Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1754
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1746
@bitchelov Thanks for the contribution.
Do you mind update description of the PR?
PR description will be part of commit message when merged. So we expect
some meaningful description
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1737
@zjffdu Thanks!
LGTM and merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1752
LGTM.
Merge it as a hotfix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1733
Tested and LGTM.
Merge to master if there're no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1730
@tae-jun thanks for the great contribution!
LGTM and merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1675
LGTM and merge to master if there're no further discussions.
@khalidhuseynov Great work!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1722
LGTM and merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1744
Merge to master if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1744
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1612
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1739
@andreistankevich could you close this PR if you accidentally created?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1728
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1734
@1ambda that looks more make sense to me.
fyi, a related PR https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/423
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1734
Thanks @1ambda for working on UX improvement.
Personally, i'd prefer keep items in 1 column. Because it displays
interpreter names (e.g. %spark, %pyspark, etc) at predictable location
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1727
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1692
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more discussions.
Great work @cloverhearts !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/commit/cb0b45080251b224f44abe8719865b756290a397#commitcomment-20082316
I made mistake on backporting this commit. Our merge tool couldn't handle
this case so i manually cherrypicked and resolved
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1725
@soralee reported that branch-0.6 is also failing with this problem.
And i confirmed branch-0.6 build fails with the same problem and this fixes
the problem.
So i'm going to back
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1723
Thanks @cuspymd for providing review.
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1724
@prabhjyotsingh Thanks.
Merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1663
Tried but still no luck ..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1724
Thanks @prabhjyotsingh for the review.
I think other charts doesn't have these options.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1663
Tried but no button is displayed. Maybe i'm missing something?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1713
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user Leemoonsoo reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1724
[ZEPPELIN-1674] save barchart, areachart option
### What is this PR for?
Persist
- bar graph options (grouped, stacked)
- area graph option: (stacked, stream, expanded
Github user Leemoonsoo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1724
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1692
Tested and LGTM. Thanks @cloverhearts for the fix!
Could you resolve the conflict?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1725
Thanks for the fix.
Confirmed it fixes build problem if i remove node_modules bower_components
directories. LGTM.
While the bug breaks build, merge this patch to master
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1630
Merge to master if there're no more comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1723
Thanks @marchpig for the fix.
Thanks @tae-jun for the review.
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1724
[ZEPPELIN-1674] save barchart, areachart type
### What is this PR for?
Persist
- bar graph options (grouped, stacked)
- area graph option: (stacked, stream, expanded
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
@krskoondra Could you let me know you apache JIRA id?
so i can assign you in this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1637 issue and resolve.
---
If your project is set up
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1630
Great work @tae-jun. LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1711
Merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1675
@khalidhuseynov sounds good.
Let's wait for CI becomes green. Other than that, Looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1675
Tested and it works well. Great work @khalidhuseynov.
But when i visit revision, shouldn't it be immutable? i can still edit and
run.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
@krskoondra Thanks for the nice feature.
Merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1714
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1715
Merge to master if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1630
Tested and working really nicely. Looks awesome to me!
Thanks @tae-jun for the great contribution!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
CI test failed with
```
Results :
Tests in error:
ParagraphActionsIT.testRemoveButton:155->AbstractZeppelinIT.clickAndWait:131 »
ElementNotVisi
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1715
Thanks @soralee for the nice improvement.
Tested and LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1711
I think test failures are irrelevant to this change. Ready to review.
```
AngularElem
- should able to be created from implicit conversion
Run completed in 1 second, 632
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1712
Tested and LGTM. Thanks @khalidhuseynov for the update.
Merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
If i assume your remote name for Zeppelin repository is `apache-github`
(you can check it by running `git remote -v`),
First, fetch Zeppelin repo (to get latest master) with `git
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1708
Thanks @Tagar @astroshim for the review. Merge to master if there're no
further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1711
[ZEPPELIN-1721] Let each visualization define 'setting'.
### What is this PR for?
ZEPPELIN-1003 made an abstraction layer for visualization and now
visualizations are moved to [zeppelin
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1702
Merge to master if there're no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1707
Merge to master if there're no further comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1709
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1658
@agoodm merged master and addressed tests added from #1632.
CI failure is not related. Merge to master.
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1540981/20757762
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1441
@cloverhearts Thanks for the explanation. Keeping search with real time job
monitoring make sense.
LGTM and merge to master. if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
Thanks @krskoondra for the contribution.
LGTM.
merge to master if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1706
LGTM and merge to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1707
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1708
[ZEPPELIN-1728] Add an example configuring classpath for hive-site.xml
### What is this PR for?
hive-site.xml is required to configure HiveContext in SparkInterpreter.
So it'll
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1677
Merge to master if there're no further discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1566
Using --proxy-user instead of doAs would work?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1730
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1699
Tested and LGTM.
Merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1702
Tested and it works well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1691
Tested and LGTM. Thanks @zjffdu for the fix!
Merge to master if there're no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1672
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1704 changes the filename
processenduser.md to userimpersonation.md. Could you resolve conflict?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1704
Merge to master as a hotfix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1704
[HOT FIX] Fix broken link
### What is this PR for?
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1554 added a `processenduser.md`,
but the navigation menu different name on it's link
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1679
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1617
@matthewLiem Maybe, some jdbc driver may support some parameters like
`?autocommit=true` in it's connection url. But it depends on driver
implementation whether they have such feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1658
Thanks @agoodm @khalidhuseynov for the review!
Merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1660
@jongyoul I think key requirement of personalized mode is two or more
different user want to keep their own dynamic form input and the output of
paragraph. How can this be done without let
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1637
@cloverhearts Thanks for the great contribution.
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1685
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1647
Although it changes user experience, it is more consistent behavior
considering other type of dynamic form behavior (input, checkbox).
Regarding the test, while other types of dynamic
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1688
Top right corner of each paragraph was pretty crowded in early days of
Zeppelin.
Run, Move up, Move down, Delete, Show title, Show codes, Hides output, and
so on.
Because
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1637
I still can see some unnecessary changes on the import code block in many
files.
Could you manage them unchanged? I have listed files in previous comment.
---
If your project is set up
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1686
Ctrl+Alt+L sounds good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1686
Thanks @soralee for the contribution.
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1683
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1612
Looks good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1658
I think this PR is ready to be reviewed.
While this PR includes quite a lot of changes i'm highlighting some key
changes.
1. Display multiple types of output in a single paragraph
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1673
Tested and LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1593
@zjffdu Looks great to me!
Merge to master if there're no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1339
In case of
1) Don't have plan to use spark interpreter, just want to use other
interpreters like python, big query.
2) Set SPARK_HOME in interpreter property instead of conf
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1637
Could you keep following files unchanged and resolve conflict with master?
bigquery/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/bigquery/BigQueryInterpreter.java
cassandra/src/main/java/org
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1677
@m30m Awesome!
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1656
LGTM and merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613
Make sense. @karup1990 what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1654
Thanks @felixcheung for the review. Merge to mater if there is no more
comment!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1613
@zjffdu Right. Isolated mode can create multiple spark applications.
@karup1990 @zjffdu how can we handle multiple spark applications?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1670
@astroshim Thanks for the contribution.
Could you edit default value from
[here](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-zengine/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/conf
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1539
Tested and LGTM.
Merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1669
LGTM and merge to master as a hotfix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1654
CI Green now. please review this.
Once it's merged, i'd like to add some tutorials that leverage this feature.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1660
@jongyoul Could you describe more about the personalized mode? I don't
think current implementation is anywhere close to personalized mode discussed
in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1656
Merge to master if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1656
Thanks @astroshim for the fix.
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1664
Thanks @cloverhearts for taking care.
LGTM and merge to master as a Hotfix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1624
Merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1657
Re-triggered CI and failure is irrelevant to this change.
Merge if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1652
Merge to master if there're no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1645
Merge if there're no more discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
901 - 1000 of 1451 matches
Mail list logo