Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1030
@astroshim Merged, next time please check JIRA issue - it should be
assigned to somebody (you, in this case) and has a "Fix Version" set.
This simplified life of the release man
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
### CI failure debug approach
First thing to do in order to debug such issues:
- link all raw build logs
- extact and systematize failure resaons from logs (usulaly it's last
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1030
Merging if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1100
Looks good to me, \cc @corneadoug @felizbear for review of the frontend part
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1064
Thank you!
Looks good to me, mering if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1094
CI failure is not related and handled under
[ZEPPELIN-1073](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1073)
Merging if there is no further disucssion
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1094
CI fails on Integration tests, and failure looks different from #1091 and
#1092
```
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 143.455 sec
- in
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1090
Merging if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1030
Looks great to me!
Let's create a JIRA issue for current failure with label `flaky-tests` and
merge this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1094
Rebased on latest master, after #1092 got merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1092
CI passes now, and changes looks great to me.
Let's merge if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1094
Ready to be merged, \cc @minahlee @prabhjyotsingh for review.
CI failure is being taken care of under #1092
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1091
@prabhjyotsingh on closing the JIRA issues, please do not forget to set
correct `fix version` field.
It's 0.7.0 now if changes were merged only to master, I have updated 1065
---
If
GitHub user bzz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1094
ZEPPELIN-1063: fix flaky python interpreter test
### What is this PR for?
fix flaky python interpreter test
### What type of PR is it?
Bug Fix
### Todos
* [ ] cleanup
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1091
Sounds good, and this PR looks great to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1091
Thank you for pointing out
[ZEPPELIN-1063](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1063) - have
updated it's description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1091
@prabhjyotsingh thank you for fixing this one!
What do you think, if would it make sense to reduce total wait time and get
this test more stable with a wait polling implementation to locate
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1090
Looks great to me, thank you for fixing!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1041
Looks awesome to me, CI failure tacked under
[ZEPPELIN-862](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-862)
```
23:25:52,963 INFO org.apache.zeppelin.socket.NotebookServer:1193 - Job
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1030
There are multiple CI failures
- JSON parsing failure somewhere in websocket communication
```
Running
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
Thank you for your patience!
Could you rebase your work on latest master please and I'll be happy to
look into the CI build failures again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/836
Looks great, do you plan to rebase on master as well?
I think there was also @anish18sun using it under
[ZEPPELIN-684](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-684) so \cc
@anish18sun
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1075
Thank you guys for fast catching this one and HotFixing!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1067
done in 97f25e2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1067
cherry-picking to branch-0.6 fails with merge conflicts as master and
branch-0.6 diverged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1063
Looks awesome to me, thank you!
I think it's ready to merge, if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1067
Thank you guys for the prompt reviews!
@Leemoonsoo agree on API change and I'm glad to have it merged in 0.6,
updated JIRA
@minahlee review addressed in 3b1ad36
If there
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1067
It is ready to be merged now.
TODOs will be addressed in different PR, after #1063 is merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user bzz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1067
ZEPPELIN-1048: Pandas support for python interpreter
### What is this PR for?
### What type of PR is it?
Feature
### Todos
* [x] fix NPE in logs on empty paragraph
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1063
BTW while we are here, how do you think shall we also set
`zeppelin.python.maxResult` to 1000?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1065
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1063
Looks great to me, thank you @minahlee !
Will merge, if there is no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1042
Both suggestions are nice addition, and there is also a refactoring on
TODOs so I guess it's WIP now.
ð for making it part of the release, as discussed dev@z.a.o
---
If your proje
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/989
Thank you very much @onkarshedge ! I will go though it and let you know
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1013
Ok, thanks for explanation, this was not a strong opinion, just a question.
Sounds good to me.
@minahlee what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
That sounds great @rawkintrevo on licenses !
Sorry, in preparation to 0.6 release people get quite busy..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1055
Looks good to me, let's test and merge right after #1043
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1030
ð for having tests!
Two things:
1. Code
Instead of locking on the map (`synchronized(credentialsMap){...}`), would
it make sense to rather replace `credentialsMap` with
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/919
To be able to change indention is very reasonable option, esp. as soon as
you start working with Python.
@astroshim It could be hard to implement per-interpreter as @Leemoonsoo
suggests for
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/994
Got it, thank for reminding! Let's merge this guy then
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1043
I think we should merge it ASAP as per
[ZEPPELIN-889](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-889) this blocks
us from makeing a release.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1041
Looks great to me, sans rebased on master and a minor javadoc issue above.
I think it's good to merge as soon as those are addressed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1032
Thank you for prompt reviews!
Merging fi there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1033
CI failed due to networking issues
```
INFO: I/O exception (java.net.SocketException) caught when processing
request to {s}->https://repo.maven.apache.org:443: Connection reset
Jun
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1034
Sounds great! Shall we merge this guy then, and handle this nasty click in
`ParagraphActionIT.testCreateNewButton` in separate pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1013
Now we have 3 drop-down menus :) Are you guys sure that we can not get away
with just 2 of them i.e 'logout' instead of 'about' in under the gear icon?
Also, for the
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/989
Hi @onkarshedge, as mid-term evaluation starts soon, I think it's crucial
to get answers on 2 previous questions now.
>Could you also point to some document with high-level descriptio
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1043
Looks good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/994
Looks awesome to me, thank you @minahlee !
2 minor things are a bit confusing:
- the purpose of `dev/publish_release.sh.hehe` file
- some artifacts (namely, integration for Geode and
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1034
Looks great to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1032
Makes perfect sense to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user bzz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1033
Python: fix for 'run all' paragraphs
### What is this PR for?
Switch to FIFO scheduler as in current implementation `.interpret()` is not
thread-safe and so in parallel one 'Run
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1032
I'm planning to add at least one more tutorial notebook of using python,
something similar to what we have for Apache Spark but with pandas and
matplotlib etc.
Do you guys think advance
GitHub user bzz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1032
ZEPPELIN-1027: Python - add basic matplotlib example notebook
### What is this PR for?
It adds basic matplotlib example notebook.
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1028
@prabhjyotsingh if we could point what is the reason of failure and link to
either PR or existing JIRA issue that handles it - that could help improve our
infrastructure a lot
Looks good to
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1024
Now this PR contains some commits that do not belong here, and it either
needs to be re-created from a separate branch as @corneadoug points out, or
interactively rebased with keeping only good
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/928
Great work, @rawkintrevo ! It looks like a rebase on the latest master is
needed now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1015
@corneadoug sounds good! Screenshot is in the logs in base64.
Could you post current CI failure in the same way as I did above? Then we
could iterate faster on it
---
If your project is set up
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1023
Looks great to me, thank you @AhyoungRyu @felixcheung !
Let's merge if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1010
Looks great to me, thank you @AhyoungRyu
Will merge to master, if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1018
Sounds great, thank you for explanation
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1015
on #1021 in
[logs](https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/137973583/log.txt) I
can see
**ParagraphActionsIT.testRemoveButton
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/966
Yes.. and this method does not work if the default interpreter is set to
Python for the notebook
![screen shot 2016-06-17 at 01 03
50](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5582506/16123862
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1021
Thank you for prompt reviews!
Merging if there is no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1013
@corneadoug thanks for posting screen! It looks reasonable
> and put every items under this single button?
> Either way, i think it's better than now.
True, as soon as
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/933
@swkimme ping on the status of this patch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/994
@minahlee Great!
I think it should be ready to merge as soon as issues highlighted above
a. failing networking `curl`
b. build configuration duplication
are
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1021
CI failure is not related and is taken care of under #1015
```
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 34.3 sec -
in
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1013
> @bzz actually, last time I tested, the about dropdown was doing great on
mobile
Have you already tested 2 proposed dropdowns on mobile? If possible, plz
share the screenshots
---
If y
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1014
Let's merge the guy if there is no further discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1016
@minahlee looks great, let's merge it
@darionyaphet all release-related question are discussed on dev@ mailing
list and tracked under
[ZEPPELIN-889](https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1018
Is it a build WARNING or an actual error?
Asking as have not seen CI build failure due to this error before
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user bzz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1021
Python interpreter and doc cleanup
### What is this PR for?
This is first step improving current Python interpreter implementation.
It has just a cleanup, style and docs improvements
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1020
ð looks great, let's merge!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/836
@khalidhuseynov Just FYI, this PR adds 4 new messages websocket protocol:
```
APP_APPEND_OUTPUT, // [s-c] append output
APP_UPDATE_OUTPUT, // [s-c] update (replace) output
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1013
Just FYI - please mind that second menu should play nice with mobile
layout.
As first one is collapsed on mobile, even right now with just a search
search - it sometimes is not enough space
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/836
Great stuff!! It's going to take some time to review.
@Leemoonsoo @minahlee Please help me understand, do you think this should
be included in 0.6.0 release? As I do not see
[ZEPPELI
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1007
Good point, if asked, I would say that having `NotebookRepoSync implements
NotebookRepo` is not an elegant design either - NotebookRepoSync is not a
NoteboksRepo! :)
It's up to you afte
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1015
@corneadoug as a first step, how about re-open the PR to trigger CI and
see, which ones are reproducible by posting same report for new CI build
results?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1015
Two CI failures here
1. **Python test failure**
[logs](https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/137725472/log.txt)
AFAIK never seen before (might be related to #1009
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1017
@davidtzoor great to see new visualization! Could you rebase on top of the
latest master please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/994
Thank you for the feedback @echarles !
I think it should be fine to add missing bits, as soon as they are
identified and there is somebody with actual use case for it later on. Would
you be
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/976
@cloverhearts thank you for adding tests!
Looks great to me, merging if there is no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/994
Great, I think if checking error conditions could be added to
network-related commands - it would be even more awesome, as this is quite
common failure pattern.
Other then that, looks great
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/989
@onkarshedge I understand that it's WIP, just wanted to remind that
eventually your `NotebookRepo` implementation should user
`NotebookRepoVersioned`, see Git one as an example.
Coul
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/933
@swakrish do you think it's ready to be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1010
Thanks for prompt response!
Your documentation update looks great to me, modulo few minor suggestions
above.
Please feel free to use them at your will, otherwise I think it's rea
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1010
@AhyoungRyu great job! Let me take another pass on it plz.
BTW is removal of `conf/shiro.ini` a part of the quickstart?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1000
Last commit needs to be removed by using git interactive rebase, as it's
been taken care of under #1009
It would also be great to have more descriptive PR title like `Fix typo in
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1007
Thank you for addressing feedback promptly.
Well, in my oppinion, if by "encourage more versioned implementation" you
mean having this code duplicated 5 times around the code base
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1002
Looks great to me and CI passes now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1009
Thank you for the prompt responce!
CI passes now and fix solves the issue and looks great to me.
Merging if there is no further discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1012
Thank you @jongyoul, ð for having tests!
Improving this further by generalizing to other interpreters after a
release sounds like a very good plan.
Looks great to me.
---
If your
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1005
Looks great, thank you for prompt update!
@jongyoul is there a reason to make it configurable from another PR instead
of this one? Just curious
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1007
Great improvement!
Could you please explain the rationale behind removing
`NotebookRepoVersioned` and making a lot of boilerplate methods returning
`null` in all other notebook storages
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1009
@OutOfBedlam thank you for catching this and contributing the improvement!
Before merging, could you please check that your code follows [project code
style
guide](https://github.com/apache
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1011
Thanks for catching it, looks great to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/908
@cloverhearts exciting changes! This would help us to make convenience
binary for a release smaller as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/994
Looks great, I think there are just few things left:
- rebased on latest master
- check that code conforms the [conventions from our style
guide](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/976
@cloverhearts yes, if that is not very hard to do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
501 - 600 of 690 matches
Mail list logo