[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2394: [gh-pages] [ZEPPELIN-2597] adding technologies and dep...

Github user soralee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2394 @1ambda, How about that connecting the latest version documentation? we'd better to guide the latest version to user. ``` spark -

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2410: [ZEPPELIN-2645] Adding way to register RemoteInterpret...

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2410 Yeah, I mean Server broadcasts a message to all clients only after it receive message from client. It looks like Method `channelRead0` is invoked after it get message from client. There's no api

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2410: [ZEPPELIN-2645] Adding way to register RemoteInterpret...

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2410 Yeah, I see that example. But it seems server can only send message to client only when it receive data from client (`SecureChatServerHandler.java`). How does server send request to client

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2410: [ZEPPELIN-2645] Adding way to register RemoteInterpret...

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2410 @zjffdu Did you see the link I sent you? In that example, server keeps the channel when client bind at the first time. then, server can send any data through that channel when it wants to do it.

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2410: [ZEPPELIN-2645] Adding way to register RemoteInterpret...

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2410 @jongyoul I still don't understand why we can only set up only one server-client via netty. Maybe I miss something here. e.g. We set up netty server in zeppelin-server and netty client in

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2435: [ZEPPELIN-2688]. Upgrade ace to 1.2.7

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2435 @1ambda @minahlee Could you help review it ? Thanks --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2428: [ZEPPELIN-1470] limiting results from jdbc

Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2428 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2437: [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter binding mod...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437 @zjffdu Thanks. Let me add the description into the doc. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2437: [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter bind...

GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437 [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter binding modes ### What is this PR for? Updated `interpreter_binding_mode.md` since users are sometimes confused what this mode means and

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2437: [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter bind...

Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2442: [ZEPPELIN-2679] JDBC. precode for session

GitHub user tinkoff-dwh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2442 [ZEPPELIN-2679] JDBC. precode for session ### What is this PR for? We have a precode for interpreter (all interpreters) which executes once after start interpreter. With it we can create

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2433: [ZEPPELIN-2684] Flaky Test: ParagraphActionsIT.testSin...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2433 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2433: [ZEPPELIN-2684] Flaky Test: ParagraphActionsIT.testSin...

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2433 It's realistic solution until we fix it completely. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2441: [ZEPPELIN-2683] fix: should provide horizontal ...

GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2441 [ZEPPELIN-2683] fix: should provide horizontal scrollbar for table ### What is this PR for? fixed to use a more broad column width (150+) - the default is 150 - if

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2441: [ZEPPELIN-2683] fix: should provide horizontal ...

Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2441 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2441: [ZEPPELIN-2683] fix: should provide horizontal ...

GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2441 [ZEPPELIN-2683] fix: should provide horizontal scrollbar for table ### What is this PR for? fixed to use a more broad column width (150+) - the default is 150 - if

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2407: [ZEPPELIN-1907] Shell Interpreter does not rene...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2407 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2440: [ZEPPELIN-2587] allow logging in if you're anonymous

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2440 Could we add a simple selenium test for this ? Regression issue is bad thing. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2374: [ZEPPELIN-2593] Add storage settings to persist on com...

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2374 What is the current persistent policy ? Does it persist on every run ? And the property name `zeppelin.notebook.persist.on.commit` is a little confusing to me. * If it is set to

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2437: [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter binding mod...

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437 It is better to mention in what dimension of these modes. (per user or per note). And from the code perspective, there's only one `InterpreterGroup` for scoped mode, but multiple sessions in

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2437: [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter binding mod...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437 CI failed but irrelevant. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2374: [ZEPPELIN-2593] Add storage settings to persist...

GitHub user khalidhuseynov reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2374 [ZEPPELIN-2593] Add storage settings to persist on commit ### What is this PR for? adding settings to storage layer to let user choose to persist continuously or only on commits

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2374: [ZEPPELIN-2593] Add storage settings to persist...

Github user khalidhuseynov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2374 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2415: [ZEPPELIN-2661] [WIP] Test: personalized mode action

Github user soralee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2415 @jongyoul sounds good! I'll created JIRA ticket to improve personalized mode and test, after merge. @zjffdu in my local, it works very well. and even my CI is failing other selenium.

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2239: Show dialog if owners field set to be empty on ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2239 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2394: [gh-pages] [ZEPPELIN-2597] adding technologies and dep...

Github user soralee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2394 @1ambda Thanks for arranging list Updated it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2401: [gh-pages] [ZEPPELIN-2597] updating navbar and main se...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2401 merge if no more discussion --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2437: [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter binding mod...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437 I added your summary table.  --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2415: [ZEPPELIN-2661] [WIP] Test: personalized mode action

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2415 Could we run it many times to make sure this is not flaky test ? Sadly, I see flaky test in selenium test very often. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2415: [ZEPPELIN-2661] [WIP] Test: personalized mode action

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2415 We'd better divide this test into two or three issues as it's not passed by some minor bugs --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2415: [ZEPPELIN-2661] [WIP] Test: personalized mode action

Github user jongyoul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2415 Simple action test LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

Livy failure

Hi all, I am trying to connect and run note via livy *created interpreter setting:* livy.spark.driver.cores 1 livy.spark.driver.memory 1g livy.spark.dynamicAllocation.cachedExecutorIdleTimeout 600 livy.spark.dynamicAllocation.enabled true livy.spark.dynamicAllocation.initialExecutors 1

Re: Livy failure

Got it, thank you. 2017-06-26 14:58 GMT+03:00 Jeff Zhang : > > The error message is clear, you didn't set the right configuration. You > enable the dynamic allocation, and set max executor as 2 but you set the > initial executor as 3 > > > > Caused by:

Re: Livy failure

Here is the failure from resource manager 17/06/26 05:55:43 ERROR ApplicationMaster: Uncaught exception: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Exception thrown in awaitResult: at org.apache.spark.util.ThreadUtils$.awaitResult(ThreadUtils.scala:194) at

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2440: [ZEPPELIN-2587] allow logging in if youre anony...

GitHub user herval opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2440 [ZEPPELIN-2587] allow logging in if youre anonymous ### What is this PR for? The login button is not showing (since 0.7.1) if you allow anonymous access. This shows it again.

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2439: [ZEPPELIN-2680] allow opening notebook as a rea...

GitHub user herval opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2439 [ZEPPELIN-2680] allow opening notebook as a reader ### What is this PR for? We have a few notebooks that have a list of writers & owners, but no restricted readers list. When you try

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2694) Build failure

Amin Abbasi created ZEPPELIN-2694: - Summary: Build failure Key: ZEPPELIN-2694 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2694 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Bug Components:

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2438: [WIP][ZEPPELIN-2693] Test: interpreter mode act...

GitHub user soralee opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2438 [WIP][ZEPPELIN-2693] Test: interpreter mode action test ### What is this PR for? Adding to interpreter mode (globally shared mode, Per user/Scoped mode, Per user/isolated mode) action case

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2436: [ZEPPELIN-2690] fix: should respect helium vis order i...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2436 Thanks for the review. @tinkoff-dwh. merge if no more discussion. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2401: [gh-pages] [ZEPPELIN-2597] updating navbar and main se...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2401 I think it's ok to use the prefix for 0.7.2. Then, we can deploy before 0.8.0 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2437: [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter binding mod...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437 CI failed but irrelevant. - https://travis-ci.org/1ambda/zeppelin/jobs/246983015 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2693) adding Interpreter mode test

Sora Lee created ZEPPELIN-2693: -- Summary: adding Interpreter mode test Key: ZEPPELIN-2693 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2693 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Test

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2373: [ZEPPELIN-2598] Securing Zeppelin with OpenID Connect

Github user andreaTP commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2373 @Leemoonsoo @felixcheung @1ambda I have had to rebase on master again after a week of no updates. Please tell me what to do to on this to get it merged or why this is not going to be

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2692) pyspark die on second run error

TitusFong created ZEPPELIN-2692: --- Summary: pyspark die on second run error Key: ZEPPELIN-2692 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2692 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-2691) Setting menu for table is not displayed

Hoon Park created ZEPPELIN-2691: --- Summary: Setting menu for table is not displayed Key: ZEPPELIN-2691 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2691 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type:

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2436: [ZEPPELIN-2690] fix: should respect helium vis order i...

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2436 Tests failed but irrelevant. ``` Results : Tests in error:

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2433: [ZEPPELIN-2684] Flaky Test: ParagraphActionsIT.testSin...

Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2433 @Leemoonsoo @AhyoungRyu @r-kamath Please help review. I ran this for about 21 times, here is the result of those; 12 passed -

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2423: [ZEPPELIN-2672] Fix interpreter repos url tooltip

Github user necosta commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2423 Yes, @1ambda , expect updates later today. Have a few challenges on the column selector script... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2423: [ZEPPELIN-2672] Fix interpreter repos url tooltip

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2423 Hi, @necosta --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2427: Rinterpreter

Github user 1ambda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2427 @test2016new Could u check that this PR is intentional? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2437: [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter bind...

GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2437 [ZEPPELIN-2582][DOCS] docs for interpreter binding modes ### What is this PR for? Updated `interpreter_binding_mode.md` since users are sometimes confused what this mode means and there

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2436: [ZEPPELIN-2690] fix: should respect helium vis ...

Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2436 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2436: [ZEPPELIN-2690] fix: should respect helium vis ...

GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2436 [ZEPPELIN-2690] fix: should respect helium vis order in result ### What is this PR for? Fixed to respect helium vis order in results. This PR is written based on

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2407: [ZEPPELIN-1907] Shell Interpreter does not renew ticke...

Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2407 IMO, this is just one less hassle. A user whoever configures Zeppelin with this configuration i.e. have a keytab/principal configured and enable "user impersonation", is aware that this