Hi Mark, I'm really down on browser-only password managers. A
browser-only password manager is of limited use if it cannot be used to
by standalone apps on mobile devices. Like ckarlof said in the
referenced bug, password managers are useful when they can be used
*everywhere* the users go. On
- Original Message -
If our solution had deep OS level integration and is usable by any app,
like Keychain or Lastpass, then yes, that's awesome and you can ignore
me. Otherwise, meh.
I'm talking about OS integration (as much as the OS would allow and shooting
for parity with other
As soon as I hit send, I realized my message was very negative and not
as constructive as I wanted it to be.
I think any exploration into making password managers better is a step
in the right direction, those explorations can be used to iterate and
improve authentication not only for the
Music to my ears.
then yes, that's awesome and you can ignore me.
Thanks for the clarification,
Shane
On 16/10/2014 12:05, Mark Finkle wrote:
If our solution had deep OS level integration and is usable by any
On 04/10/2014 02:54, Ryan Feeley wrote:
As its a hash of your master password, it's safe to increment your
master password by one as an exception.
Here's an argument against this idea from Square:
https://diogomonica.com/posts/password-security-why-the-horse-battery-staple-is-not-correct/
forget), then hashes
the results with a host (such as github.com), and your settings for
that host. If you enter the same inputs on another computer, 1SP will
yield the same password.
If you're referring to the Password Playground in general, we're
addressing his primary concern which is how
characters requirement.
Even if worst case scenario, people reused their Password Playground
generated PW elsewhere, at least that reused PW is stronger than what
they were using previously.
There's already been a lot of studies that a majority of people use
dictionary words and other easily
mobile edition
Product Designer, Identity
Mozilla UX
IRC: rfeeley
On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Chris Karlof ckar...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Ryan Feeley rfee...@mozilla.com wrote:
I showed the password playground to a friend (and xoogler) yesterday who
On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Chris Karlof ckar...@mozilla.com
mailto:ckar...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Ryan Feeley rfee...@mozilla.com
mailto:rfee...@mozilla.com wrote:
I showed the password playground to a friend (and xoogler) yesterday
who was strongly opposed to us
Since I’ve already got the prototype coded up (sloppily), I’d like to start
porting it to FxA and making Ryan’s suggested tweaks. I think we’re a bit
blocked by feature toggles, but might as well get the ball rolling.
John Gruen
Cloud Services UX
jgr...@mozilla.com
irc: jgruen
On Oct 15,
I'm not suggesting you stop with the prototype, but I am pushing Mozilla to add
this kind of feature to Firefox itself, and allow all websites to have access
to stronger password generation, saved to Firefox's password manager and sync'd
across devices. We are already behind:
On Oct 1, 2014, at 3:11 PM, Ryan Feeley rfee...@mozilla.com wrote:
Katie, we’d also like to track impressions and click-thrus. How many people
take advantage of a tool that helps them make a better password when it’s
available? (you might see where we’re doing with this).
When the time
I showed the password playground to a friend (and xoogler) yesterday who was
strongly opposed to us deploying this on anything but one site (e.g. we should
not make this available for other sites to use as a service on the web). If
sites starting linking to the playground from their password
To clarify: are we talking about generating mnemonics like in the
playground in a menu item?
- Greg
On 10/3/14, 10:22 AM, Ryan Feeley wrote:
I showed the password playground to a friend (and xoogler) yesterday who
was strongly opposed to us deploying this on anything but one site (e.g.
we
On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Ryan Feeley rfee...@mozilla.com wrote:
I showed the password playground to a friend (and xoogler) yesterday who was
strongly opposed to us deploying this on anything but one site (e.g. we
should not make this available for other sites to use as a service
Here’s the prototype I built for intern Greg this summer:
http://people.mozilla.org/~jgruen/passwords/mnemonic/#mn-two
Ryan, your mockup shows color changing letters in a textarea, whereas my
prototype uses a second div to highlight first chars of each substring. Off
the top of my head, IDK
On Oct 2, 2014, at 8:28 AM, jgruen jgr...@mozilla.com wrote:
Here’s the prototype I built for intern Greg this summer:
http://people.mozilla.org/~jgruen/passwords/mnemonic/#mn-two
Ryan, your mockup shows color changing letters in a textarea, whereas my
prototype uses a second div to
Nick and Shane, also.
I’m thinking something very quick and dirty here. Maybe something we can
enable/disable with a feature toggle, or only show to a small number of users
to start.
-chris
On Oct 1, 2014, at 3:11 PM, Ryan Feeley rfee...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi all,
I had a chat with
18 matches
Mail list logo
