On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Philip Chee philip.c...@gmail.com wrote:
The first question that occurs to me is what is the rationale? Can we
revisit this in 2015 to see if the original reason still holds?
Well, we want to get rid of XUL. I'm not sure it makes much sense to
revisit any of its
I did see the ts, paint regression. This happened on 4 different platforms and
was backed out for telemetry issues about 5 pushes later:
http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/1190bc7b862d
and the backout:
http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/59ad2812d3c7
By the
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:59 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
The W3C is proposing revised charters for:
Web Platform Working Group:
http://www.w3.org/2015/07/web-platform-wg.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Jul/0020.html
...
The Web Platform
On 8/12/15 3:32 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
Relatedly, why does Tenfourfox use a different branding?
Because I didn't want to get into the whole Ice* thing again. While most
of it is the same, there's quite a lot of value-added stuff (JIT,
AltiVec) and some things I turned off (plugins, webapprt),
kmoir filed https://bugzil.la/1192994 this week to hook SETA up to talos. SETA
seems like the best tool we have right now to both reduce the overall test
burden and increase the reliability of the tests we do run.
___
dev-platform mailing list
Bug 1034999 made XUL overlays ignore the hash portion of urls. Comment
12 has this note:
See related bug 305393 where different search strings must be treated
separately. But I think different hashes is probably ok to unify.
Bug 305393 asks that overlays ignore query strings. But this was
6 matches
Mail list logo
