Github user DrIgor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2039
Ping-ping)
Do you have other questions? Do you think it's better to proper synchronize
`terminate` flag instead?
I reviewed code to understand how zeppelin core works and found
GitHub user DmytroShkvyra opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2089
[ZEPPELIN-791] Build infra: move all RAT to root pom.xml
What is this PR for?
It is better have a single place where we manage project-wise RAT
exclusions for a contributions under
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2051
Merging this if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user DmytroShkvyra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2075
add wildcard
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2039
From my understanding, setting a flag to let the thread gracefully runs to
end, seems safer than calling `interrupt` on it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user soralee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2045
Ping! @Leemoonsoo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2054
Merging this if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user soralee closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2073
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user soralee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2073
CI is [green](https://travis-ci.org/soralee/zeppelin/builds/206890162) but
Jenkins is failed. So I reopen this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user soralee reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2073
[ZEPPELIN-2130][Doc]Do not use web development port
### What is this PR for?
If user uses web application development port such like 9000 which is
default value, Zeppelin is not working
Github user andrykrp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085
Looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user DmytroShkvyra reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2089
[ZEPPELIN-791] Build infra: move all RAT to root pom.xml
What is this PR for?
It is better have a single place where we manage project-wise RAT
exclusions for a contributions under
Github user DmytroShkvyra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2089
@felixcheung Could you review my PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user DrIgor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2039
`interrupt` just sets `Thread.isInterrupted` flag and does not immediately
stop the thread. Then thread can check this flag and decide if it needs to
stop. So in fact, termination logic remains
Github user DmytroShkvyra closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2089
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1985
@FireArrow ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user vipul1409 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2090
ZEPPELIN-2199: Fix lapply issue in sparkR
### What is this PR for?
Function createRDDFromArray used for creating R RDD expects a
JavaSparkContext object instead of spark context. This PR
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2074
@1ambda did you get time to review this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user FireArrow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1985
Terribly sorry for late answer! Not sure why I didn't get any notifications
about your answers :confused:
@zjffdu I haven't looked into who actually sends the signal, but if it is
as you
Emanuel Damian Paz created ZEPPELIN-2204:
Summary: Logout redirect "/" not context-path
Key: ZEPPELIN-2204
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2204
Project: Zeppelin
Github user prabhjyotsingh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2086
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2086
[ZEPPELIN-2167] User with insufficient privileges can still restore files
by renaming files in/out of Trash
### What is this PR for?
User with insufficient privileges can still
Github user Malian commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1545
@zjffdu What's the status of this pull request ? Can we expect it will be
merged soon ? Thank you !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user weand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2062
Rebased and green now. Thanks for your help.
Would you mind merging that into branch-0.7 as well?
Regarding docu:
The LDAP Realm section in the docu
Mathieu D created ZEPPELIN-2205:
---
Summary: pages are emtpy, can't open a notebook
Key: ZEPPELIN-2205
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2205
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2084
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1545
@zjffdu Sadly there are some conflicts now. Could you resolve them?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user andreaTP opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2091
Env variable to configure maven central repo
### What is this PR for?
When deploying Zeppelin in private Cloud or within closed networks, it
happens that Maven Central isn't directly
GitHub user prabhjyotsingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2092
[ZEPPELIN-2148] On creation of Bar graph zeppelin UI shows it as minigraph
- 2
### What is this PR for?
This is based on
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2074
Sure, I'll merge this soon, and have created a new PR
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2092 as this has merge conflict with
master. Please feel free to review that as well.
---
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2086
Merging this to master and branch-0.7 if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2082
Merge to branch-0.7 if no further comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2074
@prabhjyotsingh sorry for late reply :sob:
- Tested and works well as described.
- `ng-if` is great implementation!, since they will re-draw
- It would be nice if we apply this
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2037
Tested and works as described.
- LGTM except
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2037#pullrequestreview-24893904
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user vipul1409 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2090
Can anyone help me understand the build error it looks unrelated to my
change,
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2080
Merge into branch-0.7 if there are no more comments on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2077
LGTM ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2042
Merge into master and branch-0.7 if there are no more comments on this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2071
LGTM ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2037
@1ambda Thanks for the review. Sadly there some conflicts. Let me updated
again :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user vipul1409 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2090
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user vipul1409 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2090
ZEPPELIN-2199: Fix lapply issue in sparkR
### What is this PR for?
Function createRDDFromArray used for creating R RDD expects a
JavaSparkContext object instead of spark context. This PR
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2091
try close and reopen this PR to trigger Travis
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2079
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2091
Did you switch on 'zeppelin' repository from https://travis-ci.org/profile
(https://zeppelin.apache.org/contribution/contributions.html#continuous-integration)
?
Also after
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2090
Did you switch on 'zeppelin' repository from https://travis-ci.org/profile
(https://zeppelin.apache.org/contribution/contributions.html#continuous-integration)
?
Also after
46 matches
Mail list logo
