[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2604) Temporary node has not been deleted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398179#comment-16398179 ] sunqb commented on ZOOKEEPER-2604: -- this is a bug.i am sure > Temporary node has not been deleted >

ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk8 - Build # 884 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk8/884/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 61.04 KB...] [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0,

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

2018-03-14 12:26 GMT+01:00 Flavio Junqueira : > I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut > a 3.5.4 release? > It will be great ! ZK 3.5.4 has Quorum Peer Mutual Auth which is very important in order to move from 3.4 branch to 3.5 Enrico > >

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

There are 10 open blocker issues marked for 3.5.4. Can I get some help to sort out those issues? https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ZOOKEEPER/versions/12340141 -Flavio > On 14 Mar 2018, at 12:28, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > 2018-03-14 12:26 GMT+01:00 Flavio Junqueira

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398500#comment-16398500 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - hey guys, here are some comments based on

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut a 3.5.4 release? -Flavio > On 7 Dec 2017, at 00:27, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > I haven't forgotten about this - we've been stuck on ZOOKEEPER-2901 . I > think we getting closer but it's been tricky to

ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk8 - Build # 1408 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk8/1408/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 60.39 KB...] [junit] Running

ZooKeeper-trunk - Build # 3766 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/3766/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 142.21 KB...] [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0,

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #488: ZOOKEEPER-2993 - Removed 'generated' line from .gitign...

Github user tamaashu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/488 @asutosh936 Sorry but I don't think that the generated directory is ignored by a defect. We should never add generated files to git, they must be ignored. ---

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2993) .ignore file prevents adding src/java/main/org/apache/jute/compiler/generated dir to git repo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398771#comment-16398771 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2993: --- Github user tamaashu commented on the issue:

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

I would like to cut 3.5.4. Need more eyes on 2901 though. Patrick On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut > a 3.5.4 release? > > -Flavio > > > On 7 Dec 2017, at 00:27, Patrick Hunt

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

Ok, I can have a look at ZK-2901. I'd like to get ZK-2982 in as well as it is causing us problems with Kubernetes. The fix is simple, but I'm wondering about adding a test case. -Flavio > On 14 Mar 2018, at 17:30, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > I would like to cut 3.5.4. Need more

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2993) .ignore file prevents adding src/java/main/org/apache/jute/compiler/generated dir to git repo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16399406#comment-16399406 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2993: --- Github user anmolnar commented on the issue:

[GitHub] zookeeper issue #488: ZOOKEEPER-2993 - Removed 'generated' line from .gitign...

Github user anmolnar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/488 @tamaashu Generally speaking I agree with you, but that directory is somewhat different. There is code in it which we don't generate during our build process, but it's been in git since the