Hi,
On 10/06/2010 12:50 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Taco, once you are back to this ... the repository works much better
now, but ConTeXt doesn't. I thought at first that
/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmfcnf.lua
was not adapted yet, but then I figured out that I have
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:58, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Fr, 08 Okt 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
right? (there *is* the weirdness that for texlive, the texmfcnf.lua
lives in the 'luatex' package, not in 'context', but that is just
a minor packaging issue).
I think we
On 10/08/2010 10:58 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 08 Okt 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
right? (there *is* the weirdness that for texlive, the texmfcnf.lua
lives in the 'luatex' package, not in 'context', but that is just
a minor packaging issue).
I think we discussed that at that time, and
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:58:31PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 08 Okt 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
right? (there *is* the weirdness that for texlive, the texmfcnf.lua
lives in the 'luatex' package, not in 'context', but that is just
a minor packaging issue).
I think we discussed
This is sorted out now, or at least it is not really my problem,
right? (there *is* the weirdness that for texlive, the texmfcnf.lua
lives in the 'luatex' package, not in 'context', but that is just
a minor packaging issue).
What other macro packages use texmfcnf.lua? Does LuaLaTeX use it?
On 8-10-2010 11:59, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
This is sorted out now, or at least it is not really my problem,
right? (there *is* the weirdness that for texlive, the texmfcnf.lua
lives in the 'luatex' package, not in 'context', but that is just
a minor packaging issue).
What other macro
