) or another key what you
think better
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2469
Will be handled later
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2469
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
@tinkoff-dwh Thank you for the update.
1. Can we add the shortcut into
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4968473/28510157-a6b31092-7081-11e7-99e9-1ad9894d9b75
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
Thanks for the review @sravan-s
Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2475
@yanboliang Sorry for the late response.
Thx for the contribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2500
Deployed
-
https://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/setup/security/shiro_authentication.html#ldap
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
[ZEPPELIN-2779] Unit test for job module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the `job` module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
@sravan-s I updated the PR, now websocket (un)subscription is handled in
this way
(https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497/commits/2e12c21197d916b864e3c29c627d929992ee89a2
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2483
Is this enough place to describe build options? What do you think of?
-
http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/setup/basics/how_to_build.html#build-command-examples
---
If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2500
@sohaibiftikhar Thanks for the contribution!
Travis CI is not set, but this is not relevant with CI.
LGTM. merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2483
Can we write docs to let the user know they can set these options using
maven profile?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2496
@tinkoff-dwh Thanks for the contribution.
Tested locally and works well. Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2493
Thanks for the review @sravan-s
Merge if no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
@sravan-s Please help review this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2491
Thanks for the reiview @sravan-s @tinkoff-dwh
Merge if no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2446
It was a long trip. Thanks for the update and fix. checked locally and it
works well.
Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2475
merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2489
It says `Looks like travis-ci is not configured for your fork.`
If you set already travis CI for your fork, could you provide the link? i
can help u.
---
If your project is set up
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
[ZEPPELIN-2779] Unit test for job module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the `job` module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally,
- removed
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2489
@desmorto Then could you close and reopen this PR to retrigger jenkins
again?
https://builds.apache.org/job/zeppelin-pull-request/2363/console
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
Thanks for implementing such a great feature!
1. Could you rebase against the current master? Since filenames were
changes, it would be easier to review after rebasing
2. Regarding UX
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2462
Hi, @malayhm Could you take a look the comment I left? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2474
Let create a PR to fix the ASCII issue, we can test this PR based on the
ASCII PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478
Thanks for the great feature! since this is a big change, I guess it takes
a time to review and requires multiple reviewers. Let me take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2446
@necosta Tested locally and it works well.
Could you rebase using the current master? since the base branch looks
quite old.
LGTM except for it.
---
If your project is set up
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2475
Left a comment, except for it, LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2458
CI is green, I think jenkins was restarted somehow.
- https://travis-ci.org/ebuildy/zeppelin/builds/253975556
LGTM merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2493
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2489
@desmorto thanks for the contribution.
1. Could you create a JIRA ticket?
2. files under `/thrift` are auto-generated, so we can't modify.
3. You need to the forked repository
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2493
[ZEPPELIN-2778] Unit test for credential module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the credential module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
Rebased to clean commit messages.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
rebased to fix some commit message which can't be handled in the merge
script. (`*`)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2493
[ZEPPELIN-2778] Unit test for credential module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the credential module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally, I
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2491
[ZEPPELIN-2777] Unit test for configuration module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the configuration module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2491
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2491
[ZEPPELIN-2777] Unit test for configuration module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the configuration module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally, I
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2458
@ebuildy I left a comment. Could u check that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2475
Thanks for the contribution @yanboliang. I left a comment. Could you check
that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2458
@ebuildy Thanks for the contribution.
Tested and works well, merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2473
Hi, Thanks for the contribution.
1. Could you make the failed job be green? -
https://travis-ci.org/ebuildy/zeppelin/jobs/251686246
2. Please make a JIRA ticket for this issue
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2487
LGTM merge if no more discussion.
referred
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/SQL_Injection_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet#Defense_Option_1:_Prepared_Statements_.28with_Parameterized_Queries.29
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
@soralee Thanks for the review. We need to keep the zeppelin-web module
clean. :)
Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2374
@khalidhuseynov Thanks for the update.
1. Could you describe the reason why we need to have separated setting
tabs? I mean, what note persistence setting should be under `Global Settings
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2477
Thanks for the review. @soralee. It enables us to write integration tests
easily. I will add some integration tests into zeppelin-web later based on
this.
Merge if no more discussion
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2448
well abstracted and tested PR. LGTM except for
- Currently, it seems that converting the note names only when creating /
renaming. Is it right? I so, can we rename them initially as you
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2460
and works well in mobile (iphone 6s chrome, sarari)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2460
Deployed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2477
[ZEPPELIN-2342] Improving Test Environment for zeppelin-web (e2e, coverage)
### What is this PR for?
Improved testing environment for zeppelin-web
- added `test:watch` command
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2477
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2477
[ZEPPELIN-2342] Improving Test Environment for zeppelin-web (e2e, coverage,
..)
### What is this PR for?
Improved testing environment for zeppelin-web
- added `test:watch
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
[ZEPPELIN-2749] Use scalable file structure for zeppelin web
### What is this PR for?
We have improved zeppelin-web, but some parts are still messy. As part of
keeping zeppelin-web
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
[ZEPPELIN-2749] Use scalable file structure for zeppelin web
### What is this PR for?
We have improved zeppelin-web, but some parts are still messy. As part of
keeping zeppelin-web
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2446
@necosta
I just built PR 2446 and remove `/conf/helium.json` and then installed 2
packages and reorder the icons,
1. But it takes longer than before. IMO, we just need to save
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437
Deployed
-
http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/usage/interpreter/interpreter_binding_mode.html
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437
Sure, users can easily access the doc.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2449
I have a suggestion.
- Place `Recent` before `Notebook` (more upper side)
- Limit the maximum number of recent notebooks.
That's because users are accessing recent notebook
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2429
Thanks for the quick reply.
There are 2 failed jobs. We can restart or need to fix them.
https://travis-ci.org/radicalbit/zeppelin/builds/250680464
---
If your project is set up
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2469
Thanks for the review. @soralee @sravan-s
we are using annotation for angular, but two angular conflicts. (bower side
required by angular-websocket)
Thus, I will change this PR
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437
@cacti77 it's provided as of 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.
-
http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/usage/interpreter/interpreter_binding_mode.html
here are the background
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2469
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2469
[ZEPPELIN-2725] Move angular related pkgs from bower to npm (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Move angular related packages from bower to npm. Because bower team
recommends using
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2460
checked that works well, merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2469
[ZEPPELIN-2725] Move angular related pkgs from bower to npm (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Move angular related packages from bower to npm. Because bower team
recommends using
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2460
Yeah, I guess it happens when browser size is small, probably related to
the change brought from 92f41bf
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437
it was an honor to make more correct, concise documentation with your help.
Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2429
Hi! Thanks for the contribution. @marcotagliabue.
It looks like useful!
1. Please fix the failed CI
2. Would be nice to rebase to update the outdated base branch
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437
Please let me know if we need to add / improve / modify something.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
101 - 200 of 1201 matches
Mail list logo