Hey Ben, if we have multiple patches in the same jira, perhaps we should use subtasks and name the review requests accordingly? Does it work for the cases you're referring to?I was wondering, though, what other projects do to maintain the jira consistent with respect to discussion on the review
Not only it won't be trivial, but I don't have it completely clear that if we separate Zab and ZooKeeper you will have exactly what you need. In our previous discussions about this issue, we ended up concluding that we would need a richer interface than simply abcast and abdeliver. For example,
Thomas, Did you mean to say Hedwig instead of BookKeeper?
-Flavio
On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi,
I've just had a look at the kafka slides[1] from January HUG. It
seems to me,
that bookkeeper and kafka are quite similar in there problem space.
Is that
so? What are
Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there, build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without it. Is it supposed to be this way?-FlavioOn Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:(the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect)after much
Hi again, I'm sorry for raising yet another point. I also wanted to point out that we have a few jiras marked as blocked not included in the current candidate. ZOOKEEPER-880 is one of them, and Vishal asked us to consider it for 3.3.3. I think that either we conclude that it is not a blocker and
wrote:I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib.On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed ben.r...@gmail.com wrote:i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?ant tar should grab it right?benOn Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo
...@apache.org wrote: Ben/Vishal,Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The Hbase guys had been asking for it.thanksmahadev On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile
why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas?ant tar should grab it right? benOn Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.comwrote: Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there, build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails
+1, everything seems to be fine for me as well.On Feb 25, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote:+1On 25 Feb 2011, at 09:25, Patrick Hunt wrote:+1, looks good to me. Signing is correct, versions seem right, and thetests all pass on my box.PatrickOn Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Benjamin Reed
It would be nice to include BK jiras as well, like 998 and 1001.-FlavioOn Feb 28, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote:Hi all, Since 3.3.3 release is out the door, I am starting this thread tostart discussion for 3.4.0 release.My plan for 3.4 is to include the following features/enhancements
server，all reads，cpu：15%~20%，qps：about 11000，latency： It seems that the asynchronous calls perform even worse than the synchronous calls. On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Hi Qian, If I understand your description correctly, you are using synchronous calls
at 4:11 PM, Flavio Junqueira (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote:BookKeeper as a sequencer- Key: ZOOKEEPER-1009 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1009 Project: ZooKeeper Issue Type: New Feature Components: contrib-bookkeeper Reporter: Flavio Junqueira Assignee: Flavio
, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:I'm sorry for not replying before. I didn't feel that the message wasforme, since it should be pretty obvious that I'm interested in thoseprojects. Here are some
committers:Dhruba Borthakur (Facebook)Flavio Junqueira (Yahoo)Ivan Kelly (Yahoo)Benjamin Reed (Yahoo)Utkarsh Srivastava (Twitter) flaviojunqueiraresearch scientistf...@yahoo-inc.comdirect +34 93-183-8828avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, esphone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
Hi Jeremy, Thanks for reporting. Without logs from the other nodes, it is somewaht difficult to determine more precisely what happened. But, from the logs, it sounds like node #1 (id 215) is the only leading from these two notifications:2672 [WorkerReceiver Thread]
Hi Jiangwen, Good catch. I followed the code and it does sound like this scenario can happen, ignoring how sessions are handled. I checked that a follower takes a snapshot and starts a zookeeper server right after receiving an UPTODATE message. I'm not clear, though, if it is possible for a client
Agreed, thanks for all the effort in putting the site and the infrastructure up, Ben.-FlavioOn Apr 27, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote:Really Nice!!!Thanks a lot Ben on making this happen!thanksmahadevOn Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Benjamin Reed br...@apache.org wrote:i'm happy to
Thomas, Thanks for you comments, it is an intriguing list of points you lay down below and in some sense it highlights the fact that there is still work to be done. I find it sad, though, that you decided to frame it in such a destructive way, picturing ZooKeeper as a proof-of-concept, poorly
Unless I'm not reading it properly, something didn't go well in the
commit of ZOOKEEPER-965. The two last messages from the jenkins server
have this error:
[exec] mv -f .deps/zktest_st-TestClient.Tpo .deps/zktest_st-
TestClient.Po
[exec] make[1]: *** No rule to make target
I have uploaded the slides of our Zab presentation at the 2011 DSN
conference (http://www.dsn.org) here:
http://www.slideshare.net/FlavioJunqueira/zab-dsn2011-8493524
Just in case anyone on the list is interested.
-Flavio
is under a netty package. There's nothing netty
specific about the api, so it should be in the
org.apache.hedwig.client package.
In both BK and HW, context objects are passed around with callbacks.
I don't think this is necessary, but it doesn't bug me too much.
-Ivan
flavio
junqueira
Thomas's
interests and our current goals?
Patrick
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
these changes
have shifted some timing? My main concern is that this might be caused
directly by the patch itself
Patrick
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
this?
thanks
mahadev
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
.
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
will probably be hard to do in maven, as the
lib directory will not exist in the source.
-Ivan
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
I missed initially that the changes are only to the binary packages.
It doesn't sound like we need to call a new vote.
-Flavio
On Dec 6, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
I'm confused now. If you change the candidate files, then we have to
call for a new vote, no?
-Flavio
On Dec 6
Thanks Mahadev;
+1 I am looking forward to hanging out with you guys. I like the
hackday idea where we collaborate on a set of bugs.
-Eugene
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300
be better as I have a
backup here
at
Netflix.
Let's see what the rest of the ZK world says.
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
are interested in participating
remotely.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
I wonder for how many of us in this community would be difficult to
participate in such an event because we are not US-based or are
many hours
away with respect
. It happens.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpj@yahoo-
inc.com wrote:
Thanks for sense of fairness, Pat, it is really kind. I was not
really
looking for blessing, though. I was really wondering instead what
fraction
of the community is able to attend such meetups
On Dec 7, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
Flavio,
You want to send an email to the mailing list (user/dev) to gauge
interest if folks wanted to attend a meetup in Barcelona?
mahadev
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpj@yahoo-
inc.com wrote:
Thanks for sense of fairness
interest if folks wanted to attend a meetup in Barcelona?
mahadev
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Thanks for sense of fairness, Pat, it is really kind. I was not
really
looking for blessing, though. I was really wondering instead what
fraction
/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.1-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
thanks
mahadev
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
Just in case people on this list haven't seen it yet, HDFS-234
(Integration with BookKeeper logging system) has gone in. Great job,
Ivan!
-Flavio
about it.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpj@yahoo-
inc.com
wrote:
Just in case people on this list haven't seen it yet, HDFS-234
(Integration
with BookKeeper logging system) has gone in. Great job, Ivan!
-Flavio
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f
:
* Apache Maven
== Initial Committers ==
Jordan Zimmerman (Netflix, Inc.)
Jay Zarfoss (Netflix, Inc.)
Jerome Boulon (Netflix, Inc.)
It would be good to have more diversity here. I would love to
contribute, but I don't feel I have cycles for now.
-Flavio
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f
master degree.
-- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
=
epoch here?
In my undestanding the lastAcceptedEpoch is the max epoch of a
follower
may have accepted so when the lead have receive a accepted epoch
from the follower it should always make it's own epoch larger than
this one
Thanks .
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
This message is to throw the idea and get a sense of what people
think, especially the ones working closely on it like Alex, about
creating a branch for the reconfiguration work. The rationale for
proposing it is the following. In our experience with Zab last year,
we implemented
this?
thanks
mahadev
--
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
this?
thanks
mahadev
--
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
.
congratulations sijie! thank you for the work you put into bookkeeper.
ben
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
.
-Flavio
flavio
junqueira
senior research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
.
Regards,
Aniruddha.
bookieexception.txt
flavio
junqueira
senior research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301
,
you'll likely find more)
Without this, the app has to pull all the nodes and perform the comparison
at the client end.
Yes, that's true of what's available today.
Patrick
flavio
junqueira
senior research scientist
f...@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th
Sounds like great stuff, Andrei. Do you have a description of the faults you
have injected I can access?
-Flavio
On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
I was unable to find any issues so far. It seems like ZooKeeper does a
great job at
handling network failures.
This tool is
planning to do more of this if you think it's useful.
-- Andrei Savu
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Sounds like great stuff, Andrei. Do you have a description of the faults
you have injected I can access?
-Flavio
On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:14 PM
Folks,
I'm happy to inform that the PMC has voted and Ivan has happily
accepted to become a ZooKeeper PMC member. Welcome aboard, Ivan!
-Flavio
On Sep 4, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Alexander Shraer wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 questions:
- why was it decided not to guarantee any order on the list returned from
getChildren, given that many use-cases require looking on the child with
the smallest id ?
Why not just keep this list in a sorted form on
of their creation ? Wouldn't this be consistent
with the sequential id and also cheap ? or am I missing something
Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Alexander Shraer wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 questions:
- why
on
recovery, and probably there are other implications, but it seems
worthwhile to consider.
Alex
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hi Alex, I believe we currently use a set to hold the children of a znode.
Are you proposing to use a different data structure
+1, looks good to me.
-Flavio
On Sep 17, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
Hi all,
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.4. 50 JIRAs are
addressed in this release. Please take a look at the release notes
for the jira list.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before
disk, or native async IO (not trivially available within the JVM.)
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Aniruddha Laud wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Just to add
Hi Lory_yang, Thanks for asking questions. As I understand your question,
you're asking about leader election, which we call FLE (Fast Leader Election).
The idea is to select one server out of a pool of available servers. Each
server (or peer) will have a QuorumPeer started, so it does allow
sync simply flushes the channel between the leader and the follower that
forwarded the sync operation, so it doesn't go through the full zab pipeline.
Flushing means that all pending updates from the leader to the follower are
received by the time sync completes. Starting a read operation
write which completed before the
sync began. Is this the intention ? If so, how is this achieved
without running agreement on the sync op ?
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
sync simply flushes the channel between the leader
Hi John, I think the problem you're referring to can be illustrated roughly by
the following scenario:
1- Client C1 is your master (let's call it master not to confuse with ZK
leader) and it is performing work happily;
2- Client C2 becomes the master and C1 hasn't received any notification of
write!
Alex
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hi Alex, Because of the following:
1- A follower F processes operations from a client in FIFO order, and say
that a client submits as you say sync + read;
2- A sync will be processed by the leader
sync to L and L returns
it to F, you actually miss my write!
Alex
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Hi Alex, Because of the following:
1- A follower F processes operations from a client in FIFO order, and say
that a client submits as you say
is broken and the client
owning the Ephemeral node drops off, then we don't have liveness (because
this node may not get cleaned up in a timely fashion). However, we still
preserve corectness.
-jc
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
Say that we
too much.
My approach is different in that a timestamp server reserves a bunch of
timestamps up front and proceeds to hand them out as long as it is the
leader. Leader check can be done without hitting disk hopefully.
Thanks!
-jc
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Flavio Junqueira f
, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
I was thinking that you can do a write per timestamp batch, and not per
individual timestamp. In the worst case, a former leader won't use some
timestamps, and I would think it is ok, but it depends on your application.
Also, even if two clients believe they are leaders
, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I checked your message again and the contract is that getFreshTimestamp()
always gets a fresh timestamp (not older than any returned by that method).
One aspect of the contract that is not clear to me: does this freshness
property hold across clients
+1
-Flavio
On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
in case you have a change
+1, I ran the unit tests and verified that:
- I'm able to have a leader elected in a cluster of 3 servers;
- I'm able to have another leader elected when killing and bringing up servers;
- I'm able to run operations against the cluster.
-Flavio
On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
FYI:
http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2012/11/bookkeeper-durability-at-scale/
-Flavio
Consider voting!
-Flavio
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org
Date: December 3, 2012 4:45:34 PM GMT+01:00
To: bookkeeper-u...@zookeeper.apache.org
bookkeeper-u...@zookeeper.apache.org
Subject: Hadoop Summit talks
Reply-To: bookkeeper-u...@zookeeper.apache.org
I'm not really sure why we are getting this exception here in jenkins:
https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk/org.apache.bookkeeper$bookkeeper-server/849/testReport/junit/org.apache.bookkeeper.client/BookieRecoveryTest/ensurePasswordUsedForOldLedgers_2_/
In ZooKeeperUtil.java:86 we
I have created an entry for release 4.2.1 in the system in the case we want to
move small bugs (not blockers) to that release.
-Flavio
Thanks a lot for sharing the results, Thawan. The 100% read value seems pretty
cool, but there is really sharp drop with 1% writes, more than I expected. Is
it because you're using a single disk? Any idea?
-Flavio
On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:30 AM, Thawan Kooburat tha...@fb.com wrote:
Hi folks,
, Thawan Kooburat tha...@fb.com wrote:
In short, I believe is it because write request is blocking the entire
pipeline, so read request cannot go through.
We are planing to work on ZOOKEEPER-1609 to fix this problem
--
Thawan Kooburat
On 1/11/13 1:06 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque
+1, I ran tests, started bookies and a hub, and checked rat, licenses, and
binaries; it looks great to me.
-Flavio
On Jan 14, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote:
This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.2.0.
It fixes the following issues:
Awesome job, Ivan and community! I'm very happy to see this one through.
-Flavio
On Jan 18, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote:
As we have 6 +1s, including the necessary 3 PMC +1s, this vote has
passed. As such, I will push this candidate as the release today and
announce
. but as I explained before, if we have an incrementing
session id for each writer, it is easy to distinguish m4 in b1 and m4 in b2
b3, since they are added by different sessions.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Flavio Junqueira
fpjunque...@yahoo.comwrote:
No, I didn't mean a recovering
The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Uma and he has
accepted. Congratulations and welcome aboard, Uma!
-Flavio
: we will migrate to 4.2 directly rather than going to 4.1.1
release.
CC'd to user list as well.
Regards,
Uma
From: Flavio Junqueira [fpjunque...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 8:31 PM
To: bookkeeper-...@zookeeper.apache.org
Subject
The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Jiannan and he
has accepted. Congratulations and welcome aboard, Jiannan!
-Flavio
+1, I have run tests, rat, and checked the various project root files.
-Flavio
On Feb 19, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote:
This is the first release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version 4.2.1.
This is a bugfix release to address the performance issues caused by
It wouldn't be very nice to allow holes in the sequence of operations of a
client, it would violate session semantics. I'm also wondering about a couple
of things:
- What does QuotaExceedException convey to the application? That the
application client won't ever be able to send operations
I was checking the issues on jira and I realized that we have currently 76
patch available issues. This is a fairly large number and I'd like some help to
get that number down. One way is to split issues among the folks willing to
review patches. It would be great to have committers signing up
Just to make clear, are you guys talking about Curator recipes or the
recipes under src/recipes in the ZooKeeper project? I'm referring to the
code in the package org.apache.zookeeper.recipes, which is under
src/recipes. I'm not referring to Curator recipes.
Let me add some more information. I'm
The Apache ZooKeeper PMC is pleased to announce that we have extended committer
karma to Thawan and he has accepted.
Congratulations, Thawan!
- The Apache ZooKeeper PMC
The Apache ZooKeeper PMC is pleased to announce that we have invited Michi to
join the PMC and he has accepted.
Congratulations, Michi!
- The Apache ZooKeeper PMC
Hi Nikita,
The only issue I could find has been resolved already:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-992
Are you trying to make trunk work or some earlier version? Also, if you know
how to fix it, I'd encourage you to provide a patch. I can work with you if you
need help.
-WinVS2008 - Build # 847 - Still Failing letters
from Jenkins in this list.
2013/5/31 Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com
Hi Nikita,
The only issue I could find has been resolved already:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-992
Are you trying to make trunk work
I think this discussion has been triggered by a discussion we have had for
ZOOKEEPER-1413. In the patch Thawan proposed there, there was a method reads
txn logs and it simply logs an error in the case of an exception while reading
the log. I raised the question of whether we should do more than
I have updated the credits page with the new additions, let me know if
something is not right, please.
-Flavio
cases, but I don't see how it covers the case above. I
think it doesn't, right?
-Flavio
--
Thawan Kooburat
On 6/1/13 8:18 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think this discussion has been triggered by a discussion we have had
for ZOOKEEPER-1413
http://zookeeper.apache.org/credits.html
There is a link on the main project page. Thanks for checking.
-Flavio
On Jun 3, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Edward Ribeiro edward.ribe...@gmail.com wrote:
Link? :)
Edward
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.comwrote:
I
digests is possibly expensive, so we might need to look at ways to
avoid the performance penalty, like caching txns in memory.
One more comment below:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Thawan Kooburat tha...@fb.com wrote:
On 6/3/13 9:54 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2013
I think our plan for to 2016 is to have zookeeper coordinating spaceships and
before that zookeeper version 3.8.1 will be the first open source software to
land on the moon.
Now seriously, I don't think we have a plan that far ahead, and I'm not aware
of private roadmaps. Some companies using
Sergey proposed a few approaches. Could you tells me how you implement it,
Thawan, please?
-Flavio
On Jul 8, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Thawan Kooburat tha...@fb.com wrote:
I have this functionality in our internal branch.
I can post the patch but it is likely to conflict with ZOOKEEPER-1346, so
I'm not against having ZK-1147 in, but I'm not sure why that's a blocker.
ZK-1549 is a blocker for me, and there are other 5 currently marked as
blockers:
Bug ZOOKEEPER-1667 Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client
reestablish to a server
Bug ZOOKEEPER-1551 Observer ignore
I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM for 3.5.0 if
you want to do 3.4.6.
-Flavio
On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it was
pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty
or should Flavio try his hand at doing
a release?
Patrick
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
Hopefully today/tomm.
thanks
mahadev
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio
.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Flavio Junqueira
fpjunque...@yahoo.comwrote:
The synchronization phase is part of the protocol and we use it to
guarantee that we expose a consistent view of the state. During the
synchronization phase, servers do not accept requests.
Which behavior
I need to also mention ZOOKEEPER-1549 in the context of point (2) below. That's
a blocker for 3.5.0.
-Flavio
On Jul 17, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com wrote:
Moving the discussion to dev but keeping user on CC.
Let's step back. The reason why we started
Hi Neha,
Your proposal seems fine to me. When we close a session in
PrepRequestProcessor, we line up all ephemerals of the session to be deleted,
so as long as the create comes after those deletes, I don't see a problem with
checking if the session is closing. Do you want to create a jira so
it, then it would be good to
check.
-Flavio
On Aug 3, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Neha,
Your proposal seems fine to me. When we close a session in
PrepRequestProcessor, we line up all ephemerals of the session to be deleted,
so as long as the create comes after
1 - 100 of 3022 matches
Mail list logo
