On 1/17/2014 4:24 PM, Terrence Cole wrote:
Exact stack rooting is now enabled by default on desktop builds of firefox.
Does this mean that the moving GC is also enabled, or is that a later step?
If we see an increase in the crash rate for nightly builds, is it likely
that they will share a
On 01/18/2014 07:08 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 1/17/2014 4:24 PM, Terrence Cole wrote:
Exact stack rooting is now enabled by default on desktop builds of
firefox.
Does this mean that the moving GC is also enabled, or is that a later step?
No, moving GC is a later step. We are targeting
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anybody think of other similar techniques which we can adopt to improve
our story here? Suggestions on WebIDL annotations, code changes,
documentation, etc. are much appreciated!
If they implement and expose
- Original Message -
Great question! We have a tool called GC zeal in builds with
--enable-gc-zeal and in all debug builds unconditionally. It adds a
small runtime overhead, but gives us fine-grained control over when GC's
happen and adds several verification modes for debugging
Hello,
What does it mean to be a Preferred Reviewer (previously called a
peer) in a Toolkit sub-module[1] and not be on the list of Toolkit
Peers[2]? The Toolkit Code Review page[3] doesn't seem to cover this case.
Specifically:
1) Can a Preferred Reviewer review code in the related
On 01/18/2014 08:51 PM, Matthew N. wrote:
Hello,
What does it mean to be a Preferred Reviewer (previously called a
peer) in a Toolkit sub-module[1] and not be on the list of Toolkit
Peers[2]? The Toolkit Code Review page[3] doesn't seem to cover this case.
Specifically:
1) Can a Preferred
6 matches
Mail list logo