(Please reply to dev.tree-management)
Until now, the requirements for a new platform/test-suite to be shown in
the default TBPL view have been scattered across many newsgroup
discussions, bugs IRC conversations, which understandably leads to
surprise when developers working on bringing a new
Why does getter_AddRefsT have an operator nsISupports**? So far most
of the uses I've found appear to be people enumerating an
nsISimpleEnumerator directly into an nsCOMPtrT type, although the
documented idl return value is nsISupports. Is this an acceptable paradigm?
--
Warning: May contain
This is awesome, thanks for writing this up, it's made me spot one more
place where Jetpack is failing.
Can we get some more definition around Runs on all trees that merge
into mozilla-central? In particular I want to make that true for
Jetpack but I don't know what all those trees are.
On 3/26/2013 12:07 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
This is awesome, thanks for writing this up, it's made me spot one
more place where Jetpack is failing.
Can we get some more definition around Runs on all trees that merge
into mozilla-central? In particular I want to make that true for
Jetpack but
On 3/26/2013 10:16 AM, Neil wrote:
Why does getter_AddRefsT have an operator nsISupports**? So far most
of the uses I've found appear to be people enumerating an
nsISimpleEnumerator directly into an nsCOMPtrT type, although the
documented idl return value is nsISupports. Is this an acceptable
On 03/26/13 12:17 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 3/26/2013 12:07 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
This is awesome, thanks for writing this up, it's made me spot one
more place where Jetpack is failing.
Can we get some more definition around Runs on all trees that merge
into mozilla-central? In
On 3/26/2013 9:17 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 3/26/2013 12:07 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
This is awesome, thanks for writing this up, it's made me spot one
more place where Jetpack is failing.
Can we get some more definition around Runs on all trees that merge
into mozilla-central? In
On 3/26/2013 12:07 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
This is awesome, thanks for writing this up, it's made me spot one more
place where Jetpack is failing.
Can we get some more definition around Runs on all trees that merge
into mozilla-central? In particular I want to make that true for
Jetpack but I
On 03/26/13 12:20 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 3/26/2013 9:17 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 3/26/2013 12:07 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
This is awesome, thanks for writing this up, it's made me spot one
more place where Jetpack is failing.
Can we get some more definition around Runs on all
I've replied to the last few posts on dev.tree-management :-)
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tree-management
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mozilla.dev.tree-management/N8xmYtgVp74/discussion
On 3/26/2013 7:10 AM, Ed Morley wrote:
(Please reply to dev.tree-management)
10 matches
Mail list logo