On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Daniel Holbert dholb...@mozilla.com
wrote:
Without getting too deep into the exact details about animation /
notifications / permissions, it sounds like Florian's concern RE
browsers want to disable fullscreen if you are not serving the website
over HTTPS may
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-05-05 6:31 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 05/05/2015 02:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Sites such as Github currently use Flash in order to
allow people to copy text to the clipboard by clicking a button in
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
n.netherc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Bill McCloskey wmcclos...@mozilla.com wrote:
Regarding process-per-core or process-per-domain or whatever, I just want
to point out that responsiveness will improve even beyond
On 6 May 2015 at 04:58, Doug Turner do...@mozilla.com wrote:
On May 5, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu valentin.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
As some of you may know, Rust is approaching its 1.0 release in a
couple of
On 5/5/15 9:58 PM, Doug Turner wrote:
Performance.
Note that performance has been a recurring problem in our current URI
code. It's a bit (10%) slower than Chrome's, but about 2x slower than
Safari's, and shows up a good bit in profiles. Some of this may be due
to XPCOM strings, of
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 05:10:42PM -0700, Bill McCloskey wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas Nethercote n.netherc...@gmail.com
wrote:
resident-unique (only available on Linux, alas) is probably the most
interesting measurement in this case.
Usually I see resident-unique
On May 5, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu valentin.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
As some of you may know, Rust is approaching its 1.0 release in a couple of
weeks. One of the major goals for Rust is using a rust library in
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Tantek Çelik tan...@cs.stanford.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2015-05-05 6:31 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 05/05/2015 02:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Sites such as Github currently use Flash
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Bill McCloskey wmcclos...@mozilla.com wrote:
Regarding process-per-core or process-per-domain or whatever, I just want
to point out that responsiveness will improve even beyond process-per-core.
You're probably right, but as you increase the number of processes
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas Nethercote n.netherc...@gmail.com
wrote:
resident-unique (only available on Linux, alas) is probably the most
interesting measurement in this case.
Usually I see resident-unique pretty consistently about 15-20MB higher than
explicit for content
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Valentin Gosu valentin.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6 May 2015 at 04:58, Doug Turner do...@mozilla.com wrote:
On May 5, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu
valentin.g...@gmail.com
We would like some feedback on build flags for the Web Speech API installation.
More specifically, we are planning to land an initial version of the Web Speech
API[1] into Geko. However, due to a number of factors, model size being one of
them, we plan to introduce various build flags which
On 2015-05-05 10:30 AM, Mike Conley wrote:
The e10s team is currently only focused on getting things to work with a
single content process at this time. We eventually want to work with
multiple content processes (as others have pointed out, the exact number
to work with is not clear), but we're
Is there a more detailed description of what the issues with multiple
content processes are that e10s itself doesn't suffer from?
I'm interpreting this as, What are the problems with multiple content
processes that single process does not have, from the user's perspective?
This is mostly
Great question Brian!
I believe you are asking if we would generate alerts based on individual
tests instead of the summary of tests. The short answer is no. In looking
at reporting the subtest results as new alerts, we found there was a lot of
noise (especially in svgx, tp5o, dromaeo, v8) as
Funny folks should bring this up - I recently wrote a blog post about this:
http://mikeconley.ca/blog/2015/05/04/electrolysis-and-the-big-tab-spinner-of-doom/
Funny how things cluster. :) I suggest reading that top to bottom before
you continue reading this post.
...
Welcome back! :D
The e10s
On 2015-05-05 4:59 AM, sn...@arbor.net wrote:
Encryption should be activated only after BOTH parties have mutually
authenticated.
Why establish an encrypted transport to an unknown attacker?
A web you have to uniquely identify yourself to participate in is really
not open or free for an awful
\o/ Great to see this come through. Shumway was already using this but
needed chrome privilege to do so. It's nice to open it up.
--Jet
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Summary: We currently disallow programmatic copying and cutting from JS for
Web
On 2015-05-05 6:31 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 05/05/2015 02:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Sites such as Github currently use Flash in order to
allow people to copy text to the clipboard by clicking a button in their UI.
Bugzilla does this, too! [1] (If you enable experimental user
interface
On 05/05/2015 12:42 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact wrote:
I heard that there was rumor of a plan to limit process count spawn to
per-domain. But I've not seen offhand of a bug filed for it or anything
The only issues I'm aware of with dom.ipc.processCount 1 are:
1. The devtools Browser Content Toolbox doesn't work.
2. Some printing related stuff doesn't work.
3. There's a theoretical issue where plugins can hang when processCount 1
and when more than one plugin is running.
The first two
My question is: after a decent period of time picking the low-hanging
fruit, if there is still non-trivial spinner time for processCount=1, would
the team consider shifting efforts to getting processCount1 ship-worthy
instead of resorting to heroics to get processCount=1 ship-worthy?
I
It definitely makes sense to start your performance investigation with
processCount=1 since that will likely highlight the low-hanging fruit which
should be fixed regardless of processCount.
My question is: after a decent period of time picking the low-hanging
fruit, if there is still non-trivial
On 5/4/2015 6:53 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
So to be clear, this is just removed/disabled for Firefox? Other
projects like Thunderbird are not affected?
Followups to dev-extensions please!
That is incorrect. This is currently disabled for all gecko applications.
B2G has asked that binary
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Nicholas Nethercote
n.netherc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact wrote:
I heard that there was rumor of a plan to limit process count spawn to
per-domain. But I've not seen offhand of
On 5/5/2015 12:23 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact wrote:
Inquiring minds would like to know.
At the moment, e10s tabs is still somewhat slower than non-e10s. Multiple
content processes would go a long way
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact wrote:
I heard that there was rumor of a plan to limit process count spawn to
per-domain. But I've not seen offhand of a bug filed for it or anything else
that relates to achieving more than one content
The additional expense of HTTPS arises from the significantly higher cost to
the service owner of protecting it against attack, to maintain service
Availability (that third side of the security CIA triangle that gets
forgotten).
Encryption should be activated only after BOTH parties have
Two cents: evolve is Good for You (tm).
Cheers,
David
On 05/05/15 22:12, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Mercurial 3.4 was released on May 1.
If you are an evolve user, I highly recommend upgrading for performance
reasons. Everyone else should consider upgrading. But you may want to
wait for 3.4.1
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:41:41AM -0400, Mike Conley wrote:
With a content process, the UI remains responsive, but we get this
bigass spinner. That's not an amazing trade-off - it's much uglier and
louder, IMO, than the whole browser locking up. The big spinner was just
an animation that we
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu valentin.g...@gmail.com wrote:
As some of you may know, Rust is approaching its 1.0 release in a couple of
weeks. One of the major goals for Rust is using a rust library in Gecko.
The specific one I'm working at the moment is adding rust-url as a
Mercurial 3.4 was released on May 1.
If you are an evolve user, I highly recommend upgrading for performance
reasons. Everyone else should consider upgrading. But you may want to wait
for 3.4.1 in case there are any regressions.
More details with a link to the changelog and Mozilla-tailored
On 05/05/15 16:40, Mike Hommey wrote:
Last time I tried e10s, which was a while ago, tab switching did feel
weird with e10s *because* of that lack of the browser lock-up, because
now, the tab strip shows you've switched tabs, but the content is still
from before switching, until the spinner
Seeing this a touch late, commenting on things not noted yet.
On 04/27/2015 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I think we should change it to require the usage of exactly one of these
keywords per *overridden* function: virtual, override, and final. Here
are the advantages:
* It is a more
Summary: We currently disallow programmatic copying and cutting from JS for
Web content, which has relied on web sites to rely on Flash in order to
copy content to the clipboard. We are planning to relax this restriction
to allow this when execCommand is called in response to a user event. This
On Tue, May 5, 2015, at 02:53 AM, Leman Bennett (Omega X) wrote:
On 5/5/2015 12:23 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact wrote:
Inquiring minds would like to know.
At the moment, e10s tabs is still
36 matches
Mail list logo
