Dear Steve,
Thank you for the feedback.
Also I would like to thank other people whose e-mails
also give an glimpse of the depth of the problem.
On 2014/10/03 4:49, Steve Fink wrote:
On 10/02/2014 11:59 AM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at a large number of JavaScript (strict)
On 3/10/14 01:11, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Jonathan Kew jfkth...@gmail.com wrote:
Or do people need to hardcode
UA versions to know what UAs support it?
I believe that's what Google Fonts currently does, though IMO a better
approach is to serve CSS that offers
I'm in the process of doing that for uncaught rejections, fwiw.
On 03/10/14 03:34, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/2/14, 4:53 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
If you want to guarantee it, don't warn, assert.
Note that mochitest-plain tests will go orange on unexpected uncaught
exceptions. Not least
Hi,
I am trying to write a C++ unit test for code that runs in child
process, but all c++ tests I found run in parent process. Is it possible
to write a c++ test case that runs in child process, or is there any
example in our code?
Thanks,
Patrick
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
FYI, forwarding Ehsan’s reply:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: JavaScript (strict) Warning from FF mochitest-plain test.
Date: 2 Oct 2014 23:09:29 GMT+2
To: Mike de Boer mdeb...@mozilla.com
Great! I'm all for this if we decide to act on
On 10/3/2014 4:59 AM, Patrick Wang wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to write a C++ unit test for code that runs in child
process, but all c++ tests I found run in parent process. Is it possible
to write a c++ test case that runs in child process, or is there any
example in our code?
Could you be more
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.us wrote:
On 10/3/2014 4:59 AM, Patrick Wang wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to write a C++ unit test for code that runs in child
process, but all c++ tests I found run in parent process. Is it possible
to write a c++ test case
The test I am writing is to test an implementation of WebRTC's TCP
socket in content process. These codes are build on top of TCPSocket's
IPDL in C++ and don't have IDL so it cannot be called directly from JS,
and the tests for chrome process version are written with gtest.
Therefore I am thinking
On 10/3/2014 9:46 AM, Patrick Wang wrote:
The test I am writing is to test an implementation of WebRTC's TCP
socket in content process. These codes are build on top of TCPSocket's
IPDL in C++ and don't have IDL so it cannot be called directly from JS,
and the tests for chrome process version
Sadly, the WebRTC gtest-based ones (e.g., media/webrtc/signaling/test) do.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.us
wrote:
On 10/3/2014 4:59 AM, Patrick Wang wrote:
Hi,
I am trying
Hi,
It seems that many useful C++11 features supported since GCC 4.5 is not
allowed, including lambdas and local structs as template parameters.
I found that both Linux build and Android build have been using GCC 4.7 for
a time, and after searching the bugzilla with keyword gcc 4.5, 4.6, 4.7,
- Original Message -
I found that both Linux build and Android build have been using GCC 4.7 for
a time, and after searching the bugzilla with keyword gcc 4.5, 4.6, 4.7,
4.8, I found no open tracking bugs about upgrading the version of GCC we
use from a version older than 4.5. From the
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Nathan Froyd froy...@mozilla.com wrote:
- Original Message -
I found that both Linux build and Android build have been using GCC 4.7
for
a time, and after searching the bugzilla with keyword gcc 4.5, 4.6, 4.7,
4.8, I found no open tracking bugs
On Friday, 3 October 2014 02:12:22 UTC+2, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Could we at least add woff2 to the Accept header when fetching fonts?
If Internet Media Types for fonts were widely and consistently deployed, then
that sort of server-mediated content negotiation (client sends list of accepted
14 matches
Mail list logo
