On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:23 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
W3C recently published the following proposed edited recommendations
(the stage before W3C's final stage, Recommendation, but to revise
an existing recommendation, and thus also simultaneously like a last
call) related to
L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday 2014-03-07 01:32 +, Neil wrote:
I noticed a couple of places that queried for a concrete class which didn't
have its own IID, which means that you end up querying for the base interface
instead.
Does the solution we use for do_QueryFrame work here
On Feb 23, 2014, at 5:17 PM, evacc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2013 8:54:24 AM UTC-6, tric...@accusoft.com wrote:
- I suppose that the final lossless step used for JPEGs was the usual
Huffman encoding and not arithmetic coding, have you considered testing the
later one
On 3/6/2014 4:05 PM, Benoit Girard wrote:
Thanks for doing this.
However I feel like our options for code that need preferences off the main
thread are a bit poor.
Yes. This is mostly intentional, because it's unusual to actually have
user preferences affect threaded code behavior in ways that
On 2014-02-28 17:24 , Hal Wine wrote:
tl;dr: what is the balance point between pushes to try taking too long
and loosing repository history of recent try pushes?
Based on the responses to this specific question, we'll go back to
waiting for developers to notify IT when there is enough
5 matches
Mail list logo
