Because of
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectifications_orthographiques_du_français_en_1990
:
--- lang-txt.lua~ 2014-06-04 22:39:45.0 +0200
+++ lang-txt.lua2014-07-22 16:44:02.190189134 +0200
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@
en=August,
es=agosto,
fi=elokuu,
-fr=août,
+
No, this is incorrect.
Please maintain août and do not cede to any pseudo-reforms, or use
wikipedia as an authoritative reference...
Thank you
Alan
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:48:37 +0200
Peter Münster pmli...@free.fr wrote:
Because of
On Tue, Jul 22 2014, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Please maintain août and do not cede to any pseudo-reforms,
Hi Alan,
Why pseudo-reform?
or use wikipedia as an authoritative reference...
Sorry, this is probably more authoritative:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:50:33 +0200
Peter Münster pmli...@free.fr wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22 2014, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Please maintain août and do not cede to any pseudo-reforms,
Hi Alan,
Why pseudo-reform?
About as elegant as ped X-ing. In fact, we could suppress all
accentuated
On Tue, Jul 22 2014, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Which gives acceptable alternative-spellings, and says that the
circumflex is not mandatory. It does not suggest that août is
incorrect. Furthermore, août remains the reference.
All right, thanks for the informations.
(if aout is wrong, then
