ZooKeeper_branch33_solaris - Build # 594 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch33_solaris/594/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 488 lines...] [junit] 2013-07-22

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13714965#comment-13714965 ] Germán Blanco commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: -- I tried to refresh the proposal

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13714986#comment-13714986 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: - bq. My personal preference

ZooKeeper_branch34_solaris - Build # 596 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_solaris/596/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### Started by timer Building remotely on solaris1 in workspace

ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008 - Build # 944 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/944/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 514 lines...] .\src\cli.c(402): error C2065:

ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris - Build # 619 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris/619/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 127 lines...] [touch] Creating

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715026#comment-13715026 ] Germán Blanco commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: -- I see, trying to make this a bit

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715042#comment-13715042 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: - Right, this is a bit

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715056#comment-13715056 ] Germán Blanco commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: -- Answering myself, I guess the

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715057#comment-13715057 ] Germán Blanco commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: -- Sorry, I forgot to refresh the

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715060#comment-13715060 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: - ;-)

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715069#comment-13715069 ] Germán Blanco commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: -- I am thinking that, giving that

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715077#comment-13715077 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: - I'm not sure why you think

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715089#comment-13715089 ] Germán Blanco commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: -- I would prefer not to touch the

ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008 - Build # 945 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/945/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 516 lines...] .\src\cli.c(402): error C2065:

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715115#comment-13715115 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: - I understand your concern,

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715120#comment-13715120 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: - ... I should have said from

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715130#comment-13715130 ] Germán Blanco commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: -- If I am not wrong, the follower

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715474#comment-13715474 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: - bq. there is actually no

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1732) ZooKeeper server unable to join established ensemble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715514#comment-13715514 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1732: - I was actually thinking

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-654) Bookkeeper client operations are allowed even after its closure, bk#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715527#comment-13715527 ] Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-654: - bq.As my knowledge, all the following

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1730) Make ZooKeeper easier to test - support simulating a session expiration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715524#comment-13715524 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-1730: - Let's do

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1730) Make ZooKeeper easier to test - support simulating a session expiration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jordan Zimmerman updated ZOOKEEPER-1730: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1730-3.patch 1. Updated to block until SendThread

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1735) Make ZooKeeper easier to test - support simulating a connection loss

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715738#comment-13715738 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-1735: - NOTE: this change should

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-1735) Make ZooKeeper easier to test - support simulating a connection loss

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-1735: --- Summary: Make ZooKeeper easier to test - support simulating a connection loss Key: ZOOKEEPER-1735 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1735

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1735) Make ZooKeeper easier to test - support simulating a connection loss

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jordan Zimmerman updated ZOOKEEPER-1735: Description: As part of making ZooKeeper clients more test friendly, it would

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1733) FLETest#testLE is flaky on windows boxes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715822#comment-13715822 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1733: - I haven't had a chance to

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1733) FLETest#testLE is flaky on windows boxes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flavio Junqueira updated ZOOKEEPER-1733: Priority: Major (was: Minor) FLETest#testLE is flaky on windows boxes

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1733) FLETest#testLE is flaky on windows boxes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715883#comment-13715883 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on ZOOKEEPER-1733: -- {bq} I haven't had a chance to

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1730) Make ZooKeeper easier to test - support simulating a session expiration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thawan Kooburat updated ZOOKEEPER-1730: --- Attachment: gitdiff I used to script to convert git patch to svn patch. This

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1730) Make ZooKeeper easier to test - support simulating a session expiration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715958#comment-13715958 ] Thawan Kooburat commented on ZOOKEEPER-1730: Comments: 1. instead of using

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-655) Race between addEntry and deleteLedger causes all further flushes to fail

Vinay created BOOKKEEPER-655: Summary: Race between addEntry and deleteLedger causes all further flushes to fail Key: BOOKKEEPER-655 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-655 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-655) Race between addEntry and deleteLedger causes all further flushes to fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715167#comment-13715167 ] Vinay commented on BOOKKEEPER-655: -- Analysis: --- Sequence is as follows 1.

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-655) Race between addEntry and deleteLedger causes all further flushes to fail

Vinay created BOOKKEEPER-655: Summary: Race between addEntry and deleteLedger causes all further flushes to fail Key: BOOKKEEPER-655 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-655 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-604) Ledger storage can log an exception if GC happens concurrently.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-604: -- Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-604-Ledger-storage-can-log-an-exception-i.patch You're right.

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-607) Filtered Messages Require ACK from Client Causes User Being Throttled Incorrectly Forever

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715317#comment-13715317 ] Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-607: --- Change is good and makes sense. +1.

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-654) Bookkeeper client operations are allowed even after its closure, bk#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rakesh R updated BOOKKEEPER-654: Attachment: 0002-BOOKKEEPER-654.patch Bookkeeper client operations are allowed even after

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-604) Ledger storage can log an exception if GC happens concurrently.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715300#comment-13715300 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-604: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-604 Patch

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-655) Race between addEntry and deleteLedger causes all further flushes to fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinay updated BOOKKEEPER-655: - Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-655.patch Attaching draft patch Race between addEntry and

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-654) Bookkeeper client operations are allowed even after its closure, bk#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715376#comment-13715376 ] Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-654: -- Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-654 Patch

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-607) Filtered Messages Require ACK from Client Causes User Being Throttled Incorrectly Forever

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715387#comment-13715387 ] Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-607: --- Committed revision 1505726 (trunk)

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-655) Race between addEntry and deleteLedger causes all further flushes to fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715435#comment-13715435 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-655: -- this should be addressed by

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-645) Bookkeeper shell command to get a list of readonly bookies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715443#comment-13715443 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-645: -- works for me.

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-654) Bookkeeper client operations are allowed even after its closure, bk#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715462#comment-13715462 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-654: -- We should find why the operations are

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-654) Bookkeeper client operations are allowed even after its closure, bk#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13715518#comment-13715518 ] Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-654: - bq.We should find why the operations are

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-604) Ledger storage can log an exception if GC happens concurrently.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13716006#comment-13716006 ] Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-604: - (timeout=6) option is missing in tests,

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-655) Race between addEntry and deleteLedger causes all further flushes to fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13716033#comment-13716033 ] Vinay commented on BOOKKEEPER-655: -- Yes, Sijie, BOOKKEEPER-604 solves the current

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-654) Bookkeeper client operations are allowed even after its closure, bk#close()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13716056#comment-13716056 ] Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-654: -- {code} @Override public

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-656) Bookie Performance Improvement

Sijie Guo created BOOKKEEPER-656: Summary: Bookie Performance Improvement Key: BOOKKEEPER-656 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-656 Project: Bookkeeper Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-657) Journal Improvement

Sijie Guo created BOOKKEEPER-657: Summary: Journal Improvement Key: BOOKKEEPER-657 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-657 Project: Bookkeeper Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-658) ledger cache refactor

Sijie Guo created BOOKKEEPER-658: Summary: ledger cache refactor Key: BOOKKEEPER-658 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-658 Project: Bookkeeper Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-659) LRU page management in ledger cache.

Sijie Guo created BOOKKEEPER-659: Summary: LRU page management in ledger cache. Key: BOOKKEEPER-659 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-659 Project: Bookkeeper Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-643) Improve concurrency of bookie implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sijie Guo updated BOOKKEEPER-643: - Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug) Parent: BOOKKEEPER-656 Improve concurrency of