Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2177
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
It's just my opinion. Thus, it's ok to use d3 if you think it's reasonable
ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2212
Tested and works as describe. LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2125
UI can be improved in the following PRs. So it's ok not to resolve the
whole things in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2199
@markito I mean, this PR not the JIRA ticket :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2210
[ZEPPELIN-2088] Evaluate helium bundle one by one
### What is this PR for?
Evaluate helium bundle one by one. Because
- Bundling them in one file is not good idea because
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2252
[ZEPPELIN-1940] lint rule set is NOT applied at all.
### What is this PR for?
eslint ruleset is NOT applied at all due to invalid `.eslintrc`.
This PR includes
- fixes
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2252
@AhyoungRyu Could you help review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2251
One suggestion. What about calling them as 'widget' or something instead of
'type'? cause we might add actual type like 'number', 'string',... as
@leemoonsu mentioned.
---
If your project is set
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2256
Old version zeppelins will not render converted note.json. On the other
hand, if we keep 'result', they can render last version of old format. Is it ok?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1761
Let me create new PR which including only 1 OS (ubuntu) based on this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2260
@soralee Please help review this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2225
Submitted #2261
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2260
[ZEPPELIN-2408] Should use $uibTooltip instead of $tooltip (master)
### What is this PR for?
Since we are using angular-bootstrap 2.5+, we should use `$uibTooltip`
instead of `$tooltip
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2261
[ZEPPELIN-2420] Slow notebook listing in navbar
### What is this PR for?
Notebook listing is slow as you can see in the screenshot below.
The problem was,
- angular
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2259
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2253
@jongyoul ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2261
@tinkoff-dwh Please help review this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1689
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2252
rebased to resolve conflict with #2133
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2540
It makes sense displaying last execution time instead of creation time of
the notebook in the job page.
Tested and works well LGTM.
Let's merge it to master and branch-0.7
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2541
Thanks for the contribution. Could you check the failed job?
- https://travis-ci.org/XuMingmin/zeppelin/jobs/264931044
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2536
Can we apply this patch into branch-0.7 as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2506
I didn't mean both. Just gave an opinion.
Personally, I don't believe that reviewer only can reply `LGTM` or `NO`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2539
Hi, Thanks for the contribution. @sadhen
I think you can manually move `interpreter*.json` inside the docker
container.
Isn't it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2540
@byung-u I missed the CI status/
Could you make sure CI is green?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2506
For me, it's up to you.
- keep current implementation
- try and propose few different UIs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2527
Thanks for the contribution @byamthev I left a comment. Could you check
that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2538
Thanks for the contribution @wishwisdom.
It's unclear in the screenshots because you used the old version of
zeppelin for the `before` screenshot. Could you update it?
---
If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2540
It's weird. https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2541 passed CI and we
modified https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/.travis.yml 21 days ago.
I guess
- the package
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2445
Hi, what is your base branch? Could you rebase using current master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2538
@soralee Thanks for posting the image. LGTM.
Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2540
Some PRs made yesterday passed CI. Could you rebase using current master? I
am not sure what base branch you are using.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4968473/29358997
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2527
LGTM. merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2538
LGTM. Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1151
Closed. Thanks for the reporting.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2503
1. Let's expose the config using REST API we already have.
-
http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/usage/rest_api/configuration.html#configuration-rest-api-list
2. Check
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2506
@tinkoff-dwh Thanks for the update.
In feature and code level, it's good. But personally, I hope we can get
improved UI.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2526
I saw that people were asking there is this kind of permission.
-
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43971836/how-do-i-set-permissions-to-a-zeppelin-note-to-be-able-to-execute
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2528
Thanks for the contribution. Really nice and useful feature.
I guess you introduced new property `isExpanded` in setting. It would be
nice to include newly added the property in existing
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2525
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2503
Then, I think we need to hide when cookie manager is disabled.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2445
Hi @agura I guess you didn't setup travis CI for the forked repository.
- https://builds.apache.org/job/zeppelin-pull-request/2647/console
![image](https://user
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2445
LGTM, merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2543
I think now CI works properly.
Please restart the failed test since it looks like the flaky test
- https://travis-ci.org/byung-u/zeppelin/jobs/265423163
---
If your project
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2543
Checked that CI is green. Merge if no more discussion.
https://travis-ci.org/byung-u/zeppelin/builds/265423161
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2541
LGTM. Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2462
@malayhm Merged to master. Thanks for the contribution again!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2512
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2460
Deployed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2460
and works well in mobile (iphone 6s chrome, sarari)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
@soralee Thanks for the review. We need to keep the zeppelin-web module
clean. :)
Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2458
@ebuildy Thanks for the contribution.
Tested and works well, merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2487
LGTM merge if no more discussion.
referred
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/SQL_Injection_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet#Defense_Option_1:_Prepared_Statements_.28with_Parameterized_Queries.29
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2473
Hi, Thanks for the contribution.
1. Could you make the failed job be green? -
https://travis-ci.org/ebuildy/zeppelin/jobs/251686246
2. Please make a JIRA ticket for this issue
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2475
Thanks for the contribution @yanboliang. I left a comment. Could you check
that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2491
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2491
[ZEPPELIN-2777] Unit test for configuration module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the configuration module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
[ZEPPELIN-2749] Use scalable file structure for zeppelin web
### What is this PR for?
We have improved zeppelin-web, but some parts are still messy. As part of
keeping zeppelin-web
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2477
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2477
[ZEPPELIN-2342] Improving Test Environment for zeppelin-web (e2e, coverage)
### What is this PR for?
Improved testing environment for zeppelin-web
- added `test:watch` command
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2477
[ZEPPELIN-2342] Improving Test Environment for zeppelin-web (e2e, coverage,
..)
### What is this PR for?
Improved testing environment for zeppelin-web
- added `test:watch
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
[ZEPPELIN-2749] Use scalable file structure for zeppelin web
### What is this PR for?
We have improved zeppelin-web, but some parts are still messy. As part of
keeping zeppelin-web
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2446
@necosta
I just built PR 2446 and remove `/conf/helium.json` and then installed 2
packages and reorder the icons,
1. But it takes longer than before. IMO, we just need to save
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
Rebased to clean commit messages.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2493
[ZEPPELIN-2778] Unit test for credential module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the credential module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally, I
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2472
rebased to fix some commit message which can't be handled in the merge
script. (`*`)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2493
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2493
[ZEPPELIN-2778] Unit test for credential module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the credential module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2489
@desmorto thanks for the contribution.
1. Could you create a JIRA ticket?
2. files under `/thrift` are auto-generated, so we can't modify.
3. You need to the forked repository
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2491
[ZEPPELIN-2777] Unit test for configuration module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the configuration module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally, I
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2458
@ebuildy I left a comment. Could u check that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2475
Left a comment, except for it, LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2446
@necosta Tested locally and it works well.
Could you rebase using the current master? since the base branch looks
quite old.
LGTM except for it.
---
If your project is set up
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2478
Thanks for the great feature! since this is a big change, I guess it takes
a time to review and requires multiple reviewers. Let me take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2474
Let create a PR to fix the ASCII issue, we can test this PR based on the
ASCII PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2462
Hi, @malayhm Could you take a look the comment I left? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
Thanks for implementing such a great feature!
1. Could you rebase against the current master? Since filenames were
changes, it would be easier to review after rebasing
2. Regarding UX
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2458
CI is green, I think jenkins was restarted somehow.
- https://travis-ci.org/ebuildy/zeppelin/builds/253975556
LGTM merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2489
@desmorto Then could you close and reopen this PR to retrigger jenkins
again?
https://builds.apache.org/job/zeppelin-pull-request/2363/console
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2500
@sohaibiftikhar Thanks for the contribution!
Travis CI is not set, but this is not relevant with CI.
LGTM. merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2483
Can we write docs to let the user know they can set these options using
maven profile?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user 1ambda reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
[ZEPPELIN-2779] Unit test for job module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the `job` module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2503
I don't have a preference, but in my experience, many web apps rely on the
browser provided remember-me feature. Here is an example of Github sign-in page
- https://github.com/login
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2469
Will be handled later
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user 1ambda closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2469
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2500
Deployed
-
https://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/setup/security/shiro_authentication.html#ldap
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2475
@yanboliang Sorry for the late response.
Thx for the contribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
Thanks for the review @sravan-s
Merge if no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
@tinkoff-dwh Thank you for the update.
1. Can we add the shortcut into
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4968473/28510157-a6b31092-7081-11e7-99e9-1ad9894d9b75
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2326
Hi @vipul1409 , Could you check
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2505?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
@tinkoff-dwh It's the default binding in emacs mode.
## in default modes
https://github.com/ajaxorg/ace/wiki/Default-Keyboard-Shortcuts
![image](https://user
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2503
Thanks. I updated the previous comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
@tinkoff-dwh
1. I realized that `CTRL+F` is bound to `Moving cursor` in paragraphs. Can
we use `CTRL + OPT + F` (`ALT` in case of windows OS) or another key what you
think better
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2462
@malayhm cursor is still thick. Should I missing something? or..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2500
I see. thanks for the answer.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user 1ambda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2497
[ZEPPELIN-2779] Unit test for job module (zeppelin-web)
### What is this PR for?
Added few test cases for the `job` module under `zeppelin-web/`
Additionally,
- removed
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2489
It says `Looks like travis-ci is not configured for your fork.`
If you set already travis CI for your fork, could you provide the link? i
can help u.
---
If your project is set up
601 - 700 of 1201 matches
Mail list logo