Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1809
Cool. It also looks like CI is passing.
Merging if no more comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1821
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1304
I think this can be closed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1892:
Summary: Display label vertically or horizontally smartly
Key: ZEPPELIN-1892
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1892
Project: Zeppelin
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1891:
Summary: Allow to display percentage in pie chart
Key: ZEPPELIN-1891
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1891
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type:
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1890:
Summary: Groups in pie chart is a little misleading
Key: ZEPPELIN-1890
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1890
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1822
@Leemoonsoo Sounds good. Let me update then :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1822
Thanks @AhyoungRyu for the improvement.
How about use
Jeff Zhang created ZEPPELIN-1889:
Summary: Multiple groups in chart doesn't work
Key: ZEPPELIN-1889
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1889
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Bug
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1812
Tested and it works well.
@1ambda Could you explain little bit about how `zeppelin-web/yarn.lock` can
be updated
in case of new dependency or dependency version change in
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1799
@zjffdu
Yes you are right.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1799
Thanks @cloverhearts , after reading #1176. This PR is the first phase of
this feature (implement low level api for workflow), is that correct ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user khalidhuseynov reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1775
[ZEPPELIN-1745] View revisions in non-editable mode
### What is this PR for?
This is to make view of revisions non-editable
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
Github user khalidhuseynov closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1775
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1831
hmm, it works in local mode but doesn't work in yarn-client mode. Could you
try yarn-client mode ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1824
LGTM and merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1818
LGTM and merge to master if there're no further discussions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1831
@zjffdu
I'v just created gist to show `--packages` option download
pyspark-cassandra.
https://gist.github.com/1ambda/5caf92753ea2f95ada11b1c13945d261
```
downloading
Github user soralee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1820
Thank you @Leemoonsoo !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1820
LGTM and merge to master if there're no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1799
@zjffdu
I agree with you.
But I am a bit cautious about this part.
In fact, we've re-implemented this functionality in a variety of ways, and
we've actually implemented it in the
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1832
@felixcheung Thank you for review!
Currently only `COMMON_KEY` uses for max line count in JDBC interpreter but
as like you mentioned it seems more make sense to move the code to `open()`
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1799
BTW, in the first phase we can provide the high-level framework to allow
user to call it programmatically, And in the second phase, it would be better
to allow user to do it though drag & drop in
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1831
@zjffdu Thanks for review :)
Then, How can I load
[pyspark-cassandra](https://github.com/TargetHolding/pyspark-cassandra#with-spark-packages)
for pyspark?
---
If your project is set up
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1799
@cloverhearts What I mean is that the code like following would be called
many times by users
```
if (z.getZeppelinJobStatus("execute note id", "execute paragraph
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1831
right, I'm a bit concern if this would be the right fix for the issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1587
all green!
merging if no more comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1829
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1831
@1ambda Spark doesn't support specifying python packages throught
`--packages`, the correct usage is to use `--py-files`. Although this PR could
resolve your issue, but the issue here is not due
Ahyoung Ryu created ZEPPELIN-1888:
-
Summary: RemoteInterpreterServer processes are still alive even if
Zeppelin server stopped
Key: ZEPPELIN-1888
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1888
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1833
Seems the streaming output works only once right after I start Zeppelin (or
restart shell intp). Let me dig into more. Thanks for the review @astroshim
@Leemoonsoo!
---
If your project is
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1821
Then will merge into master if there are no more comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user astroshim reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1832
[ZEPPELIN-1884] Prevent NullPointerException when JDBC query.
### What is this PR for?
Sometimes users don't want to set the properties which they don't want to
care about and
Github user astroshim closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1832
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user purechoc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1587
i think CI failure cause is not this PR.
some other reason in other testcase.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1799
@cloverhearts This is very interesting. I have a few questions
1. Does the dynamic forms here mean more control flow (like if condition
and for loop)
2. In case 2, If the markdown
GitHub user purechoc reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1587
[ZEPPELIN-1609] using pyspark(python3) with livy interperter
### What is this PR for?
using pyspark(python3) with livy interperter
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
Github user purechoc closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1587
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Hello, Zeppelin our users and our developers.
I am created zeppelin workflow on codebase feature.
But, actually I wish find a good method than my implement workflow method
better. (before pr https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1799)
for example, I made workflow is this here.
---
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-1887:
--
Summary: "Run all paragraphs" adds new paragraph
Key: ZEPPELIN-1887
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1887
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
CloverHearts created ZEPPELIN-1886:
--
Summary: Codebased job workflow
Key: ZEPPELIN-1886
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1886
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Improvement
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1799
create new issue on jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1886
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1833
Tested but i also see the same result @astroshim has.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1831
@astroshim Thanks for review!
It's the expected behavior. If spark submit doens't be properly loaded,
spark interpreter will die without errors.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1815
Merge to master if there're no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1821
Tested and LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1729
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Egor Pahomov created ZEPPELIN-1885:
--
Summary: Add retry functionality to JDBC interpreter
Key: ZEPPELIN-1885
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1885
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1833
Hi.
In my case it seems doesn`t work properly.. What am i missing?
---
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1831
In my test, I got a ` INFO [2017-01-02 09:08:12,358] ({Exec Default
Executor} RemoteInterpreterManagedProcess.java[onProcessComplete]:164) -
Interpreter process exited 0` error when i try to
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1821
Tested this branch and checked the verbose forbidden error messages(my
bad..) are totally gone when I turned off Shiro. Thanks @cloverhearts!
LGTM ð
---
If your project is set up for
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1807
I made a PR for editing those values in GUI. @felixcheung I think it would
be better to make a new PR to describe interpreter-setting.json fully.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1716
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1730
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1817
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1827
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1830
@zjffdu Nice!
In the past `Spark Tutorial` is the only tutorial note in Zeppelin included
by default. But after this PR, 5 tutorial notes will be shown to Zeppelin new
commers. Since
57 matches
Mail list logo
