[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-3029) Create pom.xml for jute and server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16725640#comment-16725640 ] Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-3029: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-3220) The snapshot is not saved to disk and may cause data inconsistency.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16725617#comment-16725617 ] maoling commented on ZOOKEEPER-3220: [~jiangjiafu] FileTxnSnapLog#save {code:java} /**

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

Ok. Looks like ant still works properly, so let’s commit this patch and you guys can collaborate to polish the Maven build. For now, it’s master-only. Thanks, Andor > On 2018. Dec 19., at 16:44, Norbert Kalmar > wrote: > > Thank you Enrico, I agree, that we could commit this patch at it's

[jira] [Assigned] (ZOOKEEPER-3209) New `getEphemerals` api to get all the ephemeral nodes created by the session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dinesh Appavoo reassigned ZOOKEEPER-3209: - Assignee: Dinesh Appavoo > New `getEphemerals` api to get all the ephemeral

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-3216) Make init/sync limit tunable via JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16725345#comment-16725345 ] Jie Huang commented on ZOOKEEPER-3216: -- link to the PR: 

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1736) Zookeeper SASL authentication allows anonymus users to log in

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16725304#comment-16725304 ] Rob commented on ZOOKEEPER-1736: I agree, this should be a bug based upon the original description of

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

Thank you Enrico, I agree, that we could commit this patch at it's current state, it fulfills the original jira anyways. I'll see what's wrong with the java tests, but honestly, it looks like they're just flaky... runs well on local builds with 8 thread. Regards, Norbert On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

Hi All, For assembly task I would promote the way how HBase works. They create a pure source and a bin tarball separately. Please see how they create a release here: https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/master/dev-support/make_rc.sh We could probably use the well known "copy+paste technology" to

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

Great work Norbert I you want I can help,especially for rat, findbugs (need to switch to spotbugs anyway) and OWASP stuff (recently I started using Maven Plugin in other projects) But I am not sure how can I help you concretely if we do not commit your work. We could commit the work as it is now,

[jira] [Resolved] (ZOOKEEPER-3174) Quorum TLS - support reloading trust/key store

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andor Molnar resolved ZOOKEEPER-3174. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.5.5 3.6.0 Issue

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

Hi everyone, Some update on the maven migration: I had a few bumps here and there (just looking at the latest patch Andor linked - https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/708 - you can see on the commits). Current state is that the build works, tests run, but reports like findbugs, clover etc.

Build failed in Jenkins: ZooKeeper-trunk-owasp #210

See -- [...truncated 26.81 KB...] [ivy:retrieve] found org.jsoup#jsoup;1.11.3 in maven2 [ivy:retrieve] found com.sun.mail#mailapi;1.6.1 in maven2 [ivy:retrieve] found

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-3221) WriteLock in recipes may get wrong child name as lock id

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16724814#comment-16724814 ] maoling commented on ZOOKEEPER-3221: Yes,the implements of the WriteLock has some problems,other