Re: SpiderMonkey and XPConnect style changing from |T *p| to |T* p|

2015-03-30 Thread Chris Peterson
On 3/29/15 3:35 PM, smaug wrote: Having the one commit in the blame doesn't really matter. Often one needs to go to the first commit of the code anyway. Is there an hg or git equivalent to Perforce's Time-Lapse View tool? It shows a global view of a file's blame history and you can visually

Re: SpiderMonkey and XPConnect style changing from |T *p| to |T* p|

2015-03-30 Thread Bobby Holley
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Chris Peterson cpeter...@mozilla.com wrote: On 3/29/15 3:35 PM, smaug wrote: Having the one commit in the blame doesn't really matter. Often one needs to go to the first commit of the code anyway. Is there an hg or git equivalent to Perforce's Time-Lapse

Re: DOM Bug Triage Meeting

2015-03-30 Thread Anthony Hughes
Since I've only had one response I'll assume interest in a DOM triage meeting is pretty low. As such I don't think there will be much interest in a strictly scheduled meeting and will instead be doing triage sporadically on my own. Please email me back if you'd like to join me so that I can

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 31 mars 2015 à 07:43, James Graham ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk a écrit : There is also a view with some extra comments at [1] which are worth reading. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/view# And to not forget the title, if people missed the

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail to achieve acceptable performance on mobile: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub One

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread James Graham
On 30/03/15 22:49, Robert O'Callahan wrote: This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail to achieve acceptable performance on mobile: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub There is also a view with some extra comments

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread James Graham
On 30/03/15 23:55, Karl Dubost wrote: Le 31 mars 2015 à 07:43, James Graham ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk a écrit : There is also a view with some extra comments at [1] which are worth reading. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/view# And to

Re: Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 31 mars 2015 à 08:14, James Graham ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk a écrit : If you just mean that the specifics of this analysis have all been done in Blink then yes, That's all. That was context. very general lessons in there about the perf-destroying things that authors do, which provides an

Some site performance analysis from Google

2015-03-30 Thread Robert O'Callahan
This is a quick read and an interesting analysis of how various sites fail to achieve acceptable performance on mobile: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K-mKOqiUiSjgZTEscBLjtjd6E67oiK8H2ztOiq5tigk/pub Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo owoiotoho oao

Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Scroll Snapping on Desktop

2015-03-30 Thread Tantek Çelik
From the bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1138658 This will be on by default in 39 right? Do we have any nice example pages to show it off? Being able to use CSS Snap Points has also come up in recent #indiewebcamp discussions, so FWIW, there are also independent web developers

Re: SpiderMonkey and XPConnect style changing from |T *p| to |T* p|

2015-03-30 Thread 陳侃如
Bobby Holley bobbyhol...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Chris Peterson cpeter...@mozilla.com wrote: On 3/29/15 3:35 PM, smaug wrote: Having the one commit in the blame doesn't really matter. Often one needs to go to the first commit of the code anyway. Is there an

[meta] Intent to implement - captured some docs on wikimo

2015-03-30 Thread Tantek Çelik
Having followed the Intent to implement emails for a while, and noticing that there was already an email template for it on wikimo: https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/ExposureGuidelines#Intent_to_Implement I went ahead and wrote up a page about this practice, along with links to Blink/MS

Re: Suggest to mark crashtest for assertions debug build only

2015-03-30 Thread Bobby Holley
Crashtests are a very low proportion of our overall automation burden. We also gain something from running a tricky situation in as many different configurations (opt and debug) as possible, since we may catch bugs other than the one we had in mind when writing the crashtest. So I think we should

Suggest to mark crashtest for assertions debug build only

2015-03-30 Thread Xidorn Quan
It seems we generally add crashtests even for softening assertions to non-crash ones. I suggest that we mark those kind of crashtests debug build only, so that testing machines don't need to waste time on testing them on release build where they never crash. I'm not sure how many crashtests are