Am 28.05.2012 um 16:40 schrieb Marco:
On 2012-05-23 Marco net...@lavabit.com wrote:
I improved the code. There is no interference any more and no
strange offsets. One thing is still unsolved:
The top/bottom/…rulethickness settings are not inherited from
rulethickness (see the table
On Mon, 28 May 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 28.05.2012 um 16:40 schrieb Marco:
On 2012-05-23 Marco net...@lavabit.com wrote:
I improved the code. There is no interference any more and no
strange offsets. One thing is still unsolved:
The top/bottom/…rulethickness settings are not
Am 28.05.2012 um 17:08 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Mon, 28 May 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 28.05.2012 um 16:40 schrieb Marco:
On 2012-05-23 Marco net...@lavabit.com wrote:
I improved the code. There is no interference any more and no
strange offsets. One thing is still
On Mon, 28 May 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I made also a few modifications on Marcos code, maybe a few of them should be
moved to the core.
It would be also a good idea to change the name of the module to
meta-imp-frame.mkiv or something similar.
In that case, we also need to change
On 28-5-2012 18:09, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I made also a few modifications on Marcos code, maybe a few of them
should be moved to the core.
It would be also a good idea to change the name of the module to
meta-imp-frame.mkiv or something similar.
On 28-5-2012 18:01, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 28.05.2012 um 17:08 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Mon, 28 May 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 28.05.2012 um 16:40 schrieb Marco:
On 2012-05-23 Marconet...@lavabit.com wrote:
I improved the code. There is no interference any more and no
On 28-5-2012 16:48, Marco wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about \doframedparentparameter from pack-rul.mkiv:
\def\doframedparentparameter#1#2{\ifx#1\relax\doframedrootparameter#2\else\doframedparameter#1{#2}\fi}
When the else branch is taken, it picks up the second argument, but
when the if
On 2012-05-28 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
\def\doframedparentparameter#1#2{\ifx#1\relax\doframedrootparameter#2\else\doframedparameter#1{#2}\fi}
normally #1 is a \cs and helpers like \doframedparentparameter are not
user commands
I was talking about the second argument #2. If #2 is
Original Message
Subject: Re: Definition of \doframedparentparameter
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 19:38:27 +0200
From: Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
To: Marco net...@lavabit.com
On 28-5-2012 19:30, Marco wrote:
On 2012-05-28 Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Hi,
\unexpanded\def\strc_notations_command#1%
{\begingroup
\edef\currentnote{#1}%
\strc_constructions_initialize{#1}%
\strc_notes_synchronize
-
\strc_counters_increment_sub\currentconstructionnumber\currentconstructionlevel
+
Dear Hans,
Why are different binary files
tex/context/base/context-version.pdf
tex/context/base/context-version.png
needed for each new version of ConTeXt?
Mojca
___
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
Hi Mojca,
Why are different binary files
tex/context/base/context-version.pdf
tex/context/base/context-version.png
needed for each new version of ConTeXt?
because the graphic changes and is actually a graphics timestamp (i have
it as an icon ... you're the first to notice that it
12 matches
Mail list logo
