On Feb 6, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Here are the three compilation errors (first one from each file
with an
error). The Unicode and ec-iwona errors were mentioned before, so
I'm
skipping them here. svn says who contributed the test files.
Taco, do
Hi Sanjoy,
I'm really sorry, there is a typo in line 319 of enco-agr.tex.
Correct greeldasiavaria to greekdasiavaria, and you should be in
business...
I'm afraid your document doesn't compile at all with my version of
ConTeXt
ConTeXt ver: 2007.01.23 13:32 MKII fmt: 2007.2.6 int:
Hi all,
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:46:06 +, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Correction: looks OK in xpdf, looks bad in kpdf.
Same here: fine in xpdf, bad in kpdf. Also it's fine in gs 8.50. I'm
using Ubuntu/i386 with pdftex 1.40 and the Debian context packages (so
2007.01.23).
I'm completely new
Hi all!
On Die, 06 Feb 2007, Mike Bird wrote:
I still don't know what or where the bug is but I think
we're narrowing down the possibilities. Thank you all.
One more comment: Acrobat 7 (the full one) does not complain at all,
does not show any strange effects (with all the zoom levels). I
Hi,
Concerning the lm rendering problems ... Jacko would like to have a
report on this so that they can take it into account. Similar problems
could occur with the tex-gyre fonts.
Hans
--
-
Hi Boguslaw!
Here a short report: The following file:
\starttext
\S1
\blank[big]
\S2\crlf\S3
\stoptext
compiled with current context uses the lmmath fonts:
$ pdffonts test.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
Hi Jacko!
On Mit, 07 Feb 2007, Boguslaw Jackowski wrote:
I'd be glad if I could have also the screen shots, unless preparing them
is too cumbersome and time-consuming for you.
Here are 4 images:
xpdf-kpdf-100.png
xpdf-kpdf-125.png
xpdf-kpdf-150.png
Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Jacko!
On Mit, 07 Feb 2007, Boguslaw Jackowski wrote:
I'd be glad if I could have also the screen shots, unless preparing them
is too cumbersome and time-consuming for you.
Here are 4 images:
xpdf-kpdf-100.png
xpdf-kpdf-125.png
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 10:27, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Did anybody send a bug report to the kpdf maintainers yet? This looks
suspiciously like a bug (aka optimization) in kpdf.
xpdf -t1lib no test.pdf gives the same display errors as kpdf, so
kpdf is ruled out.
I'm out of my depth here but
Hi,
Here a short report: The following file:
Thank you for the concise note.
I'd be glad if I could have also the screen shots, unless preparing them
is too cumbersome and time-consuming for you.
Cheers -- Jacko
--
BOP s. c.
ul. Bora-Komorowskiego 24, 80-377 Gdansk, Poland
tel. (+48 58)
10 matches
Mail list logo
