On 10/23/2017 10:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 10/23/2017 09:53 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/23/2017 8:40 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
to the new content in beta 2017.10.19 13:50:
Marked= lpdf.majorversion == 1 and pdfboolean(true) or nil,
for now change that to
On 10/23/2017 11:14 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
Am 23.10.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 10/23/2017 7:01 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Hans,
according to Boris Doubrov (one of the developers of the veraPDF parser
for PDF/A
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> Well, for me it means that all that validation esp of keys like this are
> rather useless (creating work) because docs validated in the past and
> archived now are suddenly no longer valid.
Hm I have made a pdf with
Am 24.10.2017 um 09:15 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 10/23/2017 11:14 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>> Am 23.10.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Hans Hagen:
>>> On 10/23/2017 7:01 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> Hans,
>
> according to Boris
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>
> Yes. My guess (as I have no ISO documention) at that time was, that the
> number should be increased with the versions. I couldn't imagine, why
> the should use a number in that flag (there may be reasons for it, but I
>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>>
>> Yes. My guess (as I have no ISO documention) at that time was, that the
>> number should be increased with the versions. I couldn't
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
> infact
> $ convert cow-brown.pdf --flatten -density 300 cow-brown.png
>
>
> %% unrgb.tex
> \nopdfcompression
>
Am 24.10.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Peter Rolf:
> Am 24.10.2017 um 09:15 schrieb Hans Hagen:
>> On 10/23/2017 11:14 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>>> Am 23.10.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 10/23/2017 7:01 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Pablo Rodriguez
On 10/24/2017 09:49 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>> Well, for me it means that all that validation esp of keys like this are
>> rather useless (creating work) because docs validated in the past and
>> archived now are suddenly no longer valid.
>
On 10/24/2017 07:51 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> But replacing vectors with bitmaps is a way of avoiding the issue, not
>> of fixing it (if this needs to be fixed).
>
> yes, it's a clean way to resolve a problem that could not be
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 07:06 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
>> a pdf ?
>> As said previously , including pdf can break the rules of
>> format=PDF/A-3a.
>> Simply include bitmap images, it's way more robust.
>
> Allow me a fair and respectful
On 10/24/2017 07:06 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
> a pdf ?
> As said previously , including pdf can break the rules of
> format=PDF/A-3a.
> Simply include bitmap images, it's way more robust.
Allow me a fair and respectful disagreement, Luigi.
Bitmap images are less problematic in PDF/A because they
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:06:51 +0200
luigi scarso wrote:
> is this
> \externalfigure[cow]
> a pdf ?
> As said previously , including pdf can break the rules of
> format=PDF/A-3a.
> Simply include bitmap images, it's way more robust.
Isn't that non-optimal, using
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 01:48 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>> [...]
>> Well, the good news is that the actual problem does not effect any A1
>> documents. And even with an incomplete (99.9%) validity the documents
>> stay usable. I'm sure
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:46:21 +0200
luigi scarso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Alan Braslau
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:06:51 +0200
> > luigi scarso wrote:
> >
> >> is this
> >>
On 10/24/2017 01:48 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> [...]
> Well, the good news is that the actual problem does not effect any A1
> documents. And even with an incomplete (99.9%) validity the documents
> stay usable. I'm sure that (alien) historians will love any ConTeXt
> created PDF/A document :D
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:06:51 +0200
> luigi scarso wrote:
>
>> is this
>> \externalfigure[cow]
>> a pdf ?
>> As said previously , including pdf can break the rules of
>> format=PDF/A-3a.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:
> "Let the buyer beware".
>
> Given that bitmap graphics are NOT OK (think bloat, an MS/Office
> specialty), there must be a better solution. Perhaps simply detecting a
> conflict between an included PDF and the "host"
On 10/24/2017 09:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 10/24/2017 8:21 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> It adds them a color space that (I think) makes it impossible that an
>> icc profile can be referred to the form xobject.
>
> Are you sure? The image is included as is. Nothing is added to its
> resource
On 10/24/2017 8:21 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:46:21 +0200
luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Alan Braslau
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:06:51 +0200
luigi scarso wrote:
is
Am 24.10.2017 um 19:51 schrieb luigi scarso:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> On 10/24/2017 07:06 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
>>> a pdf ?
>>> As said previously , including pdf can break the rules of
>>> format=PDF/A-3a.
>>> Simply include bitmap images, it's
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> I will investigate the issue myself and report here (or in the user
> list) the results.
this is the right list
--
luigi
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
22 matches
Mail list logo