[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1647: [ZEPPELIN-1013] Don't run paragraph on selectbox chang...

2016-11-28 Thread Leemoonsoo
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1647
  
Although it changes user experience, it is more consistent behavior 
considering other type of dynamic form behavior (input, checkbox).

Regarding the test, while other types of dynamic forms also don't have 
automated test. I have created 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1720 and we can resolve it 
separately.

LGTM and merge to master if there're no more discussions.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1647: [ZEPPELIN-1013] Don't run paragraph on selectbox chang...

2016-11-27 Thread AhyoungRyu
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1647
  
@Mleekko Thanks for your contribution. 
> Since user can choose to run or not to run. Users do not have an option 
in current implementation.

And agree with @1ambda :)
LGTM 👍 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1647: [ZEPPELIN-1013] Don't run paragraph on selectbox chang...

2016-11-22 Thread 1ambda
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1647
  
@Mleekko 

Thanks for contribution. 

A. CI failure is not related to this PR

```
// https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/176444213/log.txt?deansi=true

17:44:25,594 ERROR org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch:120 - Failed to 
open index dir RAMDirectory@7e1ec70e 
lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.SingleInstanceLockFactory@169ea8d2, make 
sure indexing finished OK
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexNotFoundException: no segments* file found in 
RAMDirectory@7e1ec70e 
lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.SingleInstanceLockFactory@169ea8d2: files: 
[]
at 
org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:726)
at 
org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader.open(StandardDirectoryReader.java:50)
at org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader.open(DirectoryReader.java:63)
at org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch.query(LuceneSearch.java:104)
at 
org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearchTest.canNotSearchBeforeIndexing(LuceneSearchTest.java:147)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:200)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153)
at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
17:44:25,606  INFO org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch:305 - Indexing 2 
notebooks took 7ms
17:44:25,653  INFO org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch:305 - Indexing 2 
notebooks took 5ms
17:44:25,704  INFO org.apache.zeppelin.search.LuceneSearch:305 - Indexing 2 
notebooks took 5ms
```

B. However, making CI green is good usually. Since reviews may not see a 
failed PR because of many PRs

There are 2 ways to trigger CI again

- (clean way) commit --amend and push HEAD --force
- (easy, but not clean way) close PR and reopen

C. Let me review and return some feedbacks. Thanks again :)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---